Fix links and backlinks in RfC documents

This commit is contained in:
Fischlurch 2011-02-27 23:13:09 +01:00
parent 3e9744b6ef
commit 1f559b883a
44 changed files with 56 additions and 50 deletions

View file

@ -170,5 +170,6 @@ after a talk on irc, we decided to do it this way, further work will be
documented in the repository (tiddlywiki/source)
-- link:ct[] [[DateTime(2007-07-11T13:10:07Z)]]
''''
Back to link:Lumiera/DesignProcess[]
Back to link:/documentation/devel/rfc.html[Lumiera Design Process overview]

View file

@ -12,9 +12,10 @@ Architecure Overview
--------------------
This proposal intends to capture envisioned Architecture of the Application.
See the SVG drawing
http://www.lumiera.org/gitweb?p=LUMIERA;a=blob_plain;f=doc/devel/draw/Lumi.Archi
ecture-1.svg;hb=HEAD[Overview of Lumiera Architecture)] maintained in GIT
image:{ldoc}/devel/draw/rendered/Lumi.Architecture-1.png[Overview of Lumiera Architecture]
^The SVG source of this drawing is
link:http://www.lumiera.org/gitweb?p=LUMIERA;a=blob_plain;f=doc/devel/draw/Lumi.Architecture-1.svg;hb=HEAD[maintained in GIT]^
Description
@ -38,10 +39,11 @@ Description
Comments
--------
* Alcarinque made http://telniratha.atspace.com/ui_architecture.jpg[some
drafts] for the ui. Here is the
http://telniratha.atspace.com/ui_architecture.odg[oodraw document]. This is
not a technical draft at all, it is just an idea.
* Alcarinque made link:/documentation/design/gui/GuiDiscussion/Proposal.Alcarinque.html[some
design drafts] for the UI. Here is the
link:/documentation/design/gui/GuiDiscussion/Proposal.Alcarinque.svg[SVG source] (converted
from OODraw by Ichthyo 2011). This is not a technical draft at all, it is just
an idea.
* Wouldn't the Config Rules (embedded Prolog) also interact with the High
Level Model? Or would that be expanding its scope too much? I imagine
@ -75,4 +77,4 @@ maintained in future.
Back to link:Lumiera/DesignProcess[]
Back to link:/documentation/devel/rfc.html[Lumiera Design Process overview]

View file

@ -212,4 +212,4 @@ point", i.e. every point in the sytem, that can be extended by plugins.
-- 217.110.94.1 [[DateTime(2007-07-10T17:23:33Z)]]
''''
Back to link:Lumiera/DesignProcess[]
Back to link:/documentation/devel/rfc.html[Lumiera Design Process overview]

View file

@ -97,4 +97,4 @@ most any style. The only thing I really dislike is using tabs (with the
exeption of database DDLs and CSound files, where tab are actually helpful) :)
''''
Back to link:Lumiera/DesignProcess[]
Back to link:/documentation/devel/rfc.html[Lumiera Design Process overview]

View file

@ -72,4 +72,4 @@ Developement takes place in the repo now
-- link:ct[] [[DateTime(2007-06-27T16:14:56Z)]]
''''
Back to link:Lumiera/DesignProcess[]
Back to link:/documentation/devel/rfc.html[Lumiera Design Process overview]

View file

@ -128,4 +128,4 @@ We have now a \'compatibility wiki\', finalized this proposal
-- link:ct[] [[DateTime(2008-03-26T13:43:26Z)]]
''''
Back to link:Lumiera/DesignProcess[]
Back to link:/documentation/devel/rfc.html[Lumiera Design Process overview]

View file

@ -62,4 +62,4 @@ much discussion
-- link:ct[] [[DateTime(2007-06-27T16:07:13Z)]]
Back to link:Lumiera/DesignProcess[]
Back to link:/documentation/devel/rfc.html[Lumiera Design Process overview]

View file

@ -163,4 +163,4 @@ This Design Entry concerns whether to include such a feature and discusses the
general questions when doing so. As we for sure include meta-clip, and so so
exactly in the way described here, this proposal is 'final' now.
Back to link:Lumiera/DesignProcess[]
Back to link:/documentation/devel/rfc.html[Lumiera Design Process overview]

View file

@ -185,4 +185,4 @@ on such an init, but i would add one if really needed.
basically agreed on it iirc.
-- link:ct[] [[DateTime(2008-07-26T09:08:11Z)]]
Back to link:Lumiera/DesignProcess[]
Back to link:/documentation/devel/rfc.html[Lumiera Design Process overview]

