Commit graph

1156 commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
51a7670425 UiElement: integrate a default implementation based on the Expander functor 2018-09-14 21:06:13 +02:00
04424fb8df UiElement: code and document the functor components 2018-09-14 21:06:13 +02:00
551920e952 UiElement: decide upon the design variant to use for expand() / reveal() (#1162) 2018-09-14 21:06:13 +02:00
17bcdd952a UiElement: design of helper abstractions (#1162)
to strive at a generic implementation for
- expanding/collapsing a widget
- revealing a widget

which obviously somehow involes storing a closure
2018-09-14 21:06:13 +02:00
837c6d11ff NotificationDisplay: solve the problem with space allocation
as it turns out, we need to set the property_expand() on the child widget
within Gtk::Expander explicitly, to cause the child to grab and additional
available screen space (which obviously is what we want in case of a
log display with scrollbars)
2018-09-14 21:06:13 +02:00
bc3eb7f8da NotificationDisplay: experiment to build a collapsed display
basically Gtk::Expander will do the trick.
However, resizing of the enclosing panel is not handled properly,
the log does not expand to take up the available space, as it did
automaticall when just added directly into the frame
2018-09-14 21:06:13 +02:00
a0b80d8a46 NotificationDisplay: preliminary plans regarding information display in the UI
...while traveling with the train over the Schwäbische Alb to Karlsruhe;
on my way to FrOSCon 2018
2018-09-14 21:06:13 +02:00
65bbc45e02 NotificationDisplay: care for lifecycle issues and expansion state persistence 2018-09-14 21:06:13 +02:00
7846460530 NotificationDisplay: code up controller protocol in NotificationHub
...mostly by delegating to (stubbed) functions in ErrorLogDisplay
2018-09-14 21:06:13 +02:00
a151f28d86 NotificationDisplay: solved that nasty topic of dock access for now
phew...
2018-09-14 21:06:13 +02:00
67ac8601d8 DockAccess: implement preliminary simplistic lookup and allocation 2018-09-14 21:06:13 +02:00
76e79c02ee NotificationDisplay: view allocation can be pushed into the access functor
no need to define a private function on Wizard anymore, it just forwards the call
to the service actually implementing the view allocation. For now this is the
PanelLocator (and eventually this will be the ViewLocator / ViewSpecDSL)
2018-09-14 21:06:13 +02:00
855944eff3 NotificationDisplay: turn the error log into an optional display 2018-09-14 21:06:13 +02:00
dcde80c4cd DockAccess: wire the new service through the Wizard 2018-09-14 21:06:13 +02:00
8755153d95 DockAccess: consider a preliminary lookup implementation within PanelLocator
PanelLocator is a sub component of the WindowLocator (top-level GUI service).
Eventually this shall become a mere widget/component access service, with the
actual lookup and allocation logic layered on top through ViewLocator, configurable
via ViewSpec-DSL.

We can not implement the full scheme right now, since we're lacking knowledge
about internals of a typical Lumiera UI widget
2018-09-14 21:06:13 +02:00
c0dca2d978 DockAccess: add lookup-by-Type function to PanelManager
...now the mess multiplies
2018-09-14 21:06:12 +02:00
987aad44c1 DockAccess: add ability to retrieve a panel via PanelManager (#1144)
This is only a premature hack, since the whole structure of PanelManager is somewhat broken.
Moreover, the ViewLocator is not really ready for use yet, so this hack at least
allows us to "reach into" a top-level window and "grab" the pannel we need.
2018-09-14 21:06:12 +02:00
e7e09a642b NotificateDisplay: delegate view allocation through a functor 2018-09-14 21:06:12 +02:00
42cbc9219f NotificateDisplay: link to a widget for error log display
The ErrorLogWidget is allocated and placed elsewhere
and not owned by the NotificationHub controller.
2018-09-14 21:06:12 +02:00
a74dc596ce WLink: finished incl. exception handling guarantees and documentation 2018-09-14 21:06:12 +02:00
ae26012bf5 WLink: implement copy operations
swap-based implementation
not sure if attachTo() should be noexcept
2018-09-14 21:06:12 +02:00
c47e3d0210 WLink: draft basic behaviour 2018-09-14 21:06:12 +02:00
e829a74edf NotificationDisplay: draft idea of managed link-to-widget
a smart-reference based on sigc::trackable
2018-09-14 21:06:12 +02:00
36abe4567e NotificationDisplay: define the actual controller behaviour to be implemented
this is specification work; for now the stubs are marked UNIMPLEMENTED
2018-09-14 21:06:12 +02:00
c2c25f8134 NotificationDisplay: define and include the unique error-Log ID 2018-09-14 21:06:12 +02:00
53c47a6fcc Assets: verify creation of ErrorLog meta-Asset 2018-09-14 21:06:12 +02:00
928b4372e0 Assets: investigating the unclear distinction between asset::Struct and asset::Meta (#1156)
including a kind-of Bugfix: the ctor of TimeGrid erroneously categorised it as asset::Kind STRUCT
2018-09-14 21:06:12 +02:00
1d69bb9050 NotificationDisplay: define a new ErrorLog asset
...for now to serve as placeholder type, used as anchor for the corresponding UI display widget
2018-09-14 21:06:12 +02:00
5475839a49 NotificationDisplay: the question where to define the entity-ID 2018-09-14 21:06:12 +02:00
12244afc90 NotificationDisplay: fill in some default implementation for the controller 2018-09-14 21:06:12 +02:00
0c8151cb2f NotificationDisplay: decide upon the architecture for handling notification messages (#1102)
* have a dedicated "information hub" controller, which acts a receiver of "error log messages" on the UI-Bus
 * let that controller in turn allocate an apropriate view on demand
2018-09-14 21:06:12 +02:00
06b3c382f3 DemoGuiRoundtrip: expand on that idea (#1099) and start analysis how to create that UI component
The goal is to build a (in itself completely meaningless) ping-pong interaction
between the UI and Proc-Layer, for the purpose of driving the integration ahead.

