DOC: text improved and checked. All main points covered.
This commit is contained in:
parent
ee6420246f
commit
86d8a85f3b
1 changed files with 46 additions and 43 deletions
|
|
@ -18,42 +18,45 @@ _Summary written by Ichthyo_
|
|||
Focus Topics
|
||||
------------
|
||||
_Ichthyo_ started to define a collection of *FocusTopics*.
|
||||
These should be topics to focus the further development *after* the current Engine integration effort
|
||||
is completed. Some existing tickets were extended, and further new tickets created, all marked with
|
||||
the Tag `FocusTopic`
|
||||
These are topics towards which we focus our attention for further development *after* the
|
||||
current Engine integration is completed. Some tickets currently of interest were enhanced
|
||||
and extended, and new tickets created, which were all marked with the `FocusTopic` Tag.
|
||||
|
||||
-> See https://issues.lumiera.org/report/17[Report-17] in the Lumiera Issue Tracker
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
_Ichthyo_ identified some problematic questions around session modifications and change logging,
|
||||
_Ichthyo_ identified some difficult issued concerning session modifications and change logging,
|
||||
especially in connection with rules based configuration.
|
||||
|
||||
In-depth Discussion about event sourcing and session modification
|
||||
We discussed in some detail event sourcing, session modification, session configuration
|
||||
and representation of a configuration possibly as a context in the session. Of particular
|
||||
interest is the portability of a session from one machine to another and, consequently,
|
||||
the problems that can arise whem a change in configuration occurs: these should be
|
||||
recorded as an event in the Event-Log. However, this requires the representation of the
|
||||
entire configuration in a consolidated form as part of The Model. A change in the
|
||||
configuration could then be detected and recorded as an event.
|
||||
|
||||
the problem with configuration changes: these should be recorded as an event in the Event-Log.
|
||||
This requires however to represent the complete configuration in a consolidated form as part of the Model.
|
||||
A change in the configuration could then be detected and recorded as an Event.
|
||||
Another task of concern is how the actual Diff Messages will be generated. We could first
|
||||
manipulate the data model and then _detect_ a diff. Yet the favourable solution would be
|
||||
to interpret the Commands and directly derive the events associated with the commmanbs,
|
||||
with an attached diff, which can then be applied against the data model as a projection.
|
||||
|
||||
Another task to address is how the actual Diff Messages will be generated. We could first manipulate
|
||||
the data model and then _detect_ a Diff. Yet the favourable solution would be to interpret the Commands
|
||||
and directly derive Events, with an attached Diff, which can then be applied against the data model
|
||||
as a projection.
|
||||
A discussion followed to sort out which topics should be addressed first.
|
||||
|
||||
Discussion what topics should be addressed first
|
||||
|
||||
It seems the topics regarding Event Log and Session persistence #1234 #540 and #569 should be addressed first,
|
||||
since these may lead to decisions relevant for many other parts of the system.
|
||||
Possibly also #332 regarding a full definition of placement capabilities.
|
||||
It seems the topics regarding Event Log and Session persistence #1234 #540 and #569 should
|
||||
be addressed first, since these may lead to decisions relevant to many other parts of the
|
||||
system. Possibly also #332 regarding a full definition of placement capabilities.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
The topic of placement interpretation will already be touched in the *next* vertical slice,
|
||||
where we intend to add a clip to the timeline. For this we'll need at least a _simple_ resolution
|
||||
capability of placements, because we'll attempt do the groundwork for the Builder.
|
||||
The topic of placement interpretation will be addressed in the *next* vertical slice,
|
||||
where we intend to add a clip to the timeline. To do this, we'll require at least a
|
||||
_simple_ resolution capability of placements, because we'll attempt do the groundwork for
|
||||
The Builder.
|
||||
|
||||
_Benny_ proposes to add »interface« and »mock« tickets for Event-Log and Placements, blocking the
|
||||
full implementation follow-up tickets. Then these preliminary parts can be addressed first and
|
||||
integrated as part of the »Add Clip« Vertical Slice. For Context: currently the »Playback« Vertical
|
||||
Slice is being worked on, aiming at a first integration of the Render Engine.
