Commit graph

19 commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
20392eee1c clean-up: successfully replaced the old fixed type sequence (closes: #987)
This resolves an intricate problem related to metaprogramming with
variadic templates and function signatures. Due to exceptional complexity,
a direct solution was blocked for several years, and required a better
organisation of the support code involved; several workarounds were
developed, gradually leading to a transition path, which could now
be completed in an focused clean-up effort over the last week.

Metaprogramming with sequences of types is organised into three layers:
- simple tasks can be solved with the standard facilities of the language,
  using pattern match with variadic template specialisations
- the ''type-sequence'' construct `Types<T...>` takes the centre stage
  for the explicit definition of collections of types; it can be re-bound
  to other variadic templates and supports simple direct manipulation
- for more elaborate and advanced processing tasks, a ''Loki-style type list''
  can be obtained from a type-sequence, allowing to perform recursive
  list processing task with a technique similar to LISP.
2025-06-07 18:04:59 +02:00
acc77654d1 clean-up: can now switch remaining downstream usages
after all the relevant library components do support both kinds of
type sequences transparently, any usages in core code can now be
switched over to the new, variadic type sequences.
2025-06-07 01:07:36 +02:00
7aa1698a95 clean-up: prepare for variadic Type-Sequences (see #987)
Attempting to reduce the remaining pre-C++11 workarounds before upgrade to C++20...

As a first step: rename the old type-sequence implementation into `TyOLD`
to make it clearly distinguishable; a new variadic implementation `TySeq`
was already introduced as partial workaround, and the next steps
will be to switch over essential parts of the type-sequence library.
2025-06-02 03:24:44 +02:00
806db414dd Copyright: clarify and simplify the file headers
* Lumiera source code always was copyrighted by individual contributors
 * there is no entity "Lumiera.org" which holds any copyrights
 * Lumiera source code is provided under the GPL Version 2+

== Explanations ==
Lumiera as a whole is distributed under Copyleft, GNU General Public License Version 2 or above.
For this to become legally effective, the ''File COPYING in the root directory is sufficient.''

The licensing header in each file is not strictly necessary, yet considered good practice;
attaching a licence notice increases the likeliness that this information is retained
in case someone extracts individual code files. However, it is not by the presence of some
text, that legally binding licensing terms become effective; rather the fact matters that a
given piece of code was provably copyrighted and published under a license. Even reformatting
the code, renaming some variables or deleting parts of the code will not alter this legal
situation, but rather creates a derivative work, which is likewise covered by the GPL!

The most relevant information in the file header is the notice regarding the
time of the first individual copyright claim. By virtue of this initial copyright,
the first author is entitled to choose the terms of licensing. All further
modifications are permitted and covered by the License. The specific wording
or format of the copyright header is not legally relevant, as long as the
intention to publish under the GPL remains clear. The extended wording was
based on a recommendation by the FSF. It can be shortened, because the full terms
of the license are provided alongside the distribution, in the file COPYING.
2024-11-17 23:42:55 +01:00
0b9e184fa3 Library: replace usages of rand() in the whole code base
* most usages are drop-in replacements
 * occasionally the other convenience functions can be used
 * verify call-paths from core code to identify usages
 * ensure reseeding for all tests involving some kind of randomness...

__Note__: some tests were not yet converted,
since their usage of randomness is actually not thread-safe.
This problem existed previously, since also `rand()` is not thread safe,
albeit in most cases it is possible to ignore this problem, as
''garbled internal state'' is also somehow „random“
2024-11-13 04:23:46 +01:00
155bf95ce5 Doxygen: magically insert a reference to the test class
this bit of Sed magic relies on the fact that we happen to write
the almost correct class name of a test into the header comment.