The immediate challenge is how to create and place an apropriate "GuiComponentView",
i.e. a Tangible, which is connected to the UI-Bus with an predictable EntryID.
And the problem is to get that settled right now, without building the envisioned
generic framework for View allocation in the UI. When this is achieved,
it should be a rather small step to actually send those notifications over
the UI-Bus, which is basically implemented and ready by now.
2018-09-14 21:06:12 +02:00
3a100972d7 UI-Lifecycle: send up a dummy notification message to indicate start of content population
right now this will just end up in the log, since not even the
notification display is implemented beyond the GuiNotification-facade.

Anyway, we get some kind of communication now for real, in the actual application
2018-08-04 19:07:21 +02:00
4e77a28112 UI-Lifecycle: use dummy-mechanism to get the new command executed
...because due of #211, we usually don't execute commands yet.
For now there is only the backdoor to prefix the command-ID with "test"

With this change, the TODO message appears now immediately after GUI start!
2018-08-04 18:45:58 +02:00
d58890e2d5 UI-Lifecycle: define a new Proc-Command to implement the population trigger (#1150) 2018-08-04 17:10:04 +02:00
eca06a8309 UI-Lifecycle: build trigger point for content population into InteractionDirector (closes #1151)
In the end, I decided against building a generic service here,
since it pretty much looks like a one-time problem.

Preferrably UI content will be pushed or pulled on demand,
rather than actively coding content from within the UI-Layer
2018-08-04 16:02:00 +02:00
4306e47930 (DOC) GTK start-up internals and design of Lumiera's UI-Layer 2018-08-03 22:33:06 +02:00
7db8bf4c0c UI-Lifecycle: research regarding GTK's activation signal. Document the findings
- activation signal is a facility offered and used solely by Gtk::Application
- we do not need nor want an Gtk::Application, we deal with our own application
  concerns as we see fit.
2018-08-03 19:28:12 +02:00
f33573daec UI-Lifecycle: note down reference point for this task in Gtk::Application
Gio::Application holds a signal_activation(), which seems to be used for
precisely that task we need here: to do something right after the UI is operative
2018-08-03 01:48:08 +02:00
d3daed9a18 UI-Lifecycle: invstigate where to issue the trigger (#1151) 2018-08-02 19:59:26 +02:00
9a39781667 UI-Lifecycle: draft a plan how to trigger content population
...and while doing so, also re-check the state of the GTK toolkit initialisation.
Looks like we're still future-proof, while cunningly avoiding all this
Gnome-style "Application" blurb
2018-07-28 19:01:23 +02:00
0c5a0fed6a UI-Lifecycle: verify and rectify start-up sequence (#1147)
...still not entirely decided yet where to plant the mechanism for
UI content retrieval (#1150)
2018-07-14 19:39:00 +02:00
c24778132e After a long break (LAC.2018 Berlin) -- start planning the next steps
I will abandon work on the ViewSpec DSL in current shape (everything fine with that)
and instead work on a general UI start-up and content population sequence.
From there, my intention is to return to the docks, the placement of views
and then finally to the TimelineView
2018-07-12 21:32:41 +02:00
5cac40654f DockAccess: draft code reorganisation (#1144) 2018-06-17 15:09:52 +02:00
8097485dbf ViewSpec: integrate the simple View access case (Unit test PASS)
This finishes the first round of design drafts in this area.
Right now it seems difficult to get any further, since most of
the actual view creation and management in the UI is not yet coded.
2018-06-15 18:02:08 +02:00
800fc5915a ViewSpec: recast the ElementAccess API to work around the design problem
...it is not really solved, rather postponed.
But who knows. Maybe it's already good enough...
2018-06-15 16:42:51 +02:00
2e8bc9227a ViewSpec: analysis of design alternatives
looks like I'm trapped with the choice between a convoluted API design
and an braindead and inefficient implementation. I am leaning towards the latter
2018-06-15 01:51:10 +02:00
f55a8f606b ...one month later: pick up after the LAC.18 Berlin
...happened to be completely absorbed by the preparations
for my workshop about Yoshimi and musical presets
2018-06-14 17:02:34 +02:00
64b45a41c9 ViewSpec: some more musing...
the damn thing is: now we get three consecutive accesses for each invocation.
This starts looking really dumb
2018-06-14 15:15:08 +02:00
363d24ba91 ViewSpec: unsuccessful atempt to implement the allocator token
looks like we're hitting a design mismatch here....

...and unfortunately I have to abandon this task now and concentrate
on preparation of my talk at LAC.2018 in June
2018-06-14 15:13:06 +02:00