LUMIERA.clone/tests/vault/gear/special-job-fun-test.cpp
Ichthyostega 806db414dd Copyright: clarify and simplify the file headers
* Lumiera source code always was copyrighted by individual contributors
 * there is no entity "Lumiera.org" which holