lumiera_/tests/vault/mem/extent-family-test.cpp
Ichthyostega 806db414dd Copyright: clarify and simplify the file headers
* Lumiera source code always was copyrighted by individual contributors
 * there is no entity "Lumiera.org" which holds any copyrights
 * Lumiera source code is provided under the GPL Version 2+

== Explanations ==
Lumiera as a whole is distributed under Copyleft, GNU General Public License Version 2 or above.
For this to become legally effective, the ''File COPYING in the root directory is sufficient.''

The licensing header in each file is not strictly necessary, yet considered good practice;
attaching a licence notice increases the likeliness that this information is retained
in case someone extracts individual code files. However, it is not by the presence of some
text, that legally binding licensing terms become effective; rather the fact matters that a
given piece of code was provably copyrighted and published under a license. Even reformatting
the code, renaming some variables or deleting parts of the code will not alter this legal
situation, but rather creates a derivative work, which is likewise covered by the GPL!

The most relevant information in the file header is the notice regarding the
time of the first individual copyright claim. By virtue of this initial copyright,
the first author is entitled to choose the terms of licensing. All further
modifications are permitted and covered by the License. The specific wording
or format of the copyright header is not legally relevant, as long as the
intention to publish under the GPL remains clear. The extended wording was
based on a recommendation by the FSF. It can be shortened, because the full terms
of the license are provided alongside the distribution, in the file COPYING.
2024-11-17 23:42:55 +01:00

343 lines
13 KiB
C++
Raw Permalink Blame History

This file contains invisible Unicode characters

This file contains invisible Unicode characters that are indistinguishable to humans but may be processed differently by a computer. If you think that this is intentional, you can safely ignore this warning. Use the Escape button to reveal them.

/*
ExtentFamily(Test) - verify cyclic extents allocation scheme
Copyright (C)
2023, Hermann Vosseler <Ichthyostega@web.de>
  **Lumiera** is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify it
  under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by the
  Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the License, or (at your
  option) any later version. See the file COPYING for further details.
* *****************************************************************/
/** @file extent-family-test.cpp
** unit test \ref ExtentFamily_test
*/
#include "lib/test/run.hpp"
#include "vault/mem/extent-family.hpp"
#include "lib/iter-explorer.hpp"
#include "lib/util.hpp"
#include <utility>
using test::Test;
using util::isnil;
using util::isSameObject;
using lib::explore;
namespace vault{
namespace mem {
namespace test {
using Extents = ExtentFamily<int, 10>;
using Extent = Extents::Extent;
using Iter = Extents::iterator;
/***************************************************************//**
* @test document and verify a memory management scheme to maintain
* a flexible set of _»memory extents«_ for cyclic usage.
* @see BlockFlow_test
*/
class ExtentFamily_test : public Test
{
virtual void
run (Arg)
{
seedRand();
simpleUsage();
use_and_drop();
iteration();
reuseUnclean();
wrapAround();
}
/** @test demonstrate a simple usage scenario
*/
void
simpleUsage()
{
Extents extents{5};
extents.openNew();
Extent& extent = *extents.begin();
CHECK (10 == extent.size());
int num = rani(1000);
extent[2] = num;
extent[5] = num+5;
CHECK (num == extent[2]);
CHECK (num+5 == extent[5]);
}
/** @test verify claiming new and discarding old slots
*/
void
use_and_drop()
{
Extents extents{5};
CHECK ( 0 == watch(extents).first());
CHECK ( 0 == watch(extents).last());
CHECK ( 0 == watch(extents).active());
CHECK ( 5 == watch(extents).size());
extents.openNew(3);
CHECK ( 0 == watch(extents).first());
CHECK ( 3 == watch(extents).last());
CHECK ( 3 == watch(extents).active());
CHECK ( 5 == watch(extents).size());
extents.dropOld(2);
CHECK ( 2 == watch(extents).first());
CHECK ( 3 == watch(extents).last());
CHECK ( 1 == watch(extents).active());
CHECK ( 5 == watch(extents).size());
}
/** @test verify access to the extents by iteration,
* thereby possibly claiming the next extents
*/
void
iteration()
{
Extents extents{5};
CHECK (isnil (extents));
Iter it = extents.begin();
CHECK (isnil (it)); // no extents provided yet
extents.openNew(2); // allot two extents for active use
CHECK (it);
CHECK (0 == it.getIndex());
CHECK (isSameObject(*it, *extents.begin()));
Extent& extent{*it};
CHECK (10 == extent.size());
int num = rani(1000);
extent[2] = num;
CHECK (num == extent[2]);
++it;
CHECK (it);
CHECK (1 == it.getIndex());
Extent& nextEx{*it};
CHECK (not isSameObject(extent, nextEx));
CHECK (isSameObject(nextEx, *extents.last()));
nextEx[5] = extent[2] + 1;
CHECK (num == extent[2]);
CHECK (num+1 == nextEx[5]);
++it;
CHECK (it == extents.end());
CHECK (isnil (it)); // only two allocated
it.expandAlloc(); // but can expand allocation
CHECK (it);
// iterate again to verify we get the same memory blocks
it = extents.begin();
CHECK (isSameObject(*it, extent));
CHECK ((*it)[2] == num);
++it;
CHECK (isSameObject(*it, nextEx));
CHECK ((*it)[5] == num+1);
}
/** @test verify that neither constructors nor destructors are invoked
* automatically when discarding or re-using extents.
*/
void
reuseUnclean()
{
struct Probe
{
short val;
Probe() : val(1 + rani(1000)) { }
~Probe() { val = 0; }
};
using SpecialExtents = ExtentFamily<Probe, 1000>;
SpecialExtents spex{3};
spex.openNew(2);
CHECK ( 0 == watch(spex).first());
CHECK ( 2 == watch(spex).last());
// implant a new Probe object into each »slot« of the new extent
auto& extent = *spex.begin();
for (Probe& probe : extent)
new(&probe) Probe;
auto calcChecksum = [](SpecialExtents::Extent& extent) -> size_t
{
size_t sum{0};
for (Probe& probe : extent)
sum += probe.val;
return sum;
};
size_t checksum = calcChecksum (*spex.begin());
// discard first extent, i.e. mark it as unused
// while the underlying memory block remains allocated
// and data within this block is not touched
spex.dropOld(1);
CHECK ( 1 == watch(spex).first());
CHECK ( 2 == watch(spex).last());
// the »begin« (i.e. the first active extent is now another memory block
CHECK (not isSameObject (extent, *spex.begin()));
size_t checkSecond = calcChecksum (*spex.begin());
CHECK (checkSecond != checksum);
// but the random data generated above still sits in the original (first) memory block
CHECK (checksum == calcChecksum (extent));
// now let the actively allotted extents "wrap around"...
spex.dropOld(1);
CHECK ( 2 == watch(spex).first());
CHECK ( 2 == watch(spex).last());
spex.openNew(2);
CHECK ( 2 == watch(spex).first());
CHECK ( 1 == watch(spex).last());
auto iter = spex.begin();
CHECK ( 2 == iter.getIndex());
++iter;
CHECK ( 0 == iter.getIndex());
CHECK (isSameObject(*iter, extent));
// and during all those allotting and dropping, data in the memory block was not touched,
// which also proves that constructors or destructors of the nominal "content" are not invoked
CHECK (checksum == calcChecksum (extent));
}
/** @test verify in detail how iteration wraps around to also reuse
* previously dropped extents, possibly rearranging the internal
* management-vector to allow growing new extents at the end.
* - existing allocations are re-used cyclically
* - this may lead to a »wrapped« internal state
* - necessitating to expand allocations in the middle
* - yet all existing Extent addresses remain stable
*/
void
wrapAround()
{
// Helper to capture the storage addresses of all currently active Extents
auto snapshotAdr = [](Extents& extents)
{
auto takeAdr = [](auto& x){ return &*x; };
return explore(extents).transform(takeAdr).effuse();
};
auto verifyAdr = [](auto snapshot, auto it)
{
for (auto oldAddr : snapshot)
{
if (not isSameObject(*oldAddr, *it))
return false;
++it;
}
return true;
};
Extents extents{5};
CHECK ( extents.empty());
CHECK ( 0 == watch(extents).first());
CHECK ( 0 == watch(extents).last());
CHECK ( 0 == watch(extents).active());
CHECK ( 5 == watch(extents).size());
extents.openNew(4);
CHECK ( 0 == watch(extents).first());
CHECK ( 4 == watch(extents).last());
CHECK ( 4 == watch(extents).active());
CHECK ( 5 == watch(extents).size());
auto snapshot = snapshotAdr(extents); // capture *addresses* of currently active Extents
CHECK (4 == snapshot.size());
extents.openNew();
CHECK ( 0 == watch(extents).first());
CHECK ( 5 == watch(extents).last());
CHECK ( 5 == watch(extents).active());
CHECK (10 == watch(extents).size()); // Note: heuristics to over-allocate to some degree
CHECK (verifyAdr (snapshot, extents.begin()));
extents.dropOld(3); // place the active window such as to start on last snapshotted Extent
CHECK ( 3 == watch(extents).first());
CHECK ( 5 == watch(extents).last());
CHECK ( 2 == watch(extents).active());
CHECK (10 == watch(extents).size());
CHECK (isSameObject (*extents.begin(), *snapshot.back()));
extents.openNew(6); // now provoke a »wrapped« state of internal management of active Extents
CHECK ( 3 == watch(extents).first()); // ...Note: the position of the *first* active Extent...
CHECK ( 1 == watch(extents).last()); // ... is *behind* the position of the last active Extent
CHECK ( 8 == watch(extents).active()); // ... implying that the active strike wraps at allocation end
CHECK (10 == watch(extents).size());
snapshot = snapshotAdr (extents); // take a new snapshot; this also verifies proper iteration
CHECK (8 == snapshot.size());
extents.openNew(2); // ask for more than can be accommodated without ambiguity
CHECK ( 8 == watch(extents).first()); // ...Note: new allocation was inserted, existing tail shifted
CHECK ( 3 == watch(extents).last()); // ... allowing for the requested two »slots« to be accommodated
CHECK (10 == watch(extents).active());
CHECK (15 == watch(extents).size());
CHECK (verifyAdr (snapshot, extents.begin())); // ... yet all existing Extent addresses have been rotated transparently
extents.dropOld(10); // close out all active slots, wrapping the first-pos to approach last
CHECK ( 3 == watch(extents).first());
CHECK ( 3 == watch(extents).last());
CHECK ( 0 == watch(extents).active());
CHECK (15 == watch(extents).size());
extents.openNew(12); // provoke a special boundary situation, where the end is *just wrapped*
CHECK ( 3 == watch(extents).first());
CHECK ( 0 == watch(extents).last());
CHECK (12 == watch(extents).active());
CHECK (15 == watch(extents).size());
extents.dropOld(11); // and make this boundary situation even more nasty, just sitting on the rim
CHECK (14 == watch(extents).first());
CHECK ( 0 == watch(extents).last());
CHECK ( 1 == watch(extents).active());
CHECK (15 == watch(extents).size());
CHECK (14 == extents.begin().getIndex());
snapshot = snapshotAdr (extents); // verify iteration end just after wrapping properly detected
CHECK (1 == snapshot.size());
CHECK (isSameObject (*extents.begin(), *snapshot.front()));
extents.openNew(14); // and now provoke further expansion, adding new allocation right at start
CHECK (19 == watch(extents).first()); // ...Note: first must be relocated to sit again at the very rim
CHECK (14 == watch(extents).last()); // ... to allow last to sit at the index previously used by first
CHECK (15 == watch(extents).active());
CHECK (20 == watch(extents).size());
CHECK (19 == extents.begin().getIndex()); // ... yet address of the first Extent remains the same, just held in another slot
CHECK (isSameObject (*extents.begin(), *snapshot.front()));
}
};
/** Register this test class... */
LAUNCHER (ExtentFamily_test, "unit memory");
}}} // namespace vault::mem::test