/* CommandMutation(Test) - checking the functor and undo-functor used within Proc-commands Copyright (C) Lumiera.org 2009, Hermann Vosseler This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the License, or (at your option) any later version. This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the GNU General Public License for more details. You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License along with this program; if not, write to the Free Software Foundation, Inc., 675 Mass Ave, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA. * *****************************************************/ #include "lib/test/run.hpp" #include "proc/control/command-mutation.hpp" #include "proc/control/memento-tie.hpp" #include "lib/meta/typelist.hpp" #include "lib/meta/tuple.hpp" #include #include #include #include using std::tr1::function; using std::string; using std::rand; using std::cout; using std::endl; namespace control { namespace test { using namespace lumiera::typelist; using control::CmdClosure; namespace { /* ======= test functions to bind ========= */ int testVal=0; ///< used to verify the effect of testFunc void testFunc (int val) { testVal += val; } int capture () { return testVal; } } /*************************************************************************** * Verify the behaviour of the type erased closure, which is used * by Proc-Layer commands to implement the capturing and later * re-invocation of a function. * * @see control::Command * @see control::CommandDef * @see control::Mutation * @see control::UndoMutation * @see command-basic-test.hpp */ class CommandMutation_test : public Test { virtual void run (Arg) { checkMutation(); checkUndoMutation(); checkStateCapturingMechanism(); } /** @test check the Mutation functor which is bound to our \c testFunc(int) . * Then close this Mutation by providing a parameter tuple. * Verify finally that by invoking the Mutation functor * actually \c testFunc(param) is executed. */ void checkMutation () { function funky = testFunc; Mutation functor (funky); ASSERT (!functor); VERIFY_ERROR (UNBOUND_ARGUMENTS, functor() ); cout << functor << endl; Tuple > param = tuple::make(23); Closure close_over (param); CmdClosure& clo (close_over); functor.close(clo); ASSERT (functor); cout << "param values: " << clo << endl; cout << functor << endl; testVal = 0; functor(); ASSERT (testVal == 23); functor(); ASSERT (testVal == 2*23); } /** @test check the special Mutation which is used to \em undo a command. * This time, we use our \c testFunc(int) as implementation of the * "undo" function; thus its parameter has now the meaning of an * captured state value. Consequently this time the \em operation * which is to be undone would have the signature \c void(void) . * Obviously this is a rather silly "undo" function, but it is * easy to check for unit testing. To carry out this test, we * first have to trigger the state capturing mechanism; after that, * invoking the UndoMutation will call the testFunc with the * previously captured state. * @note Mutation and UndoMutation are value objects, but they refer * to a common command state, which for this test is modelled * by local variables and which for the real commands is * contained in a CommandArgumentHolder */ void checkUndoMutation () { function undo_func = testFunc; function cap_func = capture; typedef MementoTie MemHolder; MemHolder mementoHolder (undo_func,cap_func); UndoMutation undoFunctor (mementoHolder); ASSERT (!undoFunctor); ASSERT (!mementoHolder); VERIFY_ERROR (UNBOUND_ARGUMENTS, undoFunctor() ); Tuple > param; Closure clo (param); undoFunctor.close(clo); ASSERT ( undoFunctor); ASSERT (!mementoHolder); VERIFY_ERROR (MISSING_MEMENTO, undoFunctor() ); VERIFY_ERROR (MISSING_MEMENTO, mementoHolder.getState() ); testVal = 11; undoFunctor.captureState(); ASSERT (mementoHolder); ASSERT (testVal == 11); int mem = mementoHolder.getState(); cout << "saved state: " << mem << endl; undoFunctor(); ASSERT (testVal == 11 + 11); undoFunctor(); ASSERT (testVal == 11 + 11 + 11); undoFunctor.captureState(); ASSERT (33 == mementoHolder.getState()); undoFunctor(); ASSERT (testVal == 33 + 33); testVal = 9; undoFunctor(); ASSERT (testVal == 42); UndoMutation clonedFunc (undoFunctor); // refers to the same state ASSERT (clonedFunc); ASSERT (33 == mementoHolder.getState()); clonedFunc.captureState(); ASSERT (42 == mementoHolder.getState()); // and captures into the same storage testVal = 0; clonedFunc(); ASSERT (testVal == 42); } /** @test check the undo memento capturing mechanism in isolation * @see memento-tie-test.cpp more in-depth coverage */ void checkStateCapturingMechanism () { typedef MementoTie MemHolder; MemHolder mementoHolder (testFunc, capture); function bound_undo_func = mementoHolder.tieUndoFunc(); function bound_cap_func = mementoHolder.tieCaptureFunc(); int rr (rand() % 100); testVal = rr; bound_cap_func(); // invoke state capturing ASSERT (rr == mementoHolder.getState()); testVal = 10; // meanwhile "somehow" mutate the state bound_undo_func(); // invoking the undo() feeds back the memento ASSERT (testVal == 10+rr); } }; /** Register this test class... */ LAUNCHER (CommandMutation_test, "unit controller"); }} // namespace control::test