/* IterExplorer(Test) - verify evaluation patterns built using iterators Copyright (C) Lumiera.org 2012, Hermann Vosseler This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the License, or (at your option) any later version. This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the GNU General Public License for more details. You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License along with this program; if not, write to the Free Software Foundation, Inc., 675 Mass Ave, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA. * *****************************************************/ #include "lib/test/run.hpp" #include "lib/test/test-helper.hpp" #include "lib/iter-adapter-stl.hpp" #include "lib/util.hpp" #include "lib/iter-explorer.hpp" #include #include #include #include #include #include "lib/meta/trait.hpp" namespace lib { namespace test{ using ::Test; using util::isnil; using util::isSameObject; using std::cout; using std::endl; using std::string; using lib::iter_stl::eachElm; using lib::iter_explorer::ChainedIters; using lumiera::error::LUMIERA_ERROR_ITER_EXHAUST; namespace { // test substrate: simple number sequence iterator /** * This iteration "state core" type describes * a sequence of numbers yet to be delivered. */ class State { uint p,e; public: State(uint start, uint end) : p(start) , e(end) { } friend bool checkPoint (State const& st) { return st.p < st.e; } friend uint& yield (State const& st) { return util::unConst(checkPoint(st)? st.p : st.e); } friend void iterNext (State & st) { if (!checkPoint(st)) return; ++st.p; } }; /** * A straight ascending number sequence as basic test iterator. * The tests will dress up this source sequence in various ways. */ class NumberSequence : public IterStateWrapper { public: explicit NumberSequence(uint end = 0) : IterStateWrapper (State(0,end)) { } NumberSequence(uint start, uint end) : IterStateWrapper (State(start,end)) { } /** allow using NumberSequence in LinkedElements * (intrusive single linked list) */ NumberSequence* next; }; inline NumberSequence seq (uint end) { return NumberSequence(end); } inline NumberSequence seq (uint start, uint end) { return NumberSequence(start, end); } NumberSequence NIL_Sequence; /** * an arbitrary series of numbers * @note deliberately this is another type * and not equivalent to a NumberSequence, * while both do share the same value type */ typedef IterQueue NumberSeries; /** "exploration function" to generate a functional datastructure. * Divide the given number by 5, 3 and 2, if possible. Repeatedly * applying this function yields a tree of decimation sequences, * each leading down to 1 */ inline NumberSeries exploreChildren (uint node) { NumberSeries results; if (0 == node % 5 && node/5 > 0) results.feed (node/5); if (0 == node % 3 && node/3 > 0) results.feed (node/3); if (0 == node % 2 && node/2 > 0) results.feed (node/2); return results; } /** Diagnostic helper: "squeeze out" the given iterator * and join all the elements yielded into a string */ template inline string materialise (II ii) { std::ostringstream buff; while (ii) { buff << *ii; if (++ii) buff << "-"; } return buff.str(); } template inline void pullOut (II & ii) { while (ii) { cout << *ii; if (++ii) cout << "-"; } cout << endl; } } // (END) test helpers /********************************************************************* * @test use a simple source iterator yielding numbers * to build various functional evaluation structures, * based on the IterExplorer template. * * \par Explanation * Both this test and the IterExplorer template might be bewildering * and cryptic, unless you know the Monad design pattern. Monads are * heavily used in functional programming, actually they originate * from Category Theory. Basically, Monad is a pattern where we * combine several computation steps in a specific way; but instead * of intermingling the individual computation steps and their * combination, the goal is to separate and isolate the mechanics * of combination, so we can focus on the actual computation steps: * The mechanics of combination are embedded into the Monad type, * which acts as a kind of container, holding some entities * to be processed. The actual processing steps are then * fed to the monad as "function object" parameters. * * Using the monad pattern is well suited when both the mechanics of * combination and the individual computation steps tend to be complex. * In such a situation, it is beneficial to develop and test both * in isolation. The IterExplorer template applies this pattern * to the task of processing a source sequence. Typically we use * this in situations where we can't effort building elaborate * data structures in (global) memory, but rather strive at * doing everything on-the-fly. A typical example is the * processing of a variably sized data set without * using heap memory for intermediary results. * * @see IterExplorer * @see IterAdapter */ class IterExplorer_test : public Test { virtual void run (Arg) { verifyStateAdapter(); verifyMonadOperator (); verifyChainedIterators(); verifyRawChainedIterators(); verifyDepthFirstExploration(); verifyBreadthFirstExploration(); verifyRecursiveSelfIntegration(); } /** @test all of the following IterExplorer flavours are built on top * of a special iterator adapter, centred at the notion of an iterable * state element type. The actual iterator just embodies one element * of this state representation, and typically there is not an hidden * back-link to some kind of container in charge of the elements yielded */ void verifyStateAdapter () { NumberSequence ii = seq(9); CHECK (!isnil (ii)); CHECK (0 == *ii); ++ii; CHECK (1 == *ii); pullOut(ii); CHECK ( isnil (ii)); CHECK (!ii); VERIFY_ERROR (ITER_EXHAUST, *ii ); VERIFY_ERROR (ITER_EXHAUST, ++ii ); ii = seq(5); CHECK (materialise(ii) == "0-1-2-3-4"); ii = seq(5,8); CHECK (materialise(ii) == "5-6-7"); ii = NIL_Sequence; CHECK ( isnil (ii)); CHECK (!ii); } /** @test a convenient helper built using IterExplorer building blocks. * The resulting iterator \em combines and \em flattens a sequence * of source iterators, resulting in a simple sequence accessible * as iterator again. Here we verify the convenience / default * implementation; it uses a STL container (actually std:deque) * behind the scenes to keep track of all added source iterators. */ void verifyChainedIterators () { typedef ChainedIters Chain; Chain ci = iterChain (seq(5),seq(7),seq(9)); CHECK (!isnil (ci)); pullOut (ci); CHECK ( isnil (ci)); VERIFY_ERROR (ITER_EXHAUST, *ci ); VERIFY_ERROR (ITER_EXHAUST, ++ci ); CHECK (isnil(Chain())); CHECK (!iterChain (NIL_Sequence)); // Iterator chaining "flattens" one level of packaging NumberSequence s9 = seq(9); ci = iterChain (s9); for ( ; s9 && ci; ++s9, ++ci ) CHECK (*s9 == *ci); CHECK (isnil(s9)); CHECK (isnil(ci)); // Note: Iterator chain is created based on (shallow) copy // of the source sequences. In case these have an independent // per-instance state (like e.g. NumberSequence used for this test), // then the created chain is independent from the source iterators. s9 = seq(9); ci = iterChain (s9); CHECK (0 == *s9); CHECK (0 == *ci); pullOut (ci); CHECK (isnil(ci)); CHECK (0 == *s9); pullOut (s9); CHECK (isnil(s9)); } /** @test variation of the iterator chaining facility. * This is the "raw" version without any convenience shortcuts. * The source iterators are given as iterator yielding other iterators. */ void verifyRawChainedIterators () { typedef std::vector IterContainer; typedef RangeIter IterIter; typedef ChainedIters Chain; NumberSequence s5 (1,5); NumberSequence s7 (5,8); NumberSequence s9 (8,10); CHECK (1 == *s5); CHECK (5 == *s7); CHECK (8 == *s9); IterContainer srcIters; srcIters.push_back (s5); srcIters.push_back (s7); srcIters.push_back (s9); IterIter iti = eachElm(srcIters); CHECK (!isnil (iti)); // note: iterator has been copied CHECK ( isSameObject (srcIters[0], *iti)); CHECK (!isSameObject (s5, *iti)); Chain chain(iti); CHECK (!isnil (iti)); CHECK (1 == *chain); ++chain; CHECK (2 == *chain); CHECK (1 == *s5); // unaffected of course... CHECK (5 == *s7); CHECK (8 == *s9); ++++chain; CHECK (4 == *chain); ++chain; CHECK (5 == *chain); // switch over to contents of 2nd iterator ++++++++chain; CHECK (9 == *chain); ++chain; CHECK (isnil(chain)); VERIFY_ERROR (ITER_EXHAUST, *chain ); VERIFY_ERROR (ITER_EXHAUST, ++chain ); } /** @test a depth-first visiting and exploration scheme * of a tree like system, built on top of the IterExplorer monad. * * \par Test data structure * We build a functional datastructure here, on the fly, while exploring it. * The \c exploreChildren(m) function generates this tree like datastructure: * For a given number, it tries to divide by 5, 3 and 2 respectively, possibly * generating multiple decimation sequences. * * If we start such a tree structure e.g. with a root node 30, this scheme yields: * \code * ( 30 ) * ( 6 10 15 ) * ( 2 3 2 5 3 5 ) * ( 1 1 1 1 1 1 ) * \endcode * This tree has no meaning in itself, beyond being an easy testbed for tree exploration schemes. * * \par How the exploration works * We use a pre defined Template \link DepthFirstExplorer \endlink, which is built on top of IterExplorer. * It contains the depth-first exploration strategy in a hardwired fashion. Actually this effect is achieved * by defining a specific way how to \em combine the results of an \em exploration -- the latter being the * function which generates the data structure. To yield a depth-first exploration, all we have to do * is to delve down immediately into the children, right after visiting the node itself. * * Now, when creating such a DepthFirstExplorer by wrapping a given source iterator, the result is again * an iterator, but a specific iterator which at the same time is a Monad: It supports the \c >>= operation * (also known as \em bind operator or \em flatMap operator). This operator takes as second argument a * function, which in our case is the function to generate or explore the data structure. * * The result of applying this \c >>= operation is a \em transformed version of the source iterator, * i.e. it is again an iterator, which yields the results of the exploration function, combined together * in the order as defined by the built-in exploration strategy (here: depth first) * * @note technical detail: the result type of the exploration function (here \c exploreChildren() ) determines * the iterator type used within IterExplorer and to drive the evaluation. The source sequence used to * seed the evaluation process actually can be any iterator yielding assignment compatible values: The * second example uses a NumberSequence with unsigned int values 0..6, while the actual expansion and * evaluation is based on NumberSeries using signed int values. */ void verifyDepthFirstExploration () { NumberSeries root = elements(30); string explorationResult = materialise (depthFirst(root) >>= exploreChildren); CHECK (explorationResult == "30-6-2-1-3-1-10-2-1-5-1-15-3-1-5-1"); NumberSequence to7 = seq(7); explorationResult = materialise (depthFirst(to7) >>= exploreChildren); CHECK (explorationResult == "0-1-2-1-3-1-4-2-1-5-1-6-2-1-3-1"); } /** @test a breadth-first visiting and exploration scheme * of a tree like system, built on top of the IterExplorer monad; * here, an internal queue is used to explore the hierarchy in layers. * The (functional) datastructure is the same, just we're visiting it * differently here (in rows or layers). */ void verifyBreadthFirstExploration () { NumberSeries root = elements(30); string explorationResult = materialise (breadthFirst(root) >>= exploreChildren); CHECK (explorationResult == "30-6-10-15-2-3-2-5-3-5-1-1-1-1-1-1"); } /** @test a variation of recursive exploration, this time directly * relying on the result set iterator type to provide the re-integration * of intermediary results. Since our \c exploreChildren() function returns * a NumberSeries, which basically is a IterQueue, the re-integration of expanded * elements will happen at the end, resulting in breadth-first visitation order -- * but contrary to the dedicated \c breadthFirst(..) explorer, this expansion is done * separately for each element in the initial seed sequence. Note for example how the * expansion series for number 30, which is also generated in * \link #verifyBreadthFirstExploration \endlink, appears here at the end of the * explorationResult sequence * @remarks this "combinator strategy" is really intended for use with custom sequences, * where the "Explorer" function works together with a specific implementation. * Actually this is what we use in the proc::engine::Dispatcher to generate a * series of frame render jobs, including all prerequisite jobs */ void verifyRecursiveSelfIntegration () { typedef IterExplorer ,iter_explorer::RecursiveSelfIntegration> SelfIntegratingExploration; NumberSeries root = elements(10,20,30); SelfIntegratingExploration exploration(root); string explorationResult = materialise (exploration >>= exploreChildren); CHECK (explorationResult == "10-2-5-1-1-20-4-10-2-2-5-1-1-1-30-6-10-15-2-3-2-5-3-5-1-1-1-1-1-1"); } /** @test cover the basic monad bind operator, * which is used to build all the specialised Iterator flavours. * The default implementation ("Combinator strategy") just joins and flattens * the result sequences created by the functor bound into the monad. For this test, * we use a functor \c explode(top), which returns the sequence 0...top. */ void verifyMonadOperator () { // IterExplorer as such is an iterator wrapping the source sequence string result = materialise (exploreIter(seq(5))); CHECK (result == "0-1-2-3-4"); // now, if the source sequence yields exactly one element 5... result = materialise (exploreIter(seq(5,6))); CHECK (result == "5"); // then binding the explode()-Function yields just the result of invoking explode(5) result = materialise (exploreIter(seq(5,6)) >>= explode); CHECK (result == "0-1-2-3-4"); // binding anything into an empty sequence still results in an empty sequence result = materialise (exploreIter(seq(0)) >>= explode); CHECK (result == ""); // also, n case the bound function yields an empty sequence, the result remains empty result = materialise (exploreIter(seq(1)) >>= explode); CHECK (result == ""); // combining an empty sequence and the one element sequence (seq(0,1)) results in just one element result = materialise (exploreIter(seq(2)) >>= explode); CHECK (result == "0"); // multiple result sequences will be joined (flattened) into one sequence result = materialise (exploreIter(seq(5)) >>= explode); CHECK (result == "0-0-1-0-1-2-0-1-2-3"); // since the result is a monad, we can again bind yet another function result = materialise((exploreIter(seq(5)) >>= explode) >>= explode); CHECK (result == "0-0-0-1-0-0-1-0-1-2"); // Explanation: // 0 -> empty sequence, gets dropped // 1 -> 1-element sequence {0} // 2 -> {0,1} // 3 -> {0,1,2} // Note: when cascading multiple >>= the parentheses are necessary, since in C++ unfortunately // the ">>=" associates to the right, while the proper monad bind operator should associate to the left } static NumberSequence explode (uint top) { return seq(0,top); } }; LAUNCHER (IterExplorer_test, "unit common"); }} // namespace lib::test