LUMIERA.clone/tests/library/advice/advice-binding-pattern-test.cpp

211 lines
7.3 KiB
C++
Raw Normal View History

/*
AdviceBindingPattern(Test) - cover pattern matching used to dispatch Advice
2010-12-17 23:28:49 +01:00
Copyright: clarify and simplify the file headers * Lumiera source code always was copyrighted by individual contributors * there is no entity "Lumiera.org" which holds any copyrights * Lumiera source code is provided under the GPL Version 2+ == Explanations == Lumiera as a whole is distributed under Copyleft, GNU General Public License Version 2 or above. For this to become legally effective, the ''File COPYING in the root directory is sufficient.'' The licensing header in each file is not strictly necessary, yet considered good practice; attaching a licence notice increases the likeliness that this information is retained in case someone extracts individual code files. However, it is not by the presence of some text, that legally binding licensing terms become effective; rather the fact matters that a given piece of code was provably copyrighted and published under a license. Even reformatting the code, renaming some variables or deleting parts of the code will not alter this legal situation, but rather creates a derivative work, which is likewise covered by the GPL! The most relevant information in the file header is the notice regarding the time of the first individual copyright claim. By virtue of this initial copyright, the first author is entitled to choose the terms of licensing. All further modifications are permitted and covered by the License. The specific wording or format of the copyright header is not legally relevant, as long as the intention to publish under the GPL remains clear. The extended wording was based on a recommendation by the FSF. It can be shortened, because the full terms of the license are provided alongside the distribution, in the file COPYING.
2024-11-17 23:42:55 +01:00
Copyright (C)
2010, Hermann Vosseler <Ichthyostega@web.de>
2010-12-17 23:28:49 +01:00
Copyright: clarify and simplify the file headers * Lumiera source code always was copyrighted by individual contributors * there is no entity "Lumiera.org" which holds any copyrights * Lumiera source code is provided under the GPL Version 2+ == Explanations == Lumiera as a whole is distributed under Copyleft, GNU General Public License Version 2 or above. For this to become legally effective, the ''File COPYING in the root directory is sufficient.'' The licensing header in each file is not strictly necessary, yet considered good practice; attaching a licence notice increases the likeliness that this information is retained in case someone extracts individual code files. However, it is not by the presence of some text, that legally binding licensing terms become effective; rather the fact matters that a given piece of code was provably copyrighted and published under a license. Even reformatting the code, renaming some variables or deleting parts of the code will not alter this legal situation, but rather creates a derivative work, which is likewise covered by the GPL! The most relevant information in the file header is the notice regarding the time of the first individual copyright claim. By virtue of this initial copyright, the first author is entitled to choose the terms of licensing. All further modifications are permitted and covered by the License. The specific wording or format of the copyright header is not legally relevant, as long as the intention to publish under the GPL remains clear. The extended wording was based on a recommendation by the FSF. It can be shortened, because the full terms of the license are provided alongside the distribution, in the file COPYING.
2024-11-17 23:42:55 +01:00
  **Lumiera** is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify it
  under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by the
  Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the License, or (at your
  option) any later version. See the file COPYING for further details.
2010-12-17 23:28:49 +01:00
Copyright: clarify and simplify the file headers * Lumiera source code always was copyrighted by individual contributors * there is no entity "Lumiera.org" which holds any copyrights * Lumiera source code is provided under the GPL Version 2+ == Explanations == Lumiera as a whole is distributed under Copyleft, GNU General Public License Version 2 or above. For this to become legally effective, the ''File COPYING in the root directory is sufficient.'' The licensing header in each file is not strictly necessary, yet considered good practice; attaching a licence notice increases the likeliness that this information is retained in case someone extracts individual code files. However, it is not by the presence of some text, that legally binding licensing terms become effective; rather the fact matters that a given piece of code was provably copyrighted and published under a license. Even reformatting the code, renaming some variables or deleting parts of the code will not alter this legal situation, but rather creates a derivative work, which is likewise covered by the GPL! The most relevant information in the file header is the notice regarding the time of the first individual copyright claim. By virtue of this initial copyright, the first author is entitled to choose the terms of licensing. All further modifications are permitted and covered by the License. The specific wording or format of the copyright header is not legally relevant, as long as the intention to publish under the GPL remains clear. The extended wording was based on a recommendation by the FSF. It can be shortened, because the full terms of the license are provided alongside the distribution, in the file COPYING.
2024-11-17 23:42:55 +01:00
* *****************************************************************/
/** @file advice-binding-pattern-test.cpp
** unit test \ref AdviceBindingPattern_test
*/
#include "lib/test/run.hpp"
#include "lib/test/test-helper.hpp"
#include "lib/format-cout.hpp"
#include "lib/time/timevalue.hpp"
#include "common/advice.hpp"
using lib::time::Time;
namespace lumiera {
namespace advice {
namespace test {
namespace {
class DummyAdvice { };
}
/***************************************************************************//**
* @test the pattern matching machinery used to find an Advice solution.
* Each advice::Provision and advice::Request specifies a binding, used
* to discern various pieces of advice. Whenever patterns on the two sides
* match, an Advice channel is created, causing the advice provision to
* get visible to the advised entity.
*
* This test creates various patterns and verifies matching behaves
* as specified and documented.