HOWTO:
for F in $(find tests -type f \( -name '*.cpp' \)  -exec egrep -q '§§TODO§§' {} \; -print);
  do sed -r -i -e'
    2          {h;x;s/\s+(.+)\(Test\).*$/\\ref \1_test/;x};
    /§§TODO§§/ {s/§§TODO§§//;G;s/\n//}'
    $F;
done
2017-02-22 03:17:18 +01:00
24b3bec4be Doxygen: prepare all unit tests for inclusion in the documentation
Doxygen will only process files with a @file documentation comment.
Up to now, none of our test code has such a comment, preventing the
cross-links to unit tests from working.

This is unfortunate, since unit tests, and even the code comments there,
can be considered as the most useful form of technical documentation.
Thus I'll start an initiative to fill in those missing comments automatically
2017-02-22 01:54:20 +01:00
48e9b7594a Doxygen: identify all files lacking a @file comment
reason is, only files with a @file comment will be processed
with further documentation commands. For this reason, our Doxygen
documentation is lacking a lot of entries.

HOWTO:
find src -type f \( -name '*.cpp' -or -name '*.hpp' \) -not -exec egrep -q '\*.+@file' {} \; -print -exec sed -i -r -e'\_\*/_,$ { 1,+0 a\
\
\
/** @file §§§\
 ** TODO §§§\
 */
}' {} \;
2016-11-03 18:20:10 +01:00
bdf48e1b7b WIP: desperate attempt to get out of the design deadlock
Arrrrgh.
I go round in circles since hours now.
Whatever I attempt, it again relies on
yet further unsecured suppositions
2016-02-26 22:57:49 +01:00
ecd1375e92 fix and adjust broken test defintions. Closes #985 2016-01-10 12:25:45 +01:00
2c20d407fc mass clean-up: adapt usage of std::cout pretty much everywhere
- remove unnecessary includes
- expunge all remaining usages of boost::format
- able to leave out the expliti string(elm) in output
- drop various operator<<, since we're now picking up
  custom string conversions automatically
- delete diagnostics headers, which are now largely superfluous
- use newer helper functions occasionally

I didn't blindly change any usage of <iostream> though;
sometimes, just using the output streams right away
seems adequate.
2016-01-07 20:12:46 +01:00
11ca89a2fd cover usage of predicate in unit test 2015-08-29 19:07:51 +02:00
da43d7f00f follow-up to the bugfix: just plain int is yet more readable
basically the 32/64bit problem was caused by things like 23L, which creates a long.
Unfortunately on 64bit platforms, this is aliased to int64_t,
while on 32bit i386, it is a distinct data type, but just 32bit,
like int.

The code in question here is just test / demonstration code
and actually just needs "some integer number". So let's stick
to good old boring int then.
2015-08-27 23:46:12 +02:00
4b2f7ef3ad fix a 32/64 bug
the obnoxious problem with long, which is
only 32bit on 32bit platforms.

incidentally, sitting here at FrOSCon 15
in the Lumiera developers room
2015-08-22 22:20:58 +02:00
5a4290d4a7 TICKET #738: re-implemented Variant functionality complete - unit test pass 2015-04-19 03:18:24 +02:00
7686122354 implementation complete -- kindof works
there is a problem with the virtual assignment,
seems the default policy was picked.

Beyond that, the rest of the unit test passes
2015-04-19 02:02:54 +02:00
c32685ada8 WIP: first round of implementation
finally got all those copy / assgnment flavours straight.

Still unsolved: unable to instantiate the Variant template
for a type with private assignment operator (like e.g. Time )
The problem is our virtual assignement operator, which forces
instantiation of the implementation (for the VTable), even if
the actual assignment is never invoked.
2015-04-17 19:33:25 +02:00
413a6a5d48 outline and stub the API functions. 2015-04-16 23:04:36 +02:00
eb263d44d7 TICKET #738: design API of a new variant implementation
- we do not want type mutations
- we do not want "empty" records ever
- we do not support "probing" for contents
- visitor style access for generic value handling
2015-04-16 20:29:03 +02:00