decision: the base for any deadline calculations
is the expected real time corresponding to the grid origin.
This value is contained in the Timings record.
this clarifies the relation of TimeAnchor and Timings,
the latter act as a general spec and abstracted grid,
while the latter actually performs the conversion and
deadline checking
now this library doesn't refer to any symbols from
Proc-Layer anymore. Resolving these problems
highlighted IMHO a serious shortcomming of our
interface system, which hinders the building
of abstractions at interface level
there is now a mechanism to allow sprcialised queries
to generate this syntactic representation only on demand
The actual concrete representation e.g. for scope queries
still remains TODO, but this won't really change
until we target the integration of a real resoloution engine
while refactoring, I thought it might be a good idea
only to use Query objects. But in this special case,
most often you'd just want to pass in a simple query
with a literal query string. So this convenience shortcut
indeed makes sense.
the rules-based configuration and query system
will be located within the core application,
while the concrete implementation facilities
are expected to reside within the session or
maybe also the GUI.
This is kind of a 'rochade' refactoring to resolve
circular library dependencies and confine the parts
dependant on the session and MObjects to the Proc-Layer
And while we're in the middle of chainsaw surgery,
we'll concentrate further query-based facilities
alongside the config-rules within the App core.
This template was a leftover from the early days
of Lumiera development and doesn't provide any
substantial value as an abstraction.
For the more intricate cases, we're using the
lib::MultiFact template, which allows to install
several "fabrication" functions at runtime
the solution is to introduce a superinterface
and let Dispatcher augment that with the specific parts.
This way, the Job planning only has to rely on the
rather generic stuff (TimeAnchor, FrameCoord)
NOTE: this commit makes the whole JobPlanning machinery
compilable for the first time!
..the Idea is to rely on some kind of service,
to break the cyclic dependency with the Dispatcher.
But I seem unable to find a natural location or
concept to house that service.
basically we had two lines of doubly nested capsules, due to
using the IterAdaptor template. Actually, the evaluation stack
within JobTicket can be considered an implementation detail and
thus doesn't require an iterator interface; the intention is to
use this through JobPlanning solely.
Thus this reworking removes the special iterator within JobTicket,
but retains the idea of exposing the "current" JobTicket through
a smart pointer or operator->()
work done during the FrOSCon travel
especially the exploration stack is pushed down
first successful definition of all the JobPlanning classes
just the framework of classes necessary to pass the compiler;
all implementation is still stubbed
brainstorming how to implement the job planning stage
the idea is to built on top of the IterExplorer,
but have the "stack" of re-evaluation integrated
into a custom type, which exploits the static
node network structure to avoid heap allocations
solution idea: again use a builder function?
without any trickery, we'll always get two indirections.
Thus, the decision is to turn the 2nd indirection
into a VTable call; this way, basically the JobClosure
also acts as job functor itself.
this draft is based on
- Cehteh's draft for the scheduler
- my plannings about segmentation and JobTicket
it defines "Job" as a closure which can be invoked
from plain-C, using the information in the
job descriptor datastructure
also touches the question how to represent the job
descriptor datastructure. @Cehteh: I've just pasted
in your preliminary data struct definitinons
from the relevant mailing list discussions.
instead of (ab)using the Timings spect for a
runtime switch, better use the existing
MockInjector facility and thus turn the
mock engine mode into a global switch
