bughunt: replace the ConfigResolver with a direct instantiation of Singleton -> MISS

thus not lib::Singleton is the culprit, it must be lib::SingletonSubclass

research/clang-static-init-1.cpp

@@ -1,25 +1,25 @@
 #include "lib/test/run.hpp"
 
-#include "proc/config-resolver.hpp"
 #include "clang-static-init.hpp"
 
 #include <iostream>
 
-using proc::ConfigResolver;
 
 using ::test::Test;
 using std::cout;
 using std::endl;
 
+using namespace test;
 
 int
 main (int, char**)
   {
     cout <<  "\n.gulp.\n";
     
-    ConfigResolver& ref1 = ConfigResolver::instance();
+    Factory fab1;
+    Subject& ref1 = fab1();
     
-    ConfigResolver& sub2 = test::fabricate();
+    Subject& sub2 = test::fabricate();
     
     cout << "sub1="<< &ref1 << " sub2="<< &sub2 <<"\n";
     

research/clang-static-init-2.cpp

@@ -3,7 +3,6 @@
 
 #include <iostream>
 
-using proc::ConfigResolver;
 using std::cout;
 using std::endl;
 
@@ -21,14 +20,15 @@ namespace test {
    
   
   namespace {
-    Holder<Subject> fab2;
+//  Holder<Subject> fab2;
+    Factory fab2;
   }
   
   
-  ConfigResolver&
+  Subject&
   fabricate()
   {
-    return ConfigResolver::instance();
+    return fab2();
   }
   
   

research/clang-static-init.hpp

@@ -1,7 +1,8 @@
 
 #include "lib/error.hpp"
 
-#include "proc/config-resolver.hpp"
+#include "lib/singleton-subclass.hpp"
+
 
 namespace test {
 
@@ -33,8 +34,10 @@ namespace test {
       
     };
   
+  typedef lib::Singleton<Subject> Factory;
   
-  proc::ConfigResolver& fabricate();
+  
+  Subject& fabricate();