*
* @todo partially unimplemented and thus commented out ////////////////////TICKET #605
*
* @see advice.hpp
* @see AdviceBasics_test
* @see AdviceMultiplicity_test
* @see AdviceIndex_test implementation test
*/
class AdviceBindingPattern_test : public Test
{
virtual void
run (Arg)
{
verifyPatternSyntax();
verifyPatternNormalisation();
verifyStaticMatch();
verifyPreparedMatch();
verifyDynamicMatch();
}
void
verifyPatternSyntax()
{
#define _PARSE_AND_SHOW(_STR_) \
cout << _STR_ << "\t--->" << Binding(_STR_) << endl;
_PARSE_AND_SHOW ("");
_PARSE_AND_SHOW ("aSymbol");
_PARSE_AND_SHOW ("a.compound_Symbol-with-various.parts");
_PARSE_AND_SHOW ("trailing Garbage allowed. ☢☢ eat ☠☠☠ atomic ☠☠☠ waste ☢☢");
_PARSE_AND_SHOW ("a, list , of ,symbols.");
_PARSE_AND_SHOW ("nullary().");
_PARSE_AND_SHOW ("nullary( )");
_PARSE_AND_SHOW ("nullary .");
_PARSE_AND_SHOW ("predicate( with-argument )");
VERIFY_ERROR (BINDING_PATTERN_SYNTAX, Binding("no (valid definition here)"));
VERIFY_ERROR (BINDING_PATTERN_SYNTAX, Binding("predicate(with ☠☠☠ Garbage ☠☠☠"));
VERIFY_ERROR (BINDING_PATTERN_SYNTAX, Binding("§&Ω%€GΩ%€ar☠☠☠baäääääge"));
Binding testBinding;
testBinding.addTypeGuard<DummyAdvice>();
testBinding.addPredicate("one two(), three( four ).");
cout << testBinding << endl;
}
void
verifyPatternNormalisation()
{
Binding b0, b00;
Binding b1 ("cat1(), cat2().");
Binding b2 (" cat2 cat1 ....");
cout << "b0==" << b0 << endl;
cout << "b1==" << b1 << endl;
cout << "b2==" << b2 << endl;
CHECK (b0 == b00); CHECK (b00 == b0);
CHECK (b1 == b2); CHECK (b2 == b1);
CHECK (b0 != b1); CHECK (b1 != b0);
CHECK (b0 != b2); CHECK (b2 != b0);
2025-06-07 23:59:57 +02:00
b2.addPredicate("cat1()"); // adding the same predicate multiple times has no effect
b2.addPredicate(" cat1 ");
CHECK (b1 == b2);
b2.addPredicate("cat3(zzz)");
CHECK (b1 != b2);
b1.addTypeGuard<Time>();
CHECK (b1 != b2);
b1.addPredicate(" cat3( zzz ) ");
CHECK (b1 != b2);
b2.addTypeGuard<Time>();
CHECK (b1 == b2);
cout << "b2==" << b2 << endl;
}
void
verifyStaticMatch()
{
CHECK ( matches (Binding(), Binding()));
CHECK ( matches (Binding("pred()"), Binding("pred( ) ")));
CHECK ( matches (Binding("pred(x)"), Binding("pred(x)")));
CHECK (!matches (Binding("pred()"), Binding("pred(x)")));
CHECK (!matches (Binding("pred(x)"), Binding("pred(y)")));
CHECK ( matches (Binding("pred(x), pred(y)"), Binding("pred(y), pred(x)")));
CHECK (!matches (Binding("pred(x), pred(y)"), Binding("pred(y), pred(y)")));
}
void
verifyPreparedMatch()
{
Binding b1 ("pred()");
Binding b2 ("pred");
Binding b3 ("pred, pred(x)");
Binding b4 ("pred( x ) , pred().");
CHECK ( matches (b1,b2));
CHECK ( matches (b3,b4));
Binding::Matcher bm1 (b1.buildMatcher());
Binding::Matcher bm2 (b2.buildMatcher());
Binding::Matcher bm3 (b3.buildMatcher());
Binding::Matcher bm4 (b4.buildMatcher());
CHECK (hash_value(b1) == hash_value(bm1));
CHECK (hash_value(b2) == hash_value(bm2));
CHECK (hash_value(b3) == hash_value(bm3));
CHECK (hash_value(b4) == hash_value(bm4));
CHECK (hash_value(b1) != hash_value(b3));
CHECK ( matches (bm1,bm2));
CHECK ( matches (bm3,bm4));
CHECK (!matches (bm1,bm3));
CHECK (!matches (bm2,bm4));
}
/** @test match against patterns containing variables,
* verify the created solution arguments
* @todo this is a future extension and its not clear
* if we need it and what the exact semantics
* could be ///////////////////////////////TICKET #615
*/
void
verifyDynamicMatch()
{
#if false /////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////UNIMPLEMENTED :: TICKET #615
CHECK ( matches (Binding("pred(u)"), Binding("pred(X)")));
CHECK ( matches (Binding("pred(f(u))"), Binding("pred(f(X))")));
CHECK ( matches (Binding("pred(f(u,Y))"), Binding("pred(f(X,v))")));
CHECK ( matches (Binding("pred(f(u,X))"), Binding("pred(f(X,v))"))); // the so called "standardisation apart"
CHECK (!matches (Binding("pred(u,v)"), Binding("pred(X)")));
CHECK (!matches (Binding("pred(f(u))"), Binding("pred(f(v))")));
CHECK (!matches (Binding("pred(f(u))"), Binding("pred(g(X))")));
CHECK (!matches (Binding("pred(f(u,v))"), Binding("pred(f(X,X))")));
//////TODO should also cover the difference between equality and match, which gets tangible only in conjunction with variables
#endif /////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////UNIMPLEMENTED :: TICKET #615
}
};
/** Register this test class... */
LAUNCHER (AdviceBindingPattern_test, "unit common");
}}} // namespace lumiera::advice::test