lumiera_/tests/core/steam/engine/scheduler-interface-test.cpp
Ichthyostega 806db414dd Copyright: clarify and simplify the file headers
* Lumiera source code always was copyrighted by individual contributors
 * there is no entity "Lumiera.org" which holds any copyrights
 * Lumiera source code is provided under the GPL Version 2+

== Explanations ==
Lumiera as a whole is distributed under Copyleft, GNU General Public License Version 2 or above.
For this to become legally effective, the ''File COPYING in the root directory is sufficient.''

The licensing header in each file is not strictly necessary, yet considered good practice;
attaching a licence notice increases the likeliness that this information is retained
in case someone extracts individual code files. However, it is not by the presence of some
text, that legally binding licensing terms become effective; rather the fact matters that a
given piece of code was provably copyrighted and published under a license. Even reformatting
the code, renaming some variables or deleting parts of the code will not alter this legal
situation, but rather creates a derivative work, which is likewise covered by the GPL!

The most relevant information in the file header is the notice regarding the
time of the first individual copyright claim. By virtue of this initial copyright,
the first author is entitled to choose the terms of licensing. All further
modifications are permitted and covered by the License. The specific wording
or format of the copyright header is not legally relevant, as long as the
intention to publish under the GPL remains clear. The extended wording was
based on a recommendation by the FSF. It can be shortened, because the full terms
of the license are provided alongside the distribution, in the file COPYING.
2024-11-17 23:42:55 +01:00

196 lines
6.1 KiB
C++
Raw Blame History

This file contains invisible Unicode characters

This file contains invisible Unicode characters that are indistinguishable to humans but may be processed differently by a computer. If you think that this is intentional, you can safely ignore this warning. Use the Escape button to reveal them.

/*
SchedulerInterface(Test) - verify invocation structure of the scheduler interface
Copyright (C)
2013, Hermann Vosseler <Ichthyostega@web.de>
  **Lumiera** is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify it
  under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by the
  Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the License, or (at your
  option) any later version. See the file COPYING for further details.
* *****************************************************************/
/** @file scheduler-interface-test.cpp
** unit test \ref SchedulerInterface_test
**
** @deprecated 6/2023 the Scheduler interface is about to be defined anew,
** and will likely be totally different than envisioned here...
*/
#include "lib/test/run.hpp"
#include "lib/util.hpp"
#include "vault/real-clock.hpp"
#include "vault/gear/scheduler-frontend.hpp"
#include "vault/gear/scheduler-diagnostics.hpp"
#include "steam/engine/mock-dispatcher.hpp"
namespace vault{
namespace gear {
namespace test {
using util::isSameObject;
using lib::time::Duration;
using lib::time::Offset;
using lib::time::FSecs;
using steam::engine::test::MockJob;
namespace { // test fixture: scheduling a dummy job operation...
Time TEST_START_TIME (vault::RealClock::now());
const Duration TEST_FRAME_DURATION(FSecs(1,2));
inline Offset
dummyFrameStart (uint frameNr)
{
return frameNr * TEST_FRAME_DURATION;
}
} //(End) test fixture
typedef SchedulerFrontend::JobTransaction JobTransaction;
/***********************************************************************//**
* @test verify and demonstrate the organisation of the high-level interface
* for defining jobs to be invoked by the scheduler.
*
* @see SchedulerFrongend
* @see DispatcherInterface_test
*/
class SchedulerInterface_test : public Test
{
virtual void
run (Arg)
{
seedRand();
SchedulerFrontend& scheduler = SchedulerFrontend::instance();
verify_simple_job_specification (scheduler);
verify_job_specification_variations (scheduler);
demonstrate_nested_job_specification (scheduler);
}
void
verify_simple_job_specification (SchedulerFrontend& scheduler)
{
SchedulerDiagnostics monitor(scheduler);
MockJob job;
Time deadline(TEST_START_TIME);
scheduler.startJobTransaction()
.addJob(deadline, job)
.commit();
CHECK ( monitor.is_scheduled_timebound (job));
CHECK (!monitor.is_scheduled_background (job));
CHECK (!monitor.is_scheduled_freewheeling (job));
}
void
verify_job_specification_variations (SchedulerFrontend& scheduler)
{
SchedulerDiagnostics monitor(scheduler);
JobTransaction tx = scheduler.startJobTransaction();
MockJob job1;
MockJob job2;
tx.addFreewheeling(job1);
tx.addBackground (job2);
CHECK (!monitor.is_scheduled_timebound (job1));
CHECK (!monitor.is_scheduled_timebound (job2));
CHECK (!monitor.is_scheduled_background (job1));
CHECK (!monitor.is_scheduled_background (job2));
CHECK (!monitor.is_scheduled_freewheeling (job1));
CHECK (!monitor.is_scheduled_freewheeling (job2));
tx.commit();
CHECK (!monitor.is_scheduled_timebound (job1));
CHECK (!monitor.is_scheduled_timebound (job2));
CHECK ( monitor.is_scheduled_background (job1));
CHECK ( monitor.is_scheduled_freewheeling (job2));
}
/** @test demonstrate how a tree of dependent render jobs
* can be handed over to the scheduler within a single "transaction"
*
* @remarks in the real usage situation, the definition of jobs will be
* driven by the exploration of a tree-like structure (the JobTicket).
* For the purpose of this interface demonstration test this recursive
* invocation structure is just emulated by a simple tail recursion.
* @deprecated 6/2023 STOP we do it quite different now, and better,
* in the Job-Planning-Pipeline
*/
void
demonstrate_nested_job_specification (SchedulerFrontend& scheduler)
{
SchedulerDiagnostics monitor(scheduler);
JobTransaction startTx = scheduler.startJobTransaction();
uint dummyLevel = 5;
specifyJobs (startTx, dummyLevel);
startTx.commit();
for (uint i=0; i <=5; ++i)
{
Time nominalTime(dummyFrameStart (i));
Time deadline(TEST_START_TIME + nominalTime);
CHECK (monitor.has_job_scheduled_at (deadline));
CHECK (nominalTime == monitor.job_at(deadline).parameter.nominalTime);
}
}
/** recursive helper function to add several levels of prerequisites
* It is crucial for this function to be recursive: this allows us to represent
* a complete tree navigation as a sequence of job definitions to be "pulled"
* out from some opaque source
*/
static void
specifyJobs (JobTransaction& currentTx, uint dummyLevel)
{
uint frameNr = dummyLevel;
Time nominalTime(dummyFrameStart(frameNr));
Time deadline(TEST_START_TIME + nominalTime);
MockJob job{nominalTime, frameNr};
currentTx.addJob (deadline, job);
if (0 < dummyLevel)
{
JobTransaction dependentTx = currentTx.startPrerequisiteTx();
specifyJobs (dependentTx, dummyLevel-1);
currentTx.attach (dependentTx);
}
}
};
/** Register this test class... */
LAUNCHER(SchedulerInterface_test, "unit engine");
}}} // namespace vault::gear::test