Commit graph

5 commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
806db414dd Copyright: clarify and simplify the file headers
* Lumiera source code always was copyrighted by individual contributors
 * there is no entity "Lumiera.org" which holds any copyrights
 * Lumiera source code is provided under the GPL Version 2+

== Explanations ==
Lumiera as a whole is distributed under Copyleft, GNU General Public License Version 2 or above.
For this to become legally effective, the ''File COPYING in the root directory is sufficient.''

The licensing header in each file is not strictly necessary, yet considered good practice;
attaching a licence notice increases the likeliness that this information is retained
in case someone extracts individual code files. However, it is not by the presence of some
text, that legally binding licensing terms become effective; rather the fact matters that a
given piece of code was provably copyrighted and published under a license. Even reformatting
the code, renaming some variables or deleting parts of the code will not alter this legal
situation, but rather creates a derivative work, which is likewise covered by the GPL!

The most relevant information in the file header is the notice regarding the
time of the first individual copyright claim. By virtue of this initial copyright,
the first author is entitled to choose the terms of licensing. All further
modifications are permitted and covered by the License. The specific wording
or format of the copyright header is not legally relevant, as long as the
intention to publish under the GPL remains clear. The extended wording was
based on a recommendation by the FSF. It can be shortened, because the full terms
of the license are provided alongside the distribution, in the file COPYING.
2024-11-17 23:42:55 +01:00
39d614f55f Library: Testsuite maintenance
- SchedulerStress_test simply takes too long to complete (~4 min)
  and is thus aborted by the testrunner. Add a switch to allow for
  a quick smoke test.

- SchedulerCommutator_test aborts due to an unresolved design problem,
  which I marked as failure

- add some convenience methods for passing arguments to tests
2024-11-16 00:38:57 +01:00
a90b9e5f16 Library: uniform definition scheme for error-IDs
In the Lumiera code base, we use C-String constants as unique error-IDs.
Basically this allows to create new unique error IDs anywhere in the code.

However, definition of such IDs in arbitrary namespaces tends to create
slight confusion and ambiguities, while maintaining the proper use statements
requires some manual work.

Thus I introduce a new **standard scheme**
 * Error-IDs for widespread use shall be defined _exclusively_ into `namespace lumiera::error`
 * The shorthand-Macro `LERR_()` can now be used to simplify inclusion and referral
 * (for local or single-usage errors, a local or even hidden definition is OK)
2024-03-21 19:57:34 +01:00
89d93a13e4 Modernise Unknown Exception handler and Exception messages 2018-04-02 01:48:51 +02:00
fc546f71b4 Reorganise some tests
Dependency-Injection rather fits into the "fundamentals" section.
It is more than a mere library facility
2018-03-31 17:12:45 +02:00
Renamed from tests/library/singleton-subclass-test.cpp (Browse further)