lumiera_/tests/core/steam/engine/node-link-test.cpp
Ichthyostega efcb456e25 Invocation: ++ Milestone ++ invoke complex render graph
Based on the building blocks developed thus far,
it was possible to assemble a typical media processing chain
 * two source nodes
 * one of these passes data through a filter
 * a mixer node on top to combine both chains
 * time-based automation for processing parameters
As actual computation, hash-chaining on blocks of
reproducible random data was used, allowing to verify
for every data word that expected computations were
carried out, in the expected order.
2025-02-19 23:27:52 +01:00

520 lines
24 KiB
C++
Raw Blame History

This file contains invisible Unicode characters

This file contains invisible Unicode characters that are indistinguishable to humans but may be processed differently by a computer. If you think that this is intentional, you can safely ignore this warning. Use the Escape button to reveal them.

/*
NodeLink(Test) - render node connectivity and collaboration
Copyright (C)
2024, Hermann Vosseler <Ichthyostega@web.de>
  **Lumiera** is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify it
  under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by the
  Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the License, or (at your
  option) any later version. See the file COPYING for further details.
* *****************************************************************/
/** @file node-link-test.cpp
** The \ref NodeLink_test covers the essence of connected render nodes.
*/
#include "lib/test/run.hpp"
#include "steam/engine/proc-node.hpp"
#include "steam/engine/node-builder.hpp"
#include "steam/engine/test-rand-ontology.hpp"
#include "steam/engine/diagnostic-buffer-provider.hpp"
#include "steam/asset/meta/time-grid.hpp"
#include "lib/time/timequant.hpp"
#include "lib/time/timecode.hpp"
#include "lib/util.hpp"
#include <array>
using std::array;
using util::isnil;
using util::isSameObject;
namespace steam {
namespace engine{
namespace test {
using lib::time::Time;
using lib::time::QuTime;
using lib::time::FrameNr;
using lib::time::FrameCnt;
namespace {
ont::Flavr SRC_A = 10; ///< »chain-A« arbitrary source frame marker
ont::Flavr SRC_B = 20; ///< similar for »chain-B«
Symbol SECONDS_GRID = "grid_sec"; ///< 1-seconds grid for translation Time -> Frame-#
const uint NUM_INVOCATIONS = 100;
}
/***************************************************************//**
* @test demonstrate and document how [render nodes](\ref proc-node.hpp)
* are connected into a processing network, allowing to _invoke_
* a \ref Port on a node to pull-generate a render result.
* - Nodes can be built and ID metadata can be inspected
* - several Nodes can be linked into a render graph
* - connectivity can be verified to match definition
* - TestFrame data can be computed in a complex processing network
* - parameters can be derived from time and fed into the nodes.
*/
class NodeLink_test : public Test
{
virtual void
run (Arg)
{
seedRand();
build_simple_node();
build_connected_nodes();
trigger_node_port_invocation();
}
/** @test Build Node Port for simple function
* and verify observable properties of a Render Node
* @todo 7/24 ✔ define ⟶ ✔ implement
*/
void
build_simple_node()
{
// use some dummy specs and a dummy operation....
StrView nodeID{ont::DUMMY_NODE_ID};
StrView procID{ont::DUMMY_PROC_ID};
CHECK (nodeID == "Test:dummy"_expect);
CHECK (procID == "op(int)"_expect);
// use the NodeBuilder to construct a simple source-node connectivity
auto con = prepareNode(nodeID)
.preparePort()
.invoke(procID, ont::dummyOp)
.completePort()
.build();
CHECK (isnil (con.leads));
CHECK (1 == con.ports.size());
// can build a ProcNode with this connectivity
ProcNode n1{move(con)};
CHECK (watch(n1).isValid());
CHECK (watch(n1).leads().empty());
CHECK (watch(n1).ports().size() == 1);
// can generate a symbolic spec to describe the Port's processing functionality...
