LUMIERA.clone/src/lib/diff/tree-diff-application.hpp

132 lines
6 KiB
C++
Raw Normal View History

/*
TREE-DIFF-APPLICATION.hpp - consume and apply a tree diff
Copyright (C) Lumiera.org
2014, Hermann Vosseler <Ichthyostega@web.de>
This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or
modify it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as
published by the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of
the License, or (at your option) any later version.
This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the
GNU General Public License for more details.
You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
along with this program; if not, write to the Free Software
Foundation, Inc., 675 Mass Ave, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA.
*/
/** @file tree-diff-application.hpp
** Concrete implementation to apply structural changes to hierarchical
** data structures. Together with the generic #DiffApplicator, this allows
** to receive linearised structural diff descriptions and apply them to
** a given target data structure, to effect the corresponding changes.
**
** ## Design considerations
** While -- conceptually -- our tree diff handling can be seen as an extension
** and generalisation of list diffing, the decision was \em not to embody this
** extension into the implementation technically, for sake of clarity. More so,
** since the Record, which serves as foundation for our »External Tree Description«,
** was made to look and behave like a list-like entity, but built with two distinct
** scopes at implementation level: the attribute scope and the contents scope. This
** carries over to the fine points of the list diff language semantics, especially
** when it comes to fault tolerance and strictness vs fuzziness in diff application.
** The implementation is thus faced with having to deal with an internal focus and
** a switch from scope to scope, which adds a lot of complexity. So the list diff
** application strategy can be seen as blueprint and demonstration of principles.
**
** Another point in question is whether to treat the diff application as
** manipulating a target data structure, or rather building a reshaped copy.
** The fact that GenNode and Record are designed as immutable values seems to favour
** the latter, yet the very reason to engage into building this diff framework was
** how to handle partial updates within a expectedly very large UI model, reflecting
** the actual session model in Proc-Layer. So we end up working on a Mutator,
** which clearly signals we're going to reshape and re-rig the target data.
**
** \par related
** Closely related to this generic application of tree changes is the situation,
** where we want to apply structural changes to some non-generic and private data
** structure. In fact, it is possible to _use the same tree diff language_ for
** this specific case, with the help of an _adapter_. Thus, within our diff
** framework, we provide a _similar binding_ for the DiffApplicator, but
** then targeted towards such an [structure adapter](\ref TreeMutator)
**
** ## State and nested scopes
** Within the level of a single #Record, our tree diff language works similar to
** the list diff (with the addition of the \c after(ID) verb, which is just a
** shortcut to accept parts of the contents unaltered). But after possibly rearranging
** the contents of an "object" (Record), the diff might open some of its child "objects"
** by entering a nested scope. This is done with the \c mut(ID)....emu(ID) bracketing
** construct. On the implementation side, this means we need to use a stack somehow.
** The decision was to manage this stack explicitly, as a std::stack (heap memory).
** Each entry on this stack is a "context frame" for list diff. Which makes the
** tree diff applicator a highly statefull component.
**
** Even more so, since -- for \em performance reasons -- we try to alter the
** tree shaped data structure \em in-place. We want to avoid the copy of possibly
** deep sub-trees, when in the end we might be just rearranging their sequence order.
** This design decision comes at a price tag though
** - it subverts the immutable nature of \c Record<GenNode> and leads to
** high dependency on data layout and implementation details of the latter.
** This is at least prominently marked by working on a diff::Record::Mutator,
** so the client has first to "open up" the otherwise immutable tree
** - the actual list diff on each level works by first \em moving the entire
** Record contents away into a temporary buffer and then \em moving them
** back into new shape one by one. In case of a diff conflict (i.e. a
** mismatch between the actual data structure and the assumptions made
** for the diff message on the sender / generator side), an exception
** is thrown, leaving the client with a possibly corrupted tree, where
** parts might even still be stashed away in the temporary buffer,
** and thus be lost.
** We consider this unfortunate, yet justified by the very nature of applying a diff.
** When the user needs safety or transactional behaviour, a deep copy should be made
** before attaching the #DiffApplicator
**
2016-02-26 17:50:44 +01:00
** @note as of 2/2016, there is the possibility this solution will become part
** of a more generic solution, currently being worked out in tree-diff-mutator-binding.hpp
**
** @see DiffTreeApplication_test
** @see DiffListApplication_test
** @see GenNodeBasic_test
** @see tree-diff.hpp
**
*/
#ifndef LIB_DIFF_TREE_DIFF_APPLICATION_H
#define LIB_DIFF_TREE_DIFF_APPLICATION_H
#include "lib/diff/tree-diff.hpp"
#include "lib/diff/tree-diff-mutator-binding.hpp"
#include "lib/diff/gen-node.hpp"
#include "lib/format-string.hpp"
#include "lib/util.hpp"
#include <utility>
#include <stack>
namespace lib {
namespace diff{
using util::unConst;
using util::cStr;
using util::_Fmt;
using std::move;
using std::swap;
}} // namespace lib::diff
#endif /*LIB_DIFF_TREE_DIFF_APPLICATION_H*/