|
|
c3b8d39507
|
refactoring into two distinct concepts. maybe solution?
|
2009-07-05 22:05:11 +02:00 |
|
|
|
e2bb2c440c
|
use OpaqueHolder to solve the problem with the function type erasure...
...tried to use 2 policies, but doesn't work correct (and is uggly)
|
2009-07-05 03:38:33 +02:00 |
|
|
|
4d1f45fc43
|
activate the new test, some comments
|
2009-07-05 02:26:59 +02:00 |
|
|
|
6e3bfb08e6
|
OpaqueHolder implemented and passes unit test
|
2009-07-04 19:30:54 +02:00 |
|
|
|
077d3d176e
|
WIP implementation draft
|
2009-07-04 04:35:17 +02:00 |
|
|
|
3cc49d0f68
|
need to factor out a special holder class to solve the problem with the empty check
|
2009-07-04 03:32:15 +02:00 |
|