/* CONFIG-RULES.hpp - interface for rule based configuration Copyright (C) Lumiera.org 2008, Hermann Vosseler This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the License, or (at your option) any later version. This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the GNU General Public License for more details. You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License along with this program; if not, write to the Free Software Foundation, Inc., 675 Mass Ave, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA. */ /** @file config-rules.hpp ** Interface for accessing rule based configuration. ** By using the Query template, you can pose a query in prolog syntax and get some ** existing or newly created object fulfilling the requested predicates. The actual ** implementation is hidden behind the #instance (Singleton factory). As of 1/2008, ** it is \e planned to use an embedded YAP Prolog system at some point in the future, ** for now we use a \link MockConfigRules mock implementation \endlink employing a ** preconfigured Map. ** ** Fully implementing this facility would require the participating objects to register capabilities ** they want to provide, together with functors carrying out the necessary configuration steps. ** All details and consequences of this approach still have to be worked out... ** ** \par relation to Query and QueryResolver ** The ConfigRules resolver is just a special kind of QueryResolver, able to handle specific kinds ** of queries. Clients using the ConfigRules directly get a more easy to use point-and-shot style ** interface, allowing just to retrieve some \em suitable solution, instead of having to iterate ** through a result set. ** ** @todo right now (12/2012) the above paragraph is a lie. ** ConfigQuery is way older than QueryResolver and will be retrofitted step by step. ** Not much of a problem, since the currently utilised mock implementation isn't able to ** deal with a real query anyway. ** ** @note this is rather a concept draft and left as such for now... don't take this code too literal! ** @todo clarify the relation of config query and query-for-defaults ///////////////TICKET #705 ** ** @see lumiera::Query ** @see mobject::session::DefsManager ** @see asset::StructFactory ** @see config-resolver.hpp specialised setup for the Proc-Layer ** @see fake-configrules.hpp currently used dummy-implementation ** @see ** */ #ifndef LUMIERA_CONFIG_RULES_H #define LUMIERA_CONFIG_RULES_H #include "lib/p.hpp" #include "lib/symbol.hpp" #include "lib/meta/generator.hpp" #include "common/query.hpp" #include namespace lumiera { using std::string; using lib::P; /////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////TICKET #705 this is draft/preview code; a real resolution system needs to be integrated namespace query { // The intention is to support the following style of Prolog code // // resolve(O, Cap) :- find(O), capabilities(Cap). // resolve(O, Cap) :- make(O), capabilities(Cap). // capabilities(Q) :- call(Q). // // stream(T, mpeg) :- type(T, fork), type(P, pipe), resolve(P, stream(P,mpeg)), placed_to(P, T). // // The type guard is inserted automatically, while the predicate implementations for // find/1, make/1, stream/2, and placed_to/2 are to be provided by the target types. // // As a example, the goal ":-retrieve(T, stream(T,mpeg))." would search a Fork object (a "track"), try to // retrieve a pipe object with stream-type=mpeg and associate the Fork with this Pipe. The // predicate "stream(P,mpeg)" needs to be implemented (natively) for the pipe object. class Resolver { ///////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////TICKET #705 a real resolution system needs to be integrated }; using lib::Symbol; using lib::Literal; using lumiera::Query; /** placeholder definition for later. * @todo intention is to integrate with lib::Symbol */ #define SYMBOL uint template < SYMBOL SYM, // Predicate symbol typename SIG = bool(string) // Signature > class Pred { }; /** * the "back side" interface towards the classes participating * in the configuration system (the config system will be * delivering instances of these classes for a given query). * This one currently is just brainstorming. The idea is that * a participating class would provide such and TypeHandler * implementing the predicates which make sense for this special * type of object. Registering such a TypeHandler should create * the necessary handler functions to be installed into * the Prolog system. * @deprecated it can't be done exactly this way, but I leave it in the * current shape as a reminder for later, to show the intention... * @todo 6/2010 unify this with the TypeHandler in typed-id.hpp */ template class TypeHandler { static const TY NIL; template TY find (Pred capability); template TY make (Pred capability, TY& refObj =NIL); }; /** * the "front side" interface: the Proc-Layer code can * use this QueryHandler to retrieve instances of the * type TY fulfilling the given Query. To start with, * we use a mock implementation. * (this code works and is already used 2/2008) * @todo retrofit this to install and use a QueryResolver * @see lumiera::query::LookupPreconfigured * @see lumiera::query::MockTable */ template class QueryHandler { protected: virtual ~QueryHandler() { } public: /** try to find or create an object of type TY * fulfilling the given query. * @param solution object fulfilling the query. Will be bound or * unified (in case it's already bound) with the first solution. * @query any goals to be fulfilled by the solution. * @return false if resolution failed. In this case, solution ptr is empty. */ virtual bool resolve (P& solution, Query const& q) = 0; }; // TODO: the Idea is to provide specialisations for the concrete types // we want to participate in the ConfigRules system.... // Thus we get the possibility to create a specific return type, // e.g. return a P but a Placement, using the appropriate factory. // Of course then the definitions need to be split up in separate headers. /** * Generic query interface for retrieving objects matching * some capability query. To be instantiated using a typelist, * thus inheriting from the Handler classes for each type. In * the (future) version using YAP Prolog, this will drive the * generation and registration of the necessary predicate * implementations for each concrete type, using the specialisations * given alongside with the types. For now it just serves to generate * the necessary resolve(Query) virtual functions (implemented * by MockConfigRules) */ template class ConfigRules : public lib::meta::InstantiateForEach { protected: ConfigRules () {} virtual ~ConfigRules() {} public: /** roll back to a pristine yet operational state. * Discards all information collected through use */ virtual void reset() =0; // TODO: find out what operations we need to support here for the »real solution« (using Prolog) }; LUMIERA_ERROR_DECLARE (CAPABILITY_QUERY); ///< unresolvable capability query. } // namespace query namespace query { /** backdoor for tests: the next config query with this query string * will magically succeed with every candidate object provided. This * is currently necessary to get objects into the defaults manager, * as the query system is not able to do real query resolution */ void setFakeBypass(lumiera::QueryKey const& q); bool isFakeBypass (lumiera::QueryKey const& q); /////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////TICKET 710 } // namespace query } // namespace lumiera #endif