LUMIERA.clone/tests/library/multifact-test.cpp

321 lines
9.8 KiB
C++
Raw Normal View History

/*
MultiFact(Test) - cover the configurable object-family creating factory
2010-12-17 23:28:49 +01:00
Copyright: clarify and simplify the file headers * Lumiera source code always was copyrighted by individual contributors * there is no entity "Lumiera.org" which holds any copyrights * Lumiera source code is provided under the GPL Version 2+ == Explanations == Lumiera as a whole is distributed under Copyleft, GNU General Public License Version 2 or above. For this to become legally effective, the ''File COPYING in the root directory is sufficient.'' The licensing header in each file is not strictly necessary, yet considered good practice; attaching a licence notice increases the likeliness that this information is retained in case someone extracts individual code files. However, it is not by the presence of some text, that legally binding licensing terms become effective; rather the fact matters that a given piece of code was provably copyrighted and published under a license. Even reformatting the code, renaming some variables or deleting parts of the code will not alter this legal situation, but rather creates a derivative work, which is likewise covered by the GPL! The most relevant information in the file header is the notice regarding the time of the first individual copyright claim. By virtue of this initial copyright, the first author is entitled to choose the terms of licensing. All further modifications are permitted and covered by the License. The specific wording or format of the copyright header is not legally relevant, as long as the intention to publish under the GPL remains clear. The extended wording was based on a recommendation by the FSF. It can be shortened, because the full terms of the license are provided alongside the distribution, in the file COPYING.
2024-11-17 23:42:55 +01:00
Copyright (C)
2014, Hermann Vosseler <Ichthyostega@web.de>
2010-12-17 23:28:49 +01:00
Copyright: clarify and simplify the file headers * Lumiera source code always was copyrighted by individual contributors * there is no entity "Lumiera.org" which holds any copyrights * Lumiera source code is provided under the GPL Version 2+ == Explanations == Lumiera as a whole is distributed under Copyleft, GNU General Public License Version 2 or above. For this to become legally effective, the ''File COPYING in the root directory is sufficient.'' The licensing header in each file is not strictly necessary, yet considered good practice; attaching a licence notice increases the likeliness that this information is retained in case someone extracts individual code files. However, it is not by the presence of some text, that legally binding licensing terms become effective; rather the fact matters that a given piece of code was provably copyrighted and published under a license. Even reformatting the code, renaming some variables or deleting parts of the code will not alter this legal situation, but rather creates a derivative work, which is likewise covered by the GPL! The most relevant information in the file header is the notice regarding the time of the first individual copyright claim. By virtue of this initial copyright, the first author is entitled to choose the terms of licensing. All further modifications are permitted and covered by the License. The specific wording or format of the copyright header is not legally relevant, as long as the intention to publish under the GPL remains clear. The extended wording was based on a recommendation by the FSF. It can be shortened, because the full terms of the license are provided alongside the distribution, in the file COPYING.
2024-11-17 23:42:55 +01:00
  **Lumiera** is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify it
  under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by the
  Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the License, or (at your
  option) any later version. See the file COPYING for further details.
2010-12-17 23:28:49 +01:00
Copyright: clarify and simplify the file headers * Lumiera source code always was copyrighted by individual contributors * there is no entity "Lumiera.org" which holds any copyrights * Lumiera source code is provided under the GPL Version 2+ == Explanations == Lumiera as a whole is distributed under Copyleft, GNU General Public License Version 2 or above. For this to become legally effective, the ''File COPYING in the root directory is sufficient.'' The licensing header in each file is not strictly necessary, yet considered good practice; attaching a licence notice increases the likeliness that this information is retained in case someone extracts individual code files. However, it is not by the presence of some text, that legally binding licensing terms become effective; rather the fact matters that a given piece of code was provably copyrighted and published under a license. Even reformatting the code, renaming some variables or deleting parts of the code will not alter this legal situation, but rather creates a derivative work, which is likewise covered by the GPL! The most relevant information in the file header is the notice regarding the time of the first individual copyright claim. By virtue of this initial copyright, the first author is entitled to choose the terms of licensing. All further modifications are permitted and covered by the License. The specific wording or format of the copyright header is not legally relevant, as long as the intention to publish under the GPL remains clear. The extended wording was based on a recommendation by the FSF. It can be shortened, because the full terms of the license are provided alongside the distribution, in the file COPYING.