CHECK (watch(n1).getPortSpec(0) == "dummy.op(int)"_expect);
CHECK (watch(n1).getPortSpec(1) == ""_expect);
// such a symbolic spec is actually generated by a deduplicated metadata descriptor
auto& meta1 = ProcID::describe("N1","(arg)");
auto& meta1b = ProcID::describe("N1","(arg)");
auto& meta2 = ProcID::describe("N2","(arg)");
auto& meta3 = ProcID::describe("N1","uga()");
CHECK ( isSameObject (meta1,meta1b));
CHECK (not isSameObject (meta1,meta2));
CHECK (not isSameObject (meta1,meta3));
CHECK (hash_value(meta1) == hash_value(meta1b));
CHECK (hash_value(meta1) != hash_value(meta2));
CHECK (hash_value(meta1) != hash_value(meta3));
CHECK (meta1.genProcSpec() == "N1(arg)"_expect);
CHECK (meta2.genProcSpec() == "N2(arg)"_expect);
CHECK (meta3.genProcSpec() == "N1.uga()"_expect);
// re-generate the descriptor for the source node (n1)
auto& metaN1 = ProcID::describe("Test:dummy","op(int)");
CHECK (metaN1.genProcSpec() == "dummy.op(int)"_expect);
CHECK (metaN1.genProcName() == "dummy.op"_expect);
CHECK (metaN1.genNodeName() == "Test:dummy"_expect);
CHECK (metaN1.genNodeSpec(con.leads) == "Test:dummy-◎"_expect);
}
/** @test Build more elaborate Render Nodes linked into a connectivity network
* - verify nodes with several ports; at exit-level, 3 ports are available
* - using two different source nodes, one with two, one with three ports
* - the 2-port source is linearly chained to a 2-port filter node
* - the exit-level is a mix node, combining data from both chains
* - apply the automatic wiring of ports with the same number, whereby
* the first port connects to the first port on the lead, and so on.
* - yet for the 3rd port at the mix node, on one side the port number
* must be given explicitly, since the »A-side« chain offers only
* two ports.
* @todo 1/25 ✔ define ⟶ ✔ implement
*/
void
build_connected_nodes()
{
// This operation emulates a data source
auto src_op = [](int param, int* res){ *res = param; };
// A Node with two (source) ports
ProcNode n1s{prepareNode("srcA")
.preparePort()
.invoke("a(int)", src_op)
.setParam(5)
.completePort()
.preparePort()
.invoke("b(int)", src_op)
.setParam(23)
.completePort()
.build()};
// A node to add some "processing" to each data chain
auto add1_op = [](int* src, int* res){ *res = 1 + *src; };
ProcNode n1f{prepareNode("filterA")
.preparePort()
.invoke("a+1(int)(int)", add1_op)
.connectLead(n1s)
.completePort()
.preparePort()
.invoke("b+1(int)(int)", add1_op)
.connectLead(n1s)
.completePort()
.build()};
// Need a secondary source, this time with three ports
ProcNode n2s{prepareNode("srcB")
.preparePort()
.invoke("a(int)", src_op)
.setParam(7)
.completePort()
.preparePort()
.invoke("b(int)", src_op)
.setParam(13)
.completePort()
.preparePort()
.invoke("c(int)", src_op)
.setParam(17)
.completePort()
.build()};
// This operation emulates mixing of two source chains
auto mix_op = [](array<int*,2> src, int* res){ *res = (*src[0] + *src[1]) / 2; };
// Wiring for the Mix, building up three ports
// Since the first source-chain has only two ports,
// for the third result port we'll re-use the second source
ProcNode mix{prepareNode("mix")
.preparePort()
.invoke("a-mix(int/2)(int)", mix_op)
.connectLead(n1f)
.connectLead(n2s)
.completePort()
.preparePort()
.invoke("b-mix(int/2)(int)", mix_op)
.connectLead(n1f)
.connectLead(n2s)
.completePort()
.preparePort()
.invoke("c-mix(int/2)(int)", mix_op)
.connectLeadPort(n1f,1)
.connectLead(n2s)
.completePort()
.build()};
// verify Node-level connectivity
CHECK ( is_linked(n1f).to(n1s));
CHECK (not is_linked(n2s).to(n1s));
CHECK (not is_linked(mix).to(n1s));
CHECK ( is_linked(mix).to(n2s));
CHECK ( is_linked(mix).to(n1f));
CHECK (watch(n1s).leads().size() == 0 );
CHECK (watch(n1f).leads().size() == 1 );
CHECK (watch(n2s).leads().size() == 0 );
CHECK (watch(mix).leads().size() == 2 );
// verify Node and connectivity spec
CHECK (watch(n1s).getNodeSpec() == "srcA-◎"_expect );
CHECK (watch(n1f).getNodeSpec() == "filterA◁—srcA-◎"_expect );
CHECK (watch(n2s).getNodeSpec() == "srcB-◎"_expect );
CHECK (watch(mix).getNodeSpec() == "mix┉┉{srcA, srcB}"_expect);
// verify setup of the source nodes
CHECK (watch(n1s).ports().size() == 2 );
CHECK (watch(n1s).watchPort(0).isSrc());
CHECK (watch(n1s).watchPort(1).isSrc());
CHECK (watch(n1s).watchPort(0).getProcSpec() == "srcA.a(int)"_expect );
CHECK (watch(n1s).watchPort(1).getProcSpec() == "srcA.b(int)"_expect );
CHECK (watch(n1s).getPortSpec(0) == "srcA.a(int)"_expect );
CHECK (watch(n1s).getPortSpec(1) == "srcA.b(int)"_expect );
// second source node has 3 ports....
