Commit graph

10 commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
ef27c09fa2 round-up and document the attribute binding and test 2016-06-09 01:10:52 +02:00
b5ab5df929 supply implementation, basically working already
so this test case is more or less finished,
just needs some more polishing and documentation
2016-06-05 17:26:48 +02:00
20c6116732 draft remainder of this test case 2016-06-05 16:52:37 +02:00
6eff16f21c supply missing implementation
standard case of attribute binding, i.e.
the setter invocation is fully functional now.
2016-06-05 16:31:29 +02:00
771295db6d draft next segment of the test 2016-06-05 16:14:18 +02:00
1ae3c1991d second round of this test implemented
...which mostly just is either ignoring the
operations or indicating failure on attempt to
'reorder' attributes (which don't have any notion of 'ordering')
2016-06-04 15:08:10 +02:00
201b6542f2 API change to allow to detect missing attribute binding
The way we build this attribute binding, there is no single
entity to handle all attribute bindings. Thus the only way
to detect a missing binding is when none of the binding layers
was able to handle a given INS verb
2016-05-28 01:17:45 +02:00
6382cac830 fix test
obvious mistake, we need a match on the GenNode ID,
so the key of the attribute binding must use the same symbol

...now the test fails at when hitting unimplemented stuff,
i.e. here the missing failure check
2016-05-27 03:39:22 +02:00
b4c91fd968 start next tree mutator test case: settle outline of the implementation
the idea is again to perform the same sequence of primitives,
this time with a binding to some local variables within the test function
here to enact the role of "object fields"

together with drafting the first segment of the test code,
I've settled down onto an implementation approach
2016-05-26 04:05:37 +02:00
06102b74ad rename test (no change) 2016-05-26 02:16:34 +02:00
Renamed from tests/library/diff/tree-manipulation-binding-test.cpp (Browse further)