2024-11-17 23:42:55 +01:00
* *****************************************************************/
/** @file multifact-test.cpp
** unit test \ref MultiFact_test
*/
#include "lib/test/run.hpp"
#include "lib/test/test-helper.hpp"
#include "lib/multifact.hpp"
#include "lib/util.hpp"
#include <boost/lexical_cast.hpp>
#include <functional>
#include <memory>
#include <string>
namespace lib {
namespace test{
using boost::lexical_cast;
using util::isSameObject;
using util::isnil;
using std::shared_ptr;
using std::function;
using std::string;
using std::bind;
using lumiera::error::LUMIERA_ERROR_INVALID;
namespace { // hierarchy of test dummy objects
struct Interface
{
virtual ~Interface() {};
virtual operator string () =0;
};
enum theID
{ ONE = 1
, TWO
, THR
, FOU
};
template<theID ii>
class Implementation
: public Interface
{
string instanceID_;
operator string()
{
return instanceID_ + lexical_cast<string> (ii);
}
public:
Implementation(string id = "Impl-")
: instanceID_(id)
{ }
};
template<typename X>
string
buildSome (X rawVal)
{
return lexical_cast<string> (rawVal);
}
string
buildOne()
{
return buildSome(ONE);
}
}
/******************************************************************************//**
* @test verify the basic usage patterns of the configurable factory template.
* - Depending on the concrete fabrication signature, the factory can produce
* "things" by invoking suitable fabrication functions. These functions
* are to be installed beforehand, and can be addressed through an ID.
* - these fabrication functions are installed per instance of the factory.
* Such a concrete factory configuration can be copied
* - optionally each created product can be passed through a wrapper function
* - there is a preconfigured wrapper for creating refcounting smart ptrs.
2025-06-07 23:59:57 +02:00
* - it is possible to define a custom wrapper function on factory setup.
* @see lib::MultiFact
*/
class MultiFact_test : public Test
{
2025-06-07 23:59:57 +02:00
virtual void
run (Arg)
{
produce_simple_values();
produce_smart_pointers();
pass_additional_arguments();
fed_a_custom_finishing_functor();
}
string
callMe (string val)
{
++invocations_;
return val;
}
uint invocations_ = 0;
void
produce_simple_values()
{
using TestFactory = factory::MultiFact<string, theID>;
TestFactory theFact;
// the first "production line" is wired to a free function
theFact.defineProduction (ONE, buildOne);
// second "production line" uses a explicit partial closure
theFact.defineProduction (TWO, bind (buildSome<theID>, TWO));
// for the third "production line" we set up a function object
auto memberFunction = bind (&MultiFact_test::callMe, this, "lalü");
theFact.defineProduction (THR, memberFunction);
// and the fourth "production line" uses a lambda, closed with a local reference
string backdoor("backdoor");
theFact.defineProduction (FOU, [&] {
return backdoor;
});
CHECK (!isnil (theFact));
CHECK (theFact(ONE) == "1");
CHECK (theFact(TWO) == "2");
CHECK (theFact(THR) == "lalü");
CHECK (invocations_ == 1);
CHECK (theFact(FOU) == "backdoor");
backdoor = "I am " + backdoor.substr(0,4);
CHECK (theFact(FOU) == "I am back");
TestFactory anotherFact;
CHECK (isnil (anotherFact));
VERIFY_ERROR (INVALID, anotherFact(ONE) );
anotherFact.defineProduction (ONE, memberFunction);
CHECK (anotherFact(ONE) == "lalü");
CHECK (invocations_ == 2);
CHECK (theFact(THR) == "lalü");
CHECK (invocations_ == 3);
CHECK ( theFact.contains (FOU));
CHECK (!anotherFact.contains (FOU));
anotherFact = theFact;
CHECK (anotherFact.contains (FOU));
CHECK (!isSameObject(theFact, anotherFact));
CHECK (anotherFact(ONE) == "1");
