|
|
c96cd66688
|
draft implementation for time change and propagation
|
2011-09-25 19:25:52 +02:00 |
|
|
|
3f1b7651e9
|
GPL header whitespace
|
2010-12-17 23:28:49 +01:00 |
|
|
|
9473fd3d67
|
OutputDesignation implementation draft
|
2010-11-19 05:01:43 +01:00 |
|
|
|
231278bafe
|
implemented comparison on function erasure, pending test
|
2009-10-11 05:57:43 +02:00 |
|
|
|
5068016805
|
WIP draft how the equality comparison on a function erasure could work
|
2009-10-11 05:57:43 +02:00 |
|
|
|
3ecd8047df
|
assertion to guard buffer size limit
|
2009-07-19 00:41:37 +02:00 |
|
|
|
584878e0f8
|
yet another variation of managing an object in-place
|
2009-07-18 22:07:46 +02:00 |
|
|
|
9aa5ba560c
|
finish and tidy up control::Mutation, unit test pass
|
2009-07-10 19:04:01 +02:00 |
|
|
|
2462dee5ca
|
issue resolved, tests pass, finally (whew)
|
2009-07-06 02:25:19 +02:00 |
|
|
|
c3b8d39507
|
refactoring into two distinct concepts. maybe solution?
|
2009-07-05 22:05:11 +02:00 |
|
|
|
e2bb2c440c
|
use OpaqueHolder to solve the problem with the function type erasure...
...tried to use 2 policies, but doesn't work correct (and is uggly)
|
2009-07-05 03:38:33 +02:00 |
|
|
|
4d1f45fc43
|
activate the new test, some comments
|
2009-07-05 02:26:59 +02:00 |
|
|
|
6e3bfb08e6
|
OpaqueHolder implemented and passes unit test
|
2009-07-04 19:30:54 +02:00 |
|
|
|
077d3d176e
|
WIP implementation draft
|
2009-07-04 04:35:17 +02:00 |
|
|
|
3cc49d0f68
|
need to factor out a special holder class to solve the problem with the empty check
|
2009-07-04 03:32:15 +02:00 |
|
