9ff7b1eaeb
Implement registration of a resolution function. QueryResolver_test pass
2009-10-30 20:33:44 +01:00
f70f8c4e4a
implemented the mechanism for dispatch-to-concrete resolution
2009-10-30 18:37:08 +01:00
f35b422316
SubID: add (preliminary) hash impl; unit test pass
2009-10-30 06:50:26 +01:00
df562a186f
oops... fix a bug in Literal's hash function
2009-10-30 05:15:26 +01:00
006392f6ea
yet another random test helper
2009-10-30 03:53:51 +01:00
ceb4d4b5ea
reworked MultiFact passes unit test. Closes Ticket #376
2009-10-30 00:32:26 +01:00
1dccd37c70
re-order MultiFact implementation to get it to compile
2009-10-29 22:00:17 +01:00
d2721378d5
get QueryResolver to compile
2009-10-29 21:59:02 +01:00
54aa7b4afe
WIP fixes and stubbing to get at compiling the MultiFact
2009-10-29 04:32:00 +01:00
3145064a21
change IterAdapter iteration control API to use free functions
2009-10-29 04:31:16 +01:00
0cef067c11
WIP adapt unit test and the argument-accepting MultiFact specialisation
2009-10-28 04:45:17 +01:00
2530e8c1a1
WIP try to create an extension point to MultiFact, allowing to accept argument(s)
...
sketch of an idea how to add an extension possibility
without messing up the basic MultiFact template
2009-10-27 05:13:38 +01:00
ec4b2eef00
WIP: test-driven brainstorming: how to build the query dispatcher table?
2009-10-26 01:39:25 +01:00
5968d35cdf
WIP maybe resolved now the knot in my design...?
2009-10-25 21:39:02 +01:00
5d9671cb2c
WIP place a ref-count into the result iterator
2009-10-25 16:18:53 +01:00
c3441ac26a
WIP Query<TY> implementation draft...
2009-10-24 00:23:22 +02:00
452e1bb727
WIP draft an unit test detailing QueryFocus operation
2009-10-20 05:34:58 +02:00
f01da49955
WIP planning the operations needed on QueryFocus
2009-10-20 04:31:50 +02:00
f0c9beb5c6
WIP design the ScopePath API by unit test
2009-10-18 19:08:21 +02:00
474c293197
first shot at Ticket #355 : use a default-constructed "invalid" PlacementRef
...
Making PlacementRef default constructible this way
would resolve the immediate problems; as any access
goes through an index lookup and thus will throw.
The bool check on this special ref yields false,
so this solution seems to fill the bill.
2009-10-18 01:30:43 +02:00
2e62a3b01b
WIP continue design how to discover session contents
2009-10-17 21:31:03 +02:00
2ca89010d1
introduce pointer-to-PlacementIndex typedef
2009-10-17 21:29:16 +02:00
b03577ea3f
document the stipulations lib::IterAdapter puts on his parameter types
2009-10-17 15:40:37 +02:00
3b1301be14
WIP stubbed some of the operations to implement on class Scope
2009-10-17 02:16:19 +02:00
cfc17e75ba
refined and clarified planning of Scope and QueryFocus
2009-10-16 21:20:30 +02:00
9451a6888f
start definition of new session::Scope interface
2009-10-16 03:13:57 +02:00
edbd54b062
Initial planning regaring the QueryFocus
2009-10-14 05:48:24 +02:00
193fd2d66b
Start the new Session structure with Timeline and Sequences
2009-10-14 05:39:49 +02:00
cd51e5fef0
Proc Command handling frontend finished and usable for now
...
Additional convenience shortcuts and a bit of polishing.
Closes Ticket #300
2009-10-11 05:57:46 +02:00
c6d5f8a0b4
Proc Command framework: *first integraton round finished*
2009-10-11 05:57:46 +02:00
ae01f85452
replace existing implementation with CommandImplCloneBuilder
2009-10-11 05:57:45 +02:00
fdd940feba
clone builder implemented; problem resolved according to test
2009-10-11 05:57:45 +02:00
e32044e453
refactor CmdClosure to accept a cloneBuilder visitor
2009-10-11 05:57:45 +02:00
bb7ff5e317
WIP draft of clone builder implementation
2009-10-11 05:57:45 +02:00
7812792f75
unit test showing current malfunction of UNDO state due to cloning
2009-10-11 05:57:45 +02:00
a4ad41a4e9
Idea how to solve the problem with cloning the UNDO functor
2009-10-11 05:57:45 +02:00
0bcbf7fee0
fix further problems uncovered by test; allow for anonymous cloning
2009-10-11 05:57:45 +02:00
17c7160f02
refactor CommandDef, get rid of the possibility of re-defining. YAGNI!
2009-10-11 05:57:45 +02:00
37cd451367
fix sloppy definition of less-than comparison, which caused malfunction of registry
2009-10-11 05:57:45 +02:00
2ad896027b
why doesn't the reverse lookup return a Symbol?
...
damn! I have the vague rememberance that I had a reason for
not returning a Symbol. Anyway, here it goes...
2009-10-11 05:57:44 +02:00
d2acf48587
change semantics of state predicates, as it seems less surprising this way
2009-10-11 05:57:44 +02:00
95db5f9840
clarify state predicates in conjunction with command lifecycle
2009-10-11 05:57:44 +02:00
c8e049cdea
Command system basic unit test pass
2009-10-11 05:57:44 +02:00
5861597d7f
smash a glorious ref-to-local object bug
2009-10-11 05:57:44 +02:00
4f1c034b58
CommandRegistry: function test pass
2009-10-11 05:57:44 +02:00
07de2a767b
implement equality comparison on CommandImpl level
2009-10-11 05:57:44 +02:00
fea85acd0e
equality comparisons on function erasure objects covered
...
...well, as good as possible, as boost refuses to implement this feature
2009-10-11 05:57:43 +02:00
231278bafe
implemented comparison on function erasure, pending test
2009-10-11 05:57:43 +02:00
5068016805
WIP draft how the equality comparison on a function erasure could work
2009-10-11 05:57:43 +02:00
96d5ce74c4
Ticket #292 : outline unit test explicitly covering equality comparisions
2009-10-11 05:57:43 +02:00
