Commit graph

243 commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
c6d5f8a0b4 Proc Command framework: *first integraton round finished* 2009-10-11 05:57:46 +02:00
36d615dd3a add test case covering the string representation of commands 2009-10-11 05:57:46 +02:00
ae01f85452 replace existing implementation with CommandImplCloneBuilder 2009-10-11 05:57:45 +02:00
fdd940feba clone builder implemented; problem resolved according to test 2009-10-11 05:57:45 +02:00
bb7ff5e317 WIP draft of clone builder implementation 2009-10-11 05:57:45 +02:00
7812792f75 unit test showing current malfunction of UNDO state due to cloning 2009-10-11 05:57:45 +02:00
a4ad41a4e9 Idea how to solve the problem with cloning the UNDO functor 2009-10-11 05:57:45 +02:00
0bcbf7fee0 fix further problems uncovered by test; allow for anonymous cloning 2009-10-11 05:57:45 +02:00
17c7160f02 refactor CommandDef, get rid of the possibility of re-defining. YAGNI! 2009-10-11 05:57:45 +02:00
2ad896027b why doesn't the reverse lookup return a Symbol?
damn! I have the vague rememberance that I had a reason for
not returning a Symbol. Anyway, here it goes...
2009-10-11 05:57:44 +02:00
d2acf48587 change semantics of state predicates, as it seems less surprising this way 2009-10-11 05:57:44 +02:00
c8e049cdea Command system basic unit test pass 2009-10-11 05:57:44 +02:00
5861597d7f smash a glorious ref-to-local object bug 2009-10-11 05:57:44 +02:00
4f1c034b58 CommandRegistry: function test pass 2009-10-11 05:57:44 +02:00
07de2a767b implement equality comparison on CommandImpl level 2009-10-11 05:57:44 +02:00
eefc40acb7 command-equality-test finished for now 2009-10-11 05:57:44 +02:00
231278bafe implemented comparison on function erasure, pending test 2009-10-11 05:57:43 +02:00
5068016805 WIP draft how the equality comparison on a function erasure could work 2009-10-11 05:57:43 +02:00
6a737a5838 WIP draft the CommandEquality_test 2009-10-11 05:57:43 +02:00
96d5ce74c4 Ticket #292: outline unit test explicitly covering equality comparisions 2009-10-11 05:57:43 +02:00
4c3fc9e64d WIP getting CommandRegistry_test to run
(equality on CommandImpl is still missing)
2009-10-11 05:57:43 +02:00
39f50b548c Ticket #266: simplify and combine the bind(...) mixin templates into a single header 2009-10-11 05:57:43 +02:00
2aac4e8ea0 remove spurious AcceptArgumentBinding mixin from ArgumentHolder
it's an implementation class, after all, and doesn't need a convenience API
2009-10-11 05:57:43 +02:00
cb7c884293 handling patterns usable for now. Close #275 2009-10-11 05:57:42 +02:00
8136b0a4b8 HandlingPattern: basic unit test pass 2009-10-11 05:57:42 +02:00
8c21f21acc namespace cleanup: bring Singleton and Factory into lib:: 2009-10-11 05:57:41 +02:00
e9b95e47cf Command handling pattern? test-driven brainstorming 2009-10-11 05:57:40 +02:00
18c357eb4a start using Symbol datatype instead of a disguised char* 2009-10-11 05:57:38 +02:00
c9f3a345dc WIP towards CommandRegistry implementation 2009-10-11 05:51:31 +02:00
246c535569 Rewrite CmdClosure to actually invoke rather then to create a tr1::bind term
basically this should close Ticket #205  (some details missing)
2009-09-21 03:15:06 +02:00
fd7337f801 WIP drastically simplify command-mutation.
As we're using now a command frontend interface and
and CommandImpl frame in the Registry, most of the
functionaliry on Mutation's interface is superfluous.
Additionally, this separates Mutation and Closure.
2009-09-20 18:37:20 +02:00
6fc7aedd95 Merge NoBug-release related additions
Merge branch 'master' into builder
2009-09-05 19:16:13 +02:00
70b4b0ad41 Fix some more format warnings 2009-09-05 19:11:17 +02:00
1969adaf02 Integration of Builder/NodeFactory implementation draft. Stubbed to pass compiler 2009-09-05 18:15:58 +02:00
1430965798 WIP: implementation of a node fabrication code path 2009-09-05 04:10:51 +02:00
Christian Thaeter
f73cc47da6 Fix all things which broke compilation with NoBug 200909.1 2009-09-04 08:53:03 +02:00
391181e699 WIP some further musing about how to do a simple invocation for unit testing ProcNode 2009-09-04 01:59:44 +02:00
ddb8805a73 WIP attempt to nail down a very simple example... 2009-08-31 01:32:53 +02:00
c89726e2d8 WIP set up some new tests for brainstorming... 2009-08-31 00:49:08 +02:00
4214284d35 accessing the frameID from within the pull() call 2009-08-29 12:26:47 +02:00
06000769e2 re-read the code concerning the pull()-call, fix obvious mismatches, comment, plan... 2009-08-29 12:23:41 +02:00
563d88c955 clean up unneccessary import 2009-08-29 12:23:40 +02:00
1b4aa98cdf use the new stream type definitions to get ahead with the builder work 2009-08-29 12:19:26 +02:00
4acb42d272 autotools fixes... 2009-08-19 15:36:03 +02:00
a845a4d234 unit test covering the cmd registry 2009-08-11 08:35:37 +02:00
5988b1d697 clean up command interface 2009-08-10 01:30:59 +02:00
b6246cbb10 rename the operation "closeArguments", which is more to the point 2009-08-04 02:24:47 +02:00
853aff1228 fixed and stubbed until it passes compiler again 2009-08-02 20:57:04 +02:00
327cbc822a WIP extended binding and invocation to support the convenience shortcuts 2009-08-02 20:55:43 +02:00
4236d0649a WIP: implement the basic operation of execution pattern 2009-08-02 18:00:03 +02:00