bdb8bc2c98
move PlacementIndex into namespace session
2009-11-06 19:27:53 +01:00
bb8c018214
integrate QueryFocus with the new ContentsQuery facility
2009-11-06 18:42:15 +01:00
e0e9b7c2c0
WIP about how to link the QueryFocus system to the session/PlacementIndex
2009-11-04 04:56:25 +01:00
8c7727704c
Finish ContentQuery definition; relying on PlacementIndex
2009-11-02 07:37:15 +01:00
356fe8fd13
change the ContensQuery stub to fit into the QueryResolver in its current form
...
Actually, the implementation within PlacementIndex is missing.
Moreover, I think now that PlacementIndex shouldn't implement
QueryResolver directly.
2009-11-01 03:47:35 +01:00
2620c38ed9
documentation, close some tickets...
2009-11-01 02:02:21 +01:00
9ff7b1eaeb
Implement registration of a resolution function. QueryResolver_test pass
2009-10-30 20:33:44 +01:00
f70f8c4e4a
implemented the mechanism for dispatch-to-concrete resolution
2009-10-30 18:37:08 +01:00
d2721378d5
get QueryResolver to compile
2009-10-29 21:59:02 +01:00
54aa7b4afe
WIP fixes and stubbing to get at compiling the MultiFact
2009-10-29 04:32:00 +01:00
ec4b2eef00
WIP: test-driven brainstorming: how to build the query dispatcher table?
2009-10-26 01:39:25 +01:00
5968d35cdf
WIP maybe resolved now the knot in my design...?
2009-10-25 21:39:02 +01:00
5d9671cb2c
WIP place a ref-count into the result iterator
2009-10-25 16:18:53 +01:00
c3441ac26a
WIP Query<TY> implementation draft...
2009-10-24 00:23:22 +02:00
452e1bb727
WIP draft an unit test detailing QueryFocus operation
2009-10-20 05:34:58 +02:00
f01da49955
WIP planning the operations needed on QueryFocus
2009-10-20 04:31:50 +02:00
f0c9beb5c6
WIP design the ScopePath API by unit test
2009-10-18 19:08:21 +02:00
474c293197
first shot at Ticket #355 : use a default-constructed "invalid" PlacementRef
...
Making PlacementRef default constructible this way
would resolve the immediate problems; as any access
goes through an index lookup and thus will throw.
The bool check on this special ref yields false,
so this solution seems to fill the bill.
2009-10-18 01:30:43 +02:00
2e62a3b01b
WIP continue design how to discover session contents
2009-10-17 21:31:03 +02:00
2ca89010d1
introduce pointer-to-PlacementIndex typedef
2009-10-17 21:29:16 +02:00
3b1301be14
WIP stubbed some of the operations to implement on class Scope
2009-10-17 02:16:19 +02:00
cfc17e75ba
refined and clarified planning of Scope and QueryFocus
2009-10-16 21:20:30 +02:00
9451a6888f
start definition of new session::Scope interface
2009-10-16 03:13:57 +02:00
edbd54b062
Initial planning regaring the QueryFocus
2009-10-14 05:48:24 +02:00
193fd2d66b
Start the new Session structure with Timeline and Sequences
2009-10-14 05:39:49 +02:00
cd51e5fef0
Proc Command handling frontend finished and usable for now
...
Additional convenience shortcuts and a bit of polishing.
Closes Ticket #300
2009-10-11 05:57:46 +02:00
c6d5f8a0b4
Proc Command framework: *first integraton round finished*
2009-10-11 05:57:46 +02:00
ae01f85452
replace existing implementation with CommandImplCloneBuilder
2009-10-11 05:57:45 +02:00
fdd940feba
clone builder implemented; problem resolved according to test
2009-10-11 05:57:45 +02:00
e32044e453
refactor CmdClosure to accept a cloneBuilder visitor
2009-10-11 05:57:45 +02:00
bb7ff5e317
WIP draft of clone builder implementation
2009-10-11 05:57:45 +02:00
a4ad41a4e9
Idea how to solve the problem with cloning the UNDO functor
2009-10-11 05:57:45 +02:00
0bcbf7fee0
fix further problems uncovered by test; allow for anonymous cloning
2009-10-11 05:57:45 +02:00
17c7160f02
refactor CommandDef, get rid of the possibility of re-defining. YAGNI!
2009-10-11 05:57:45 +02:00
37cd451367
fix sloppy definition of less-than comparison, which caused malfunction of registry
2009-10-11 05:57:45 +02:00
2ad896027b
why doesn't the reverse lookup return a Symbol?
...
damn! I have the vague rememberance that I had a reason for
not returning a Symbol. Anyway, here it goes...
2009-10-11 05:57:44 +02:00
d2acf48587
change semantics of state predicates, as it seems less surprising this way
2009-10-11 05:57:44 +02:00
95db5f9840
clarify state predicates in conjunction with command lifecycle
2009-10-11 05:57:44 +02:00
c8e049cdea
Command system basic unit test pass
2009-10-11 05:57:44 +02:00
5861597d7f
smash a glorious ref-to-local object bug
2009-10-11 05:57:44 +02:00
4f1c034b58
CommandRegistry: function test pass
2009-10-11 05:57:44 +02:00
07de2a767b
implement equality comparison on CommandImpl level
2009-10-11 05:57:44 +02:00
231278bafe
implemented comparison on function erasure, pending test
2009-10-11 05:57:43 +02:00
5068016805
WIP draft how the equality comparison on a function erasure could work
2009-10-11 05:57:43 +02:00
96d5ce74c4
Ticket #292 : outline unit test explicitly covering equality comparisions
2009-10-11 05:57:43 +02:00
4c3fc9e64d
WIP getting CommandRegistry_test to run
...
(equality on CommandImpl is still missing)
2009-10-11 05:57:43 +02:00
39f50b548c
Ticket #266 : simplify and combine the bind(...) mixin templates into a single header
2009-10-11 05:57:43 +02:00
2aac4e8ea0
remove spurious AcceptArgumentBinding mixin from ArgumentHolder
...
it's an implementation class, after all, and doesn't need a convenience API
2009-10-11 05:57:43 +02:00
abd23ae399
TypedAllocationManager (frontend) now in lib:: -- unit test pass
2009-10-11 05:57:43 +02:00
cb7c884293
handling patterns usable for now. Close #275
2009-10-11 05:57:42 +02:00