View file

@ -53,4 +53,4 @@ Comments
* Accepted, deployed, done ... Final
-- link:ct[] [[DateTime(2007-06-27T16:13:25Z)]]
Back to link:Lumiera/DesignProcess[]
Back to link:/documentation/devel/rfc.html[Lumiera Design Process overview]

View file

@ -139,4 +139,4 @@ make no guarantee about backwards compatibility. When we spot someone using
this interfaces we ''will break'' his plugin ''intentionally''!
-- link:ct[] [[DateTime(2008-10-24T03:43:43Z)]]
Back to link:Lumiera/DesignProcess[]
Back to link:/documentation/devel/rfc.html[Lumiera Design Process overview]

View file

@ -81,4 +81,4 @@ wiki (or maybe bouml).
Comments
--------
Back to link:Lumiera/DesignProcess[]
Back to link:/documentation/devel/rfc.html[Lumiera Design Process overview]

View file

@ -109,4 +109,4 @@ Comments
Back to link:Lumiera/DesignProcess[]
Back to link:/documentation/devel/rfc.html[Lumiera Design Process overview]

View file

@ -53,4 +53,4 @@ repos to push relevant things, be careful not to push cruft or tags (which tags
shall be present here is not yet resolved -> no tags for now)
-- link:ct[] [[DateTime(2008-04-08T21:48:51Z)]]
Back to link:Lumiera/DesignProcess[]
Back to link:/documentation/devel/rfc.html[Lumiera Design Process overview]

View file

@ -94,4 +94,4 @@ Comments
we have more devs than now :P)
-- link:ct[] [[DateTime(2007-06-17T17:20:37Z)]]
Back to link:Lumiera/DesignProcess[]
Back to link:/documentation/devel/rfc.html[Lumiera Design Process overview]

View file

@ -51,4 +51,4 @@ cehteh will care for further integration
Back to link:Lumiera/DesignProcess[]
Back to link:/documentation/devel/rfc.html[Lumiera Design Process overview]

View file

@ -74,4 +74,4 @@ This proposal reflects a distinct approach taken right from start.
Marked 'final' at October.2008 developer meeting
Back to link:Lumiera/DesignProcess[]
Back to link:/documentation/devel/rfc.html[Lumiera Design Process overview]

View file

@ -118,4 +118,4 @@ Comments
in the git repository (and we already started to define things there) see
./admin/treeinfo.sh -- link:ct[] [[DateTime(2007-06-27T16:01:52Z)]]
Back to link:Lumiera/DesignProcess[]
Back to link:/documentation/devel/rfc.html[Lumiera Design Process overview]

View file

@ -142,4 +142,4 @@ Conclusion
Lua is '''accepted''' as the required scripting language by October.2008 dev
meeting.
Back to link:Lumiera/DesignProcess[]
Back to link:/documentation/devel/rfc.html[Lumiera Design Process overview]

View file

@ -138,4 +138,4 @@ Conclusion
added on demand. When doing so, we need to add thorough test coverage for
time calculations too.
Back to link:Lumiera/DesignProcess[]
Back to link:/documentation/devel/rfc.html[Lumiera Design Process overview]

View file

@ -197,4 +197,4 @@ to document this here :P
-- link:ct[] [[DateTime(2009-02-03T17:28:28Z)]]
''''
Back to link:Lumiera/DesignProcess[]
Back to link:/documentation/devel/rfc.html[Lumiera Design Process overview]

View file

@ -84,4 +84,4 @@ We concluded that that submodules are not yet needed with exception for the
./doc folder. Parked for now.
-- ct 2008-07-26 09:09:57
Back to link:Lumiera/DesignProcess[]
Back to link:/documentation/devel/rfc.html[Lumiera Design Process overview]

View file

@ -424,4 +424,4 @@ is inherently dangerous. We think the basic algorithms involved are
sufficiently well-known and understandable to implement them in a sound manner.
''''
Back to link:Lumiera/DesignProcess[]
Back to link:/documentation/devel/rfc.html[Lumiera Design Process overview]

View file

@ -158,4 +158,4 @@ Comments
[[DateTime(2008-08-04T18:33:58Z)]]
''''
Back to link:Lumiera/DesignProcess[]
Back to link:/documentation/devel/rfc.html[Lumiera Design Process overview]

View file

@ -77,4 +77,4 @@ Comments
--------
Back to link:Lumiera/DesignProcess[]
Back to link:/documentation/devel/rfc.html[Lumiera Design Process overview]

View file

@ -78,4 +78,4 @@ link:DelectusShotEvaluator[Delectus]
''''
Back to link:Lumiera/DesignProcess[]
Back to link:/documentation/devel/rfc.html[Lumiera Design Process overview]

View file

@ -46,4 +46,4 @@ Comments
We decided to use a Tiddlywiki for now until this is further worked out
-- link:ct[] [[DateTime(2008-03-08T03:38:50Z)]]
Back to link:Lumiera/DesignProcess[]
Back to link:/documentation/devel/rfc.html[Lumiera Design Process overview]

View file

@ -117,4 +117,4 @@ without even having to "drive" the development..
--link:Tree[][[DateTime(2008-08-27T20:38:00NZ)]].
''''
Back to link:Lumiera/DesignProcess[]
Back to link:/documentation/devel/rfc.html[Lumiera Design Process overview]

View file

@ -385,4 +385,4 @@ very expensive. I'm a sound guy, so I feel your pain...
- link:NicholasSA[] 2009-01-04
Back to link:Lumiera/DesignProcess[]
Back to link:/documentation/devel/rfc.html[Lumiera Design Process overview]

View file

@ -81,4 +81,4 @@ Comments
--------
Back to link:Lumiera/DesignProcess[]
Back to link:/documentation/devel/rfc.html[Lumiera Design Process overview]

View file

@ -118,4 +118,4 @@ Comments
--------
Back to link:Lumiera/DesignProcess[]
Back to link:/documentation/devel/rfc.html[Lumiera Design Process overview]

View file

@ -242,4 +242,4 @@ Conclusion
////////////////////
Back to link:Lumiera/DesignProcess[]
Back to link:/documentation/devel/rfc.html[Lumiera Design Process overview]

View file

@ -186,4 +186,4 @@ link:Plugin/Interface[] system self-describing this will also be used to
bootstrap a session on itself (by the serializer which is tightly integrated)
-- link:ct[] [[DateTime(2008-09-04T09:28:37Z)]] 2008-09-04 09:28:37
Back to link:Lumiera/DesignProcess[]
Back to link:/documentation/devel/rfc.html[Lumiera Design Process overview]

View file

@ -135,4 +135,4 @@ Comments
--------
Back to link:Lumiera/DesignProcess[]
Back to link:/documentation/devel/rfc.html[Lumiera Design Process overview]

View file

@ -134,4 +134,4 @@ Comments
--------
Back to link:Lumiera/DesignProcess[]
Back to link:/documentation/devel/rfc.html[Lumiera Design Process overview]

View file

@ -101,4 +101,4 @@ framerate" and a fixed resolution in pixels. But we certainly can do better.
-- Ichthyostega 18:09:50
Back to link:Lumiera/DesignProcess[]
Back to link:/documentation/devel/rfc.html[Lumiera Design Process overview]

View file

@ -240,4 +240,4 @@ Comments
--------
Back to link:Lumiera/DesignProcess[]
Back to link:/documentation/devel/rfc.html[Lumiera Design Process overview]

View file

@ -228,4 +228,4 @@ benchmark in more ways than one, for some time.
. --link:Tree[][[DateTime(2008-08-23T12:54:00NZ)]].
Back to link:Lumiera/DesignProcess[]
Back to link:/documentation/devel/rfc.html[Lumiera Design Process overview]

View file

@ -86,4 +86,4 @@ The good news is, that:
the matrix can be transformed from e.g. RGB to YUV, so these filters can
always work in both colorspaces directly
Back to link:Lumiera/DesignProcess[]
Back to link:/documentation/devel/rfc.html[Lumiera Design Process overview]

View file

@ -203,4 +203,4 @@ with other media related projects), than this shouldn't be a barrier.
-- link:Ichthyostega[] 2009-02-01
Back to link:Lumiera/DesignProcess[]
Back to link:/documentation/devel/rfc.html[Lumiera Design Process overview]

View file

@ -231,4 +231,4 @@ frameinfo* get_frame(unsigned num)+ where +struct frameinfo+ (not yet defined)
is something like +{ void* data; size_t size; struct metadata* meta; ...}+
-- link:ct[] 2008-10-06
Back to link:Lumiera/DesignProcess[]
Back to link:/documentation/devel/rfc.html[Lumiera Design Process overview]

View file

@ -267,4 +267,4 @@ GUI handling could make use of expanded view features like ;
Tree 2008-12-19 22:58:30
Back to link:Lumiera/DesignProcess[]
Back to link:/documentation/devel/rfc.html[Lumiera Design Process overview]

View file

@ -291,4 +291,4 @@ credit roll for each episode. Add in stopmotion, and 3D model animations with
vocal commentaries. Gather together separate items from "outworkers". Tree
(@)SIG(@)
Back to link:Lumiera/DesignProcess[]
Back to link:/documentation/devel/rfc.html[Lumiera Design Process overview]

View file

@ -73,4 +73,7 @@ Comments
//endof_comments:
''''
Back to link:/documentation/devel/rfc.html[Lumiera Design Process overview]
EOF