CHECK (anotherFact(TWO) == "2");
CHECK (anotherFact(THR) == "lalü");
CHECK (anotherFact(FOU) == "I am back");
CHECK (invocations_ == 4);
}
void
produce_smart_pointers()
{
using TestFactory = factory::MultiFact<Interface, theID, factory::BuildRefcountPtr>;
using PIfa = shared_ptr<Interface>;
TestFactory theFact;
// set up the "production lines" by lambda
theFact.defineProduction (ONE, [] { return new Implementation<ONE>; });
theFact.defineProduction (TWO, [] { return new Implementation<TWO>; });
theFact.defineProduction (THR, [] { return new Implementation<THR>; });
theFact.defineProduction (FOU, [] { return new Implementation<FOU>; });
CHECK (!isnil (theFact));
PIfa p1 = theFact(ONE);
PIfa p2 = theFact(TWO);
PIfa p3 = theFact(THR);
PIfa p4 = theFact(FOU);
PIfa p11 = theFact(ONE);
CHECK ("Impl-1" == string(*p1));
CHECK ("Impl-2" == string(*p2));
CHECK ("Impl-3" == string(*p3));
CHECK ("Impl-4" == string(*p4));
CHECK ("Impl-1" == string(*p11));
CHECK (!isSameObject(*p1, *p11));
PIfa p12(p11);
CHECK (isSameObject(*p11, *p12));
CHECK ("Impl-1" == string(*p12));
CHECK (1 == p1.use_count());
CHECK (2 == p11.use_count());
CHECK (2 == p12.use_count());
}
void
pass_additional_arguments()
{
using TestFactory = factory::MultiFact<Interface*(string), theID>;
TestFactory theFact;
// set up the "production lines"
theFact.defineProduction (ONE, [](string ) { return new Implementation<ONE>; });
theFact.defineProduction (TWO, [](string ) { return new Implementation<TWO>("X"); });
theFact.defineProduction (THR, [](string id) { return new Implementation<THR>(id); });
theFact.defineProduction (FOU, [](string id) { return new Implementation<FOU>("Z"+id);});
Interface *p1 = theFact(ONE, "irrelevant"),
*p2 = theFact(TWO, "ignored"),
*p3 = theFact(THR, "idiocy"),
*p4 = theFact(FOU, "omg"),
*p5 = theFact(FOU, "z");
// does not compile...
// theFact(ONE);
// theFact(ONE, "foo", bar);
CHECK ("Impl-1" == string(*p1));
CHECK ("X2" == string(*p2));
CHECK ("idiocy3"== string(*p3));
CHECK ("Zomg4" == string(*p4));
CHECK ("Zz4" == string(*p5));
CHECK (!isSameObject(*p4, *p5));
CHECK (INSTANCEOF(Implementation<ONE>, p1));
CHECK (INSTANCEOF(Implementation<TWO>, p2));
CHECK (INSTANCEOF(Implementation<THR>, p3));
CHECK (INSTANCEOF(Implementation<FOU>, p4));
CHECK (INSTANCEOF(Implementation<FOU>, p5));
delete p1;
delete p2;
delete p3;
delete p4;
delete p5;
}
void
fed_a_custom_finishing_functor()
{
using TestFactory = factory::MultiFact<int(int), theID, factory::Build<long>::Wrapper>;
TestFactory theFact;
// Setup(1): each "production line" does a distinct calculation
theFact.defineProduction (ONE, [](int par) { return par; });
theFact.defineProduction (TWO, [](int par) { return 2 * par; });
theFact.defineProduction (THR, [](int par) { return par*par; });
theFact.defineProduction (FOU, [](int par) { return 1 << par;});
// Setup(2): and a common "wrapper functor" finishes
// the output of the chosen "production line"
theFact.defineFinalWrapper([](int raw) { return raw + 1; });
CHECK (long(1 + 1) == theFact(ONE, 1));
CHECK (long(1 + 2) == theFact(ONE, 2));
CHECK (long(1 + 3) == theFact(ONE, 3));
CHECK (long(1 + 2) == theFact(TWO, 1));
CHECK (long(1 + 4) == theFact(TWO, 2));
CHECK (long(1 + 6) == theFact(TWO, 3));
CHECK (long(1 + 1) == theFact(THR, 1));
CHECK (long(1 + 4) == theFact(THR, 2));
CHECK (long(1 + 9) == theFact(THR, 3));
CHECK (long(1 + 2) == theFact(FOU, 1));
CHECK (long(1 + 4) == theFact(FOU, 2));
CHECK (long(1 + 8) == theFact(FOU, 3));
}
};
/** Register this test class... */
LAUNCHER (MultiFact_test, "unit common");
}} // namespace lib::test