Commit graph

87 commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
37384f1b68 formatting wrapper/frontend: unit test pass.
Closes #166
2011-12-31 06:48:26 +01:00
77548e74c6 document a weakness of boost::hash for strings 2011-12-03 03:18:03 +01:00
d9f84a9bfd clean up lib/meta namespaces 2011-12-03 03:15:59 +01:00
b9d1899486 cleanup: rectify Proc-Layer namespaces (II) 2011-12-02 17:50:44 +01:00
f7a3fdb7a5 fix further test glitches (due to using real random numbers now) 2011-10-23 22:06:32 +02:00
2099ecbcac finish and comment the new time::Control facility 2011-09-25 19:25:55 +02:00
fec2d25b52 additional quantisation and duration canges covered and passing test 2011-09-25 19:25:54 +02:00
a1427bb0b9 next challenge: expected behaviour for quantised source/target values 2011-09-25 19:25:54 +02:00
15a3694cca more complete unit test pass 2011-09-25 19:25:54 +02:00
92dbedc289 intensify the unit-test... 2011-09-25 19:25:53 +02:00
b54cd2c722 cont. defining time::Control special cases
the refactoring seems to work out OK, was able
to cover all the cases defined thus far....
2011-09-25 19:25:53 +02:00
a8fd0bf7c5 better avoid throwing and use a default time grid in some cases 2011-09-25 19:25:53 +02:00
47afbbeab0 first attempt towards covering the various special cases
the intention is to generate most combinations from
generic template cases, but to define the difficult
cases by explicit specialisation
2011-09-25 19:25:53 +02:00
eed2b0f320 time::Control simple unit test pass 2011-09-25 19:25:52 +02:00
c96cd66688 draft implementation for time change and propagation 2011-09-25 19:25:52 +02:00
27533c3bb9 WIP darft usage for the new time::Control (life change) element 2011-09-25 19:25:52 +02:00
ae36b2d941 stubs and adjustments to get it through the compiler 2011-09-25 19:25:52 +02:00
eb5e0ab9ff WIP: start building a Test for time::Control. Need Cartesian product of cases... 2011-09-25 19:25:51 +02:00
9004818d63 further planning the features of time::Change 2011-09-25 19:25:51 +02:00
b6f81d1e1e Fix problems discovered by compiling with gcc 4.4 2011-05-21 07:08:17 +02:00
46c9811184 adapt the unit-tests to use the new Time framework 2011-05-16 08:38:27 +02:00
481875a78a add check for time point contained in TimeSpan 2011-05-16 04:02:26 +02:00
3e28c870f5 Finish basic Time mutations, unit test pass 2011-05-15 04:19:27 +02:00
4bf53bba0f code unit test to demonstrate full time/timecode usage cycle 2011-05-15 04:19:27 +02:00
f85c86d6c8 parsing fractional seconds: unit test pass 2011-05-15 04:19:27 +02:00
c7bb7154a7 draft a test to cover parsing of timecode values 2011-05-15 04:19:27 +02:00
6b1b6cb805 draft how to integrate parsing of timecode formats 2011-05-15 04:19:27 +02:00
80f7dba334 WIP some comments and considerations 2011-05-15 04:19:26 +02:00
af1561068e definitions and stubs to make it compile 2011-05-15 04:19:26 +02:00
bf61ff7248 WIP test-driven brainstorming: nudge by grid 2011-05-15 04:19:26 +02:00
2035405251 add time Mutation to adjust by offset 2011-05-15 04:19:26 +02:00
baf601c16b first time mutation test cases pass 2011-05-15 04:19:25 +02:00
4d6bb3d54c design outline for a limited time::Mutation capability 2011-05-15 04:19:24 +02:00
9364d717b0 implement total order on time intervals 2011-05-15 04:19:24 +02:00
0e4ed856d7 WIP: get back into the topic of time value mutations
start drafting a unit test....
2011-05-15 04:19:24 +02:00
9eb4f66372 draft more convenience handling for TimeSpan 2011-05-15 04:19:24 +02:00
ab72b528c8 draft test for changing time specs 2011-05-15 04:19:22 +02:00
b843546922 cumulated build/release fixes
up to corresponding debian/0.pre.01-3
- compile issue (digxel.hpp)
- SCons missing config dependency on test-only
- 32/64bit fixes
2011-03-31 18:43:50 +02:00
faf579c4c5 enforce generally imutable time values 2011-01-22 23:20:12 +01:00
dea026cfd9 omit the Digxel timing measurments from test suite 2011-01-22 18:44:03 +01:00
7b783e885a more thorhoug testing of denormalised values
...uncovered yet more bugs.. yay!
2011-01-22 18:35:04 +01:00
acc7a19fbd Fix: now able to handle negative extended SMPTE
changed the order of propagation when wrapping
the individual digxels of the SMPTE Timecode
2011-01-22 14:41:58 +01:00
ac9e9a99df change the way the Digxel mutator is invoked
this refactoring prepares a change to address
the problems with negative extended SMPTE Timecode
2011-01-22 14:04:43 +01:00
14f233f83b WIP: some more test coverage ... unveiling yet more bugs 2011-01-22 02:35:58 +01:00
9d75739089 SMPTE Timecode (without drop frame) unit test pass 2011-01-21 20:24:41 +01:00
1a07cc9bb2 SMPTE Timecode: first round of debugging and testing 2011-01-21 16:22:01 +01:00
1b79b4a937 fix regression 2011-01-20 21:39:17 +01:00
e1c025778b Digxel: ensure the mutator functor is also called on increment 2011-01-19 11:47:14 +01:00
95a1687a5b draft how a SMPTE-Timecode element could be implemented
passes Compiler, but thats about all...
2011-01-18 05:01:25 +01:00
ce420a1570 special digxel to represent the sign 2011-01-18 04:59:40 +01:00