Commit graph

692 commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
356fe8fd13 change the ContensQuery stub to fit into the QueryResolver in its current form
Actually, the implementation within PlacementIndex is missing.
Moreover, I think now that PlacementIndex shouldn't implement
QueryResolver directly.
2009-11-01 03:47:35 +01:00
2620c38ed9 documentation, close some tickets... 2009-11-01 02:02:21 +01:00
9ff7b1eaeb Implement registration of a resolution function. QueryResolver_test pass 2009-10-30 20:33:44 +01:00
f70f8c4e4a implemented the mechanism for dispatch-to-concrete resolution 2009-10-30 18:37:08 +01:00
f35b422316 SubID: add (preliminary) hash impl; unit test pass 2009-10-30 06:50:26 +01:00
df562a186f oops... fix a bug in Literal's hash function 2009-10-30 05:15:26 +01:00
006392f6ea yet another random test helper 2009-10-30 03:53:51 +01:00
ceb4d4b5ea reworked MultiFact passes unit test. Closes Ticket #376 2009-10-30 00:32:26 +01:00
1dccd37c70 re-order MultiFact implementation to get it to compile 2009-10-29 22:00:17 +01:00
ee611224b6 disable the tests not ready yet (see Ticket 384) 2009-10-29 21:59:25 +01:00
d2721378d5 get QueryResolver to compile 2009-10-29 21:59:02 +01:00
3145064a21 change IterAdapter iteration control API to use free functions 2009-10-29 04:31:16 +01:00
0cef067c11 WIP adapt unit test and the argument-accepting MultiFact specialisation 2009-10-28 04:45:17 +01:00
2530e8c1a1 WIP try to create an extension point to MultiFact, allowing to accept argument(s)
sketch of an idea how to add an extension possibility
without messing up the basic MultiFact template
2009-10-27 05:13:38 +01:00
6dc09e66dc WIP: test-driven brainstorming: how to pass additional factory arguments? (Ticket #377) 2009-10-26 01:42:35 +01:00
ec4b2eef00 WIP: test-driven brainstorming: how to build the query dispatcher table? 2009-10-26 01:39:25 +01:00
5d9671cb2c WIP place a ref-count into the result iterator 2009-10-25 16:18:53 +01:00
eb2d309601 WIP: reworked the design further 2009-10-24 16:03:14 +02:00
c3441ac26a WIP Query<TY> implementation draft... 2009-10-24 00:23:22 +02:00
455ad14ae5 set up some steps which might lead to a solution of the typed-query-problem 2009-10-23 20:09:36 +02:00
90e09b9fa0 WIP trying to get ahed with the problem of issuing queries 2009-10-22 17:24:57 +02:00
452e1bb727 WIP draft an unit test detailing QueryFocus operation 2009-10-20 05:34:58 +02:00
f0c9beb5c6 WIP design the ScopePath API by unit test 2009-10-18 19:08:21 +02:00
2e62a3b01b WIP continue design how to discover session contents 2009-10-17 21:31:03 +02:00
2ca89010d1 introduce pointer-to-PlacementIndex typedef 2009-10-17 21:29:16 +02:00
3b1301be14 WIP stubbed some of the operations to implement on class Scope 2009-10-17 02:16:19 +02:00
a662b176bb WIP test-driven brainstorming: what is a Scope? 2009-10-17 02:15:28 +02:00
9451a6888f start definition of new session::Scope interface 2009-10-16 03:13:57 +02:00
65f100c1a2 start 2 unit tests for scope handling 2009-10-14 06:18:25 +02:00
cd51e5fef0 Proc Command handling frontend finished and usable for now
Additional convenience shortcuts and a bit of polishing.
Closes Ticket #300
2009-10-11 05:57:46 +02:00
c6d5f8a0b4 Proc Command framework: *first integraton round finished* 2009-10-11 05:57:46 +02:00
36d615dd3a add test case covering the string representation of commands 2009-10-11 05:57:46 +02:00
ae01f85452 replace existing implementation with CommandImplCloneBuilder 2009-10-11 05:57:45 +02:00
fdd940feba clone builder implemented; problem resolved according to test 2009-10-11 05:57:45 +02:00
bb7ff5e317 WIP draft of clone builder implementation 2009-10-11 05:57:45 +02:00
7812792f75 unit test showing current malfunction of UNDO state due to cloning 2009-10-11 05:57:45 +02:00
a4ad41a4e9 Idea how to solve the problem with cloning the UNDO functor 2009-10-11 05:57:45 +02:00
0bcbf7fee0 fix further problems uncovered by test; allow for anonymous cloning 2009-10-11 05:57:45 +02:00
17c7160f02 refactor CommandDef, get rid of the possibility of re-defining. YAGNI! 2009-10-11 05:57:45 +02:00
2ad896027b why doesn't the reverse lookup return a Symbol?
damn! I have the vague rememberance that I had a reason for
not returning a Symbol. Anyway, here it goes...
2009-10-11 05:57:44 +02:00
d2acf48587 change semantics of state predicates, as it seems less surprising this way 2009-10-11 05:57:44 +02:00
c8e049cdea Command system basic unit test pass 2009-10-11 05:57:44 +02:00
5861597d7f smash a glorious ref-to-local object bug 2009-10-11 05:57:44 +02:00
4f1c034b58 CommandRegistry: function test pass 2009-10-11 05:57:44 +02:00
07de2a767b implement equality comparison on CommandImpl level 2009-10-11 05:57:44 +02:00
eefc40acb7 command-equality-test finished for now 2009-10-11 05:57:44 +02:00
fea85acd0e equality comparisons on function erasure objects covered
...well, as good as possible, as boost refuses to implement this feature
2009-10-11 05:57:43 +02:00
231278bafe implemented comparison on function erasure, pending test 2009-10-11 05:57:43 +02:00
5068016805 WIP draft how the equality comparison on a function erasure could work 2009-10-11 05:57:43 +02:00
6a737a5838 WIP draft the CommandEquality_test 2009-10-11 05:57:43 +02:00