RfC ApplicationInstall now in draft state
This commit is contained in:
parent
ee97654330
commit
43558d0f01
1 changed files with 15 additions and 3 deletions
|
|
@ -5,7 +5,7 @@ ApplicationInstall
|
|||
|
||||
[grid="all"]
|
||||
`------------`-----------------------
|
||||
*State* _Idea_
|
||||
*State* _Draft_
|
||||
*Date* _Di 11 Jan 2011 17:00:55 CET_
|
||||
*Proposed by* Ichthyostega <prg@ichthyostega.de>
|
||||
-------------------------------------
|
||||
|
|
@ -175,8 +175,8 @@ The second alternative isn't really applicable IMHO. The original UNIX philosoph
|
|||
breeds on an academic setup and really excels with small nifty commandline utils
|
||||
combined by pipes, each specialised to do a single thing very well. These utils
|
||||
are more like the objects within our implementation. The concept of large
|
||||
application software bundles and desktop software was always a bit alien within
|
||||
the classic UNIX environment.
|
||||
application software bundles and desktop software was always a bit alien
|
||||
within the classic UNIX environment.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
@ -209,5 +209,17 @@ Comments
|
|||
--------
|
||||
//comments: append below
|
||||
|
||||
.State -> Draft
|
||||
There is now a complete implementation of this concept on my ``proc'' branch. +
|
||||
Moreover, I was able to define an initial Debian packaging for Lumiera on top
|
||||
of that implementation.
|
||||
|
||||
During that work, I had opportunity to visit various areas of the existing codebase,
|
||||
which reminded me of several small issues, which seem to become unhealthy when lying
|
||||
around unfixed for such a long time. Probably I'll start a clean-up initiative and
|
||||
try to bring these points to discussion separately.
|
||||
|
||||
So 13 Feb 2011 20:04:00 CET Ichthyostega <prg@ichthyostega.de>
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
//endof_comments:
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Reference in a new issue