c9bf26d8c4
EntryID finished and passes unit test
2010-06-03 04:37:19 +02:00
5cc3af3009
document the changed/new behaviour by unit test
2010-01-07 04:40:10 +01:00
3525b77126
somewhat tricky modification of for-each, allowing inline calls
2010-01-07 03:10:02 +01:00
cd3a77649e
use the (new) iterable classification to mask for_each overloads
2010-01-04 11:19:01 +01:00
7d913dc558
start moving some metaprogramming helpers to lib::meta
2010-01-04 10:08:14 +01:00
64cedb6345
implemented compile-time detection of STL or Lumiera iterator
...
closes #482
2010-01-03 05:43:33 +01:00
e27d03c501
simple duck detecor components pass unit test
2010-01-02 09:07:10 +01:00
8777aa585a
duck detector (lib helpers): initial implementation draft
2010-01-02 08:09:40 +01:00
3db676fa32
base implementation fo the ItemWrapper
2009-12-21 05:44:29 +01:00
83eb6976cd
draft an universal val/ref wrapper, needed by TransformIter.
...
Seemingly I've hit a nasty problem here, because PlacementIndex
should return an Placement&, but this is being fetched
after-the fact from within the iterator.
2009-12-20 04:33:24 +01:00
4773305853
Fix itertools: allow TransformIter to return an reference
2009-12-19 03:55:02 +01:00
043d4f42fa
working example implementation of the access mechanism to session internal APIs
2009-11-09 02:08:37 +01:00
07de2a767b
implement equality comparison on CommandImpl level
2009-10-11 05:57:44 +02:00
fea85acd0e
equality comparisons on function erasure objects covered
...
...well, as good as possible, as boost refuses to implement this feature
2009-10-11 05:57:43 +02:00
231278bafe
implemented comparison on function erasure, pending test
2009-10-11 05:57:43 +02:00
5068016805
WIP draft how the equality comparison on a function erasure could work
2009-10-11 05:57:43 +02:00
209765def5
WIP: correct indentation, add some comments...
2009-08-30 14:11:14 +02:00
1533e5bd0d
fix a problem with formatting arbitrary types; reneable the broken tests
2009-08-28 20:33:20 +02:00
1db718c2b3
WIP more stubbing...
2009-07-25 19:21:50 +02:00
76b6f5d374
ooops, forgot some copy-n-pastes
2009-07-25 17:51:59 +02:00
c85d1d3cd8
ArgumentHolder finished, low-level integration test pass
2009-07-20 07:03:18 +02:00
f73c938850
ArgumentHolder reworked to use InPlaceBuffer; now passes basic tests
2009-07-19 08:32:49 +02:00
7f44de24d7
collecting some formatting & diagnostics utils here...
2009-07-19 08:03:54 +02:00
2eb8b763d6
got the helper working (prepending a binder to an argument position)
2009-07-09 04:41:44 +02:00
c7b6165c6c
WIP resolved the simple mismatches, but still...
2009-07-08 05:36:02 +02:00
c8c577c4cc
WIP factored out another helper, not yet tested...
2009-07-06 05:25:33 +02:00
2462dee5ca
issue resolved, tests pass, finally (whew)
2009-07-06 02:25:19 +02:00
c3b8d39507
refactoring into two distinct concepts. maybe solution?
2009-07-05 22:05:11 +02:00
e2bb2c440c
use OpaqueHolder to solve the problem with the function type erasure...
...
...tried to use 2 policies, but doesn't work correct (and is uggly)
2009-07-05 03:38:33 +02:00
b65658c10d
try to fix a failing test (not really fixed yet)
2009-07-04 00:22:16 +02:00
d13d461a9c
revamp namespace func. Finish excursion on function handling
2009-07-03 14:31:52 +02:00
b7be61c4e6
composition now working
2009-07-03 13:49:12 +02:00
31e9d59d80
WIP draft solution for next task
2009-07-01 04:47:52 +02:00
8d8f184ede
check more cases, incl. function pointers
2009-07-01 03:23:26 +02:00
67e5779d24
now also able to close the last function argument
2009-07-01 02:29:11 +02:00
81d0e133c8
new additions in this area now reasonable covered ( closes #142 )
2009-07-01 00:43:19 +02:00
ca807205f9
cleanup/refactor simple type seq handling, fix broken Split template
2009-06-30 04:54:50 +02:00
320f984270
got partial application working, at least in the "front" case
2009-06-29 06:34:20 +02:00
6029c2c4e2
better name it Splice, and extend the capabilities a bit
2009-06-29 03:05:50 +02:00
03c9edce49
factored out yet another little helper, incl unit test
2009-06-29 02:03:30 +02:00
14f3641f9b
helper: initialise a tuple from an existing sub-tuple
2009-06-28 20:41:33 +02:00
8ea07bda7a
use the new bool conversion mixin to implement check for valid functor
2009-06-26 19:04:22 +02:00
5291f6e41a
move the member pointer to the current stack frame...
...
hopefully the optimiser will remove it completely ;-)
2009-06-26 17:13:36 +02:00
a30461780b
this way it works, but would cost additional storage....
2009-06-26 16:38:37 +02:00
daeff6f5fd
WIP: how to define the bool conversion / validity check for the function holders?
2009-06-26 05:27:54 +02:00
61f8c1814d
tuple test pass
2009-06-22 06:05:32 +02:00
db9ef808a5
refactoring to solve consistency problems uncovered by the tests
2009-06-21 19:52:33 +02:00
c3768b93a1
function closure utils finished and pass test
2009-06-21 08:38:24 +02:00
231834d2e9
basic tuple creation and outline of the remainder of the test
2009-06-21 02:03:22 +02:00
ad7c326c9c
got basic diagnostics for type tuples working
2009-06-20 23:18:02 +02:00