CHECK (watch(n2s).ports().size() == 3 );
CHECK (watch(n2s).watchPort(0).isSrc());
CHECK (watch(n2s).watchPort(1).isSrc());
CHECK (watch(n2s).watchPort(2).isSrc());
CHECK (watch(n2s).watchPort(0).getProcSpec() == "srcB.a(int)"_expect );
CHECK (watch(n2s).watchPort(1).getProcSpec() == "srcB.b(int)"_expect );
CHECK (watch(n2s).watchPort(2).getProcSpec() == "srcB.c(int)"_expect );
CHECK (watch(n2s).getPortSpec(0) == "srcB.a(int)"_expect );
CHECK (watch(n2s).getPortSpec(1) == "srcB.b(int)"_expect );
CHECK (watch(n2s).getPortSpec(2) == "srcB.c(int)"_expect );
// verify 2-chain
CHECK (watch(n1f).leads().size() == 1 );
CHECK (watch(n1f).ports().size() == 2 );
CHECK (watch(n1f).watchPort(0).srcPorts().size() == 1 );
CHECK (watch(n1f).watchLead(0).ports().size() == 2 );
CHECK (watch(n1f).watchLead(0).getNodeName() == "srcA"_expect);
CHECK (watch(n1f).watchPort(0).watchLead(0).getProcSpec() == "srcA.a(int)"_expect );
CHECK (watch(n1f).watchLead(0).watchPort(0).getProcSpec() == "srcA.a(int)"_expect );
CHECK (watch(n1f).watchPort(0).srcPorts()[0] == watch(n1f).watchLead(0).ports()[0]);
CHECK (watch(n1f).watchPort(1).srcPorts()[0] == watch(n1f).watchLead(0).ports()[1]);
// verify mix with 3 ports
CHECK (watch(mix).leads().size() == 2);
CHECK (watch(mix).leads()[0] == n1f );
CHECK (watch(mix).leads()[1] == n2s );
CHECK (watch(mix).ports().size() == 3);
CHECK (watch(mix).watchPort(0).srcPorts().size() == 2 );
CHECK (watch(mix).watchPort(1).srcPorts().size() == 2 );
CHECK (watch(mix).watchPort(2).srcPorts().size() == 2 );
CHECK (watch(mix).watchLead(0).ports().size() == 2 );
CHECK (watch(mix).watchLead(1).ports().size() == 3 );
CHECK (watch(mix).watchPort(0).watchLead(0).getProcName() == "filterA.a+1"_expect );
CHECK (watch(mix).watchLead(0).watchPort(0).getProcName() == "filterA.a+1"_expect );
CHECK (watch(mix).watchPort(1).watchLead(0).getProcName() == "filterA.b+1"_expect );
CHECK (watch(mix).watchLead(0).watchPort(1).getProcName() == "filterA.b+1"_expect );
CHECK (watch(mix).watchPort(2).watchLead(0).getProcName() == "filterA.b+1"_expect ); // special connection to port 1 on lead
CHECK (watch(mix).watchLead(0).watchPort(1).getProcName() == "filterA.b+1"_expect );
CHECK (watch(mix).watchPort(0).srcPorts()[0] == watch(mix).watchLead(0).ports()[0]);
CHECK (watch(mix).watchPort(1).srcPorts()[0] == watch(mix).watchLead(0).ports()[1]);
CHECK (watch(mix).watchPort(2).srcPorts()[0] == watch(mix).watchLead(0).ports()[1]);
CHECK (watch(mix).watchPort(0).watchLead(1).getProcName() == "srcB.a"_expect );
CHECK (watch(mix).watchLead(1).watchPort(0).getProcName() == "srcB.a"_expect );
CHECK (watch(mix).watchPort(1).watchLead(1).getProcName() == "srcB.b"_expect );
CHECK (watch(mix).watchLead(1).watchPort(1).getProcName() == "srcB.b"_expect );
CHECK (watch(mix).watchPort(2).watchLead(1).getProcName() == "srcB.c"_expect );
CHECK (watch(mix).watchLead(1).watchPort(2).getProcName() == "srcB.c"_expect );
CHECK (watch(mix).watchPort(0).srcPorts()[1] == watch(mix).watchLead(1).ports()[0]);
CHECK (watch(mix).watchPort(1).srcPorts()[1] == watch(mix).watchLead(1).ports()[1]);
CHECK (watch(mix).watchPort(2).srcPorts()[1] == watch(mix).watchLead(1).ports()[2]);
//________________________________________________________
// for sake of completeness: all these nodes can be invoked
BufferProvider& provider = DiagnosticBufferProvider::build();
auto invoke = [&](ProcNode& node, uint port)
{ // Sequence to invoke a Node...
