RFC: new doc structure
This commit is contained in:
parent
bc36b12b99
commit
e476102467
1 changed files with 108 additions and 0 deletions
108
doc/devel/rfc_pending/DeveloperDocumentationStructure.txt
Normal file
108
doc/devel/rfc_pending/DeveloperDocumentationStructure.txt
Normal file
|
|
@ -0,0 +1,108 @@
|
|||
Developer Documentation Structure
|
||||
=================================
|
||||
|
||||
// please don't remove the //word: comments
|
||||
|
||||
[grid="all"]
|
||||
`------------`-----------------------
|
||||
*State* _Idea_
|
||||
*Date* _Mon Aug 2 18:03:25 2010_
|
||||
*Proposed by* Christian Thaeter <ct@pipapo.org>
|
||||
-------------------------------------
|
||||
|
||||
[abstract]
|
||||
********************************************************************************
|
||||
I describe here how to bring the Lumiera Developer Documentation into an simple
|
||||
hierarchical structure. Previously we accumulated a lot Documentation which
|
||||
ended in quite a few different places. This should be tidied up.
|
||||
********************************************************************************
|
||||
|
||||
Description
|
||||
-----------
|
||||
//description: add a detailed description:
|
||||
|
||||
I propose to reorganize the developer documentation in the following way:
|
||||
|
||||
* make a 3 (or more, see below) level documentation structure:
|
||||
1. The entry level becomes the 'Lumiera: The inner Core' document which shall
|
||||
not go into details but give a hint what everything is made for. This
|
||||
will be the first introductional doc for new developers.
|
||||
2. second level are the RFC's which descibe the design as planned on a
|
||||
general level, not going (except for some example snippets) into
|
||||
implementation details.
|
||||
3. the third level is the doxygen documentation which describes what
|
||||
actually got implemented in detail. This can be further split into
|
||||
an external reference and a internal part.
|
||||
|
||||
We using test-driven-development, our tests are our specifications. This leads
|
||||
to the idea that ideas, design and intentions for tests should be documented
|
||||
there too. In a higher level abstract human written form. I propose to use my
|
||||
pipadoc documentation extractor (that means, writing asciidoc within the code as
|
||||
special comments) for this.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Tasks
|
||||
~~~~~
|
||||
// List what would need to be done to implement this Proposal in a few words:
|
||||
// * item ...
|
||||
|
||||
* Go over the old content of the asciidoced tiddlywikis, integrate it either in
|
||||
the "Lumiera: The inner Core" document or write single RFC's for them.
|
||||
* The 'proc' tiddlywiki is a bit special, we need a plan how to integrate this.
|
||||
Possibly making a own document-dir for this, or refactor it in plenty RFC's.
|
||||
This is ichthyos decision.
|
||||
* Decide how to proceed with the UML model
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Pros
|
||||
^^^^
|
||||
// add just a fact list/enumeration which make this suitable:
|
||||
// * foo
|
||||
// * bar ...
|
||||
|
||||
Much easier entry to the whole developer documentation. Reading the "Inner Core"
|
||||
document should be sufficient to get a good idea about the Lumiera design and
|
||||
layout. All details are linked from there and thus easily findable.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Cons
|
||||
^^^^
|
||||
// fact list of the known/considered bad implications:
|
||||
|
||||
There are some open ends yet, doxygen for example doesnt integrate nicely, we
|
||||
possibly can't link to single doxygen entities since these have no permanent
|
||||
link (to my understanding, to be investigated). Other parts like the UML model
|
||||
are not yet decided and moving the other existing content over needs some (not
|
||||
really much) work.
|
||||
|
||||
Alternatives
|
||||
------------
|
||||
//alternatives: explain alternatives and tell why they are not viable:
|
||||
|
||||
Wait for a miracle that our docs become well organized on its own.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Rationale
|
||||
---------
|
||||
//rationale: Describe why it should be done *this* way:
|
||||
|
||||
This approach fits nicely into our overall infrastructure and the way we wanted
|
||||
to do things. Using git and asciidoc mostly, making the developer documentation
|
||||
part of the source tree and reasonable easy available/maintainable to
|
||||
deveoplers.
|
||||
|
||||
//Conclusion
|
||||
//----------
|
||||
//conclusion: When approbate (this proposal becomes a Final)
|
||||
// write some conclusions about its process:
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Comments
|
||||
--------
|
||||
//comments: append below
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
//endof_comments:
|
||||
Loading…
Reference in a new issue