|
||||
_Benny_ proposes to add »interface« and »mock« tickets for Event-Log and Placements,
|
||||
blocking the full implementation follow-up tickets. Then these preliminary parts can be
|
||||
addressed first and integrated as part of the »Add Clip« Vertical Slice. For Context:
|
||||
currently the »Playback« Vertical Slice is being worked on, aiming towards a first
|
||||
integration of the Render Engine.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Playback Vertical Slice
|
||||
|
|
@ -64,21 +67,21 @@ _Ichthyo_ reports on the progress of the »Playback Vertical Slice« effort.
|
|||
- Activity Language is also completed and tested
|
||||
- a passive worker pool has been implemented, based on the C++17 concurrency framework
|
||||
|
||||
Next steps...
|
||||
Next steps:
|
||||
|
||||
- retrofit our existing Thread wrapper (which was based on POSIX) to use C\+\+17 thread support;
|
||||
- retrofit our existing thread wrapper (which was based on POSIX) to use C\+\+17 thread support;
|
||||
this should be a drop-in replacement, since our own old design almost completely matches the
|
||||
design and feature set standardised with C++17
|
||||
- complete implementation of the Scheduler Layer-2, integrating Activity-Language and worker pool
|
||||
- integration test of the Scheduler
|
||||
- integration test of The Scheduler
|
||||
|
||||
Documentation Index and Glossary
|
||||
--------------------------------
|
||||
_Benny_ reworked and extended the documentation overview in the Lumiera website.
|
||||
This can be published now. Moreover, _Benny_ investigated Glossary and Index generation.
|
||||
It turns out that ASCIIDOC offers already an index generation feature, which could be configured
|
||||
and used to build an index and a glossary. The next goal would be to build a prototype for testing
|
||||
and to see how this can be integrated into the website infrastructure.
|
||||
Documentation Index and Glossary -------------------------------- _Benny_ reworked and
|
||||
extended the documentation overview in the Lumiera website. This can be published
|
||||
now. Moreover, _Benny_ investigated Glossary and Index generation. It turns out that
|
||||
ASCIIDOC already provides an index generation feature, which could be configured and used
|
||||
to build an index. But there is no support to generate a glossary which we'll build soon.
|
||||
The next goal would be to build a prototype for testing and to see how this can be
|
||||
integrated into the website infrastructure.
|
||||
|
||||
Library solutions for Video Display
|
||||
-----------------------------------
|
||||
|
|
@ -87,19 +90,19 @@ ffmpeg, GStreamer and libVLC. It was rather easy to code up an "hello world" exa
|
|||
GStreamer, while it was difficult to find suitable documentation regarding the ffmpeg based
|
||||
solution. Moreover, GStreamer seems to have a much more active and helpful community.
|
||||
|
||||
Next steps would be to also look more in-depth into libVLC, and especially to compare the
|
||||
Next steps would be to look in more depth into libVLC, and especially to compare the
|
||||
feature sets of these solutions. _Cehteh_ points out that MPV (formerly MPlayer) would also
|
||||
be an interesting point of reference. _Benny_ mentions that GTK4 offers an integrated
|
||||
video display capability.
|
||||
video display capability. We'll invesigate these frameworks further.
|
||||
|
||||
Extended discussion ensues, regarding video frameworks and the difficulties regarding the plethora
|
||||
Extended discussion ensued regarding video frameworks and the difficulties regarding the plethora
|
||||
of interfaces, especially when it comes to hardware acceleration support. Ideally, the Lumiera
|
||||
project should follow the solutions provided by a sufficiently active community, capable to follow
|
||||
the constant evolution of interfaces and framework.
|
||||
project should follow the solutions provided by a sufficiently active community, capable of following
|
||||
the constant evolution of interfaces and frameworks.
|
||||
|
||||
It was agreed upon that the »Playback Vertical Slice« just needs a very simple solution to output
|
||||
raw video (RGB888 or YUV), and offers a good opportunity for experimentation to find a suitable
|
||||
support framework
|
||||
support framework.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
''''
|
||||
|
|
@ -107,8 +110,8 @@ support framework
|
|||
Next meeting
|
||||
------------
|
||||
|
||||
The next meeting will be Wednesday Oct 11, 20:00 UTC
|
||||
|
||||
The next meeting will be Wednesday Oct 11, 20:00 UTC.
|
||||
You are welcome to join.
|
||||
|
||||
''''
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Reference in a new issue