BuffHandle buff = provider.lockBufferFor<int> (-55);
CHECK (-55 == buff.accessAs<int>());
buff = node.pull (port, buff, Time::ZERO, ProcessKey{0});
int result = buff.accessAs<int>();
buff.release();
return result;
};
// node|port
CHECK (invoke (n1s, 0 ) == 5);
CHECK (invoke (n1s, 1 ) == 23);
CHECK (invoke (n1f, 0 ) == 5+1);
CHECK (invoke (n1f, 1 ) == 23+1);
CHECK (invoke (n2s, 0 ) == 7);
CHECK (invoke (n2s, 1 ) == 13);
CHECK (invoke (n2s, 2 ) == 17);
CHECK (invoke (mix, 0 ) == (5+1 + 7 )/2);
CHECK (invoke (mix, 1 ) == (23+1 + 13)/2);
CHECK (invoke (mix, 2 ) == (23+1 + 17)/2);
}
/** @test Invoke some render nodes as linked together.
* - use exactly the same topology as in the preceding test
* - but this time use TestFrame (random data) and configure
* hash-chaining operations provided by »Test Random«
* - setup various automation functions, based on the frame-#
* - use a pre-computation step to _quantise_ time into frame-#
* - install this pre-computation as »Param Agent Node«
* - configure individual parameters to consume precomputed frame-#
* - use _partial closure_ to supply the source-»flavour« parameter
* - also rebuild the expected computations by direct invocation
* - sample various test runs with randomly chosen time and port-#
* - verify computed data checksums match with expected computation.
* @todo 2/25 ✔ define ⟶ ✔ implement
*/
void
trigger_node_port_invocation()
{
auto testGen = testRand().setupGenerator();
auto testMan = testRand().setupManipulator();
auto testMix = testRand().setupCombinator();
// Prepare for Time-Quantisation --> Frame-# or Offset parameter
steam::asset::meta::TimeGrid::build (SECONDS_GRID, 1);
auto quantSecs = [&](Time time){ return FrameNr::quant (time, SECONDS_GRID); };
// Prepare a precomputed parameter for the complete tree
auto selectFrameNo = [&](TurnoutSystem& tuSys){ return quantSecs(tuSys.getNomTime()); };
auto paramSpec = buildParamSpec()
.addSlot (selectFrameNo);
auto accFrameNo = paramSpec.makeAccessor<0>();
// Prepare mapping- and automation-functions
auto stepFilter = [] (FrameCnt id)-> ont::Param { return util::limited (10, -10 + id, 50); };
auto stepMixer = [] (FrameCnt id)-> ont::Factr { return util::limited (0, + id, 50) / 50.0; };
// note: binds the accessor for the precomputed FrameNo-parameter
auto autoFilter = [=](TurnoutSystem& tuSys){ return stepFilter (tuSys.get (accFrameNo)); };
auto autoMixer = [=](TurnoutSystem& tuSys){ return stepMixer (tuSys.get (accFrameNo)); };
// A Node with two (source) ports
ProcNode n1s{prepareNode("srcA")
.preparePort()
.invoke(testGen.procID(), testGen.makeFun()) // params(frameNo, flavour)
.closeParam<1>(SRC_A + 0) // --> flavour ≔ SRC_A + port#0
.retrieveParam(accFrameNo)
.completePort()
.preparePort()
.invoke(testGen.procID(), testGen.makeFun())
.closeParam<1>(SRC_A + 1) // --> flavour ≔ SRC_A + port#1
.retrieveParam(accFrameNo)
.completePort()
.build()};
// A node to »filter« the data in chain-A
ProcNode n1f{prepareNode("filterA")
.preparePort()
.invoke(testMan.procID(), testMan.makeFun())
.attachParamFun(autoFilter) // filter-param <-- autoFilter(frameNo)
.connectLead(n1s)
.completePort()
.preparePort()
.invoke(testMan.procID(), testMan.makeFun())
.attachParamFun(autoFilter)
.connectLead(n1s)
.completePort()
.build()};
// A secondary source Node, this time with three ports
ProcNode n2s{prepareNode("srcB")
.preparePort()
.invoke(testGen.procID(), testGen.makeFun()) // params(frameNo, flavour)
.closeParam<1>(SRC_B + 0) // --> flavour ≔ SRC_B + port#0
.retrieveParam(accFrameNo)
.completePort()
.preparePort()
.invoke(testGen.procID(), testGen.makeFun())
.closeParam<1>(SRC_B + 1) // --> flavour ≔ SRC_B + port#1
.retrieveParam(accFrameNo)
.completePort()
.preparePort()
.invoke(testGen.procID(), testGen.makeFun())
.closeParam<1>(SRC_B + 2) // --> flavour ≔ SRC_B + port#2
.retrieveParam(accFrameNo)
.completePort()
.build()};
// Wiring for the Mix, building three ports,
// drawing from both source-chains
ProcNode mix{prepareNode("mix")
.preparePort()
.invoke(testMix.procID(), testMix.makeFun())
.attachParamFun(autoMixer) // mixer-param <-- autoMixer(frameNo)
.connectLead(n1f)
.connectLead(n2s)
.completePort()
.preparePort()
.invoke(testMix.procID(), testMix.makeFun())
.attachParamFun(autoMixer)
.connectLead(n1f)
.connectLead(n2s)
.completePort()
.preparePort()
.invoke(testMix.procID(), testMix.makeFun())
.attachParamFun(autoMixer)
.connectLeadPort(n1f,1) // note: using 2nd port from chain-A, which only has two ports
.connectLead(n2s)
.completePort()
.build()};
// Set a »Param-Agent«-Node on top to pre-compute the FrameNo
ProcNode parNode{prepareNode("Param")
.preparePort()
.computeParam(paramSpec)
.delegateLead(mix)
.completePort()
.preparePort()
.computeParam(paramSpec)
.delegateLead(mix)
.completePort()
.preparePort()
.computeParam(paramSpec)
.delegateLead(mix)
.completePort()
.build()};
// Effectively, the following computation is expected to happen...
auto verify = [&](Time nomTime, uint port)
{
ont::FraNo fraNo = quantSecs(nomTime);
ont::Flavr fla_A = SRC_A + util::min (port, 1u);
ont::Flavr fla_B = SRC_B + util::min (port, 2u);
ont::Param param = stepFilter(fraNo);
ont::Factr mix = stepMixer (fraNo);
TestFrame f1{uint(fraNo),fla_A};
TestFrame f2{uint(fraNo),fla_B};
ont::manipulateFrame (&f1, &f1, param);
ont::combineFrames (&f1, &f1, &f2, mix);
CHECK (not f1.isPristine());
CHECK ( f2.isPristine());
return f1.getChecksum();
};
BufferProvider& provider = DiagnosticBufferProvider::build();
const BuffDescr buffDescr = provider.getDescriptor<TestFrame>();
auto invoke = [&](Time nomTime, uint port)
{ // Sequence to invoke a Node...
BuffHandle buff = provider.lockBuffer(buffDescr);
TestFrame& result = buff.accessAs<TestFrame>();
CHECK ( result.isPristine());
buff = parNode.pull (port, buff, nomTime, ProcessKey{});
CHECK ( result.isValid());
CHECK (not result.isPristine());
HashVal checksum = result.getChecksum();
buff.release();
return checksum;
};
// Computations should be pure (not depending on order)
// Thus sample various random times and ports
for (uint i=0; i < NUM_INVOCATIONS; ++i)
{
uint port = rani(3);
Time nomTime{rani(60'000),0}; // drive test with a random »nominal Time« <60s with ms granularity
// Invoke -- and compare checksum with direct computation
CHECK (invoke (nomTime,port) == verify (nomTime,port));
}
}
};
/** Register this test class... */
LAUNCHER (NodeLink_test, "unit node");
}}} // namespace steam::engine::test