lumiera_documentation/doc/devel/rfc/ArchitectureOverview.txt
Ichthyostega 7d237647d4 DOC: normalise towards a single form of gitweb-URL
In the past we allowed a lot of leeway when referring to our
web-interface to the Lumiera Git repositories (git.lumiera.org/gitweb)
Unfortunately this caused the AI scraper bots »out there« to capture
millions of URLs for all the different flavours of spelling them out.

And now they haunt our website and try to scrap that content again and again;
even while we effectively prevent that kind of abuse, rejecting those
ongoing attempts at content-scraping causes a dangerously high amount of traffic.

With this changeset, all cross references in the documentation section
are rewritten to the only remaining valid form of that Gitweb URL.
2026-02-15 23:02:52 +01:00

81 lines
3.6 KiB
Text

Architecure Overview
====================
[options="autowidth"]
|====================================
|*State* | _Final_
|*Date* | _2008-03-06_
|*Proposed by* | Ichthyostega
|====================================
Architecure Overview
--------------------
This proposal intends to capture envisioned Architecture of the Application.
image:{ldoc}/devel/draw/rendered/Lumi.Architecture-1.png[Overview of Lumiera Architecture]
^The SVG source of this drawing is
https://git.lumiera.org/gitweb?p=LUMIERA;a=blob_plain;f=doc/devel/draw/Lumi.Architecture-1.svg;hb=HEAD[maintained in GIT(2008)]·
https://git.lumiera.org/gitweb?p=LUMIERA;a=blob_plain;f=doc/devel/draw/Lumi.Architecture-2.svg;hb=HEAD[(current: 2022)]^
Description
~~~~~~~~~~~
* the Application has three Layers: Vault, Steam and Stage.footnote:[at the
time of this writing, those three layers were named ``Backend'', ``Proc'' and ``GUI'']
* the Application shall be completely functional without GUI (script-driven)
* all IO, media data fetching, processing and bookkeeping falls within the
realm of the Vault Layer
* all media object manipulation, deciding and configuration is the Steam
Layer's job
* extensible by plugins on all levels, highly configurable, but not totally
componentized (micro kernel) architecture
* strong separation between high-level and low-level areas of the Application
* the user/GUI manipulates a high-level model whereas rendering is based on a
corresponding low-level model
* stored Session (state) is comprised of high-level model, a collection of
Assets and accompanying configuration
* (possibly) several storage backends, abstracted out by a common interface
Comments
--------
* Alcarinque made link:/x/Proposal.Alcarinque.html[some design drafts] for the UI. +
This is not a technical draft at all, it is just an idea.
* Wouldn't the Config Rules (embedded Prolog) also interact with the High
Level Model? Or would that be expanding its scope too much? I imagine
default/user configurable settings such as explicit !LocatingPin placement
vs Relative !LocatingPin placement. For example, in an AMV, or any music
video actually, the positioning of clips should be always relative against
the audio/music. However, if you are editing a scene in a movie, you want
the next scene to appear relative to the last scene played. In the first,
you want to keep the scenes always synced up against the audio, while in the
latter, you just want the scenes to appear one after another.
PercivalTiglao:: '2008-07-16T05:32:45Z'
* Yes, indeed, that is what I am planning. The drawing above just doesn't show
every connection. The interaction between high-level model and rules system
mostly goes via the ``session defaults'"'', which are facts _and_ rules. Thus,
in your example, the user would just use the ``default placement'"''. My
Intention was to use *tags* to quite some extent. The user would be able
to tag the source footage, and then rules can kick in when a certain tag
applies. Incidentally, integrating prolog is immediately on the agenda,
because first we want to flesh out the very basic system and get to work
basic rendering. Until then, I use a _mock implementation_ of the
query/rules system, which just returns some hard wired defaults.
Ichthyostega:: '2008-09-04T15:38:21Z'
Conclusion
----------
Accepted. The drawing was moved into the GIT tree. +
It was upgraded and reworked
https://git.lumiera.org/gitweb?p=LUMIERA;a=blob_plain;f=doc/devel/draw/Lumi.Architecture-2.svg;hb=0b9f2e2c3139cad542013caac593cb5972a2e3f6[in 2022]
Back to link:/x/DesignProcess.html[Lumiera Design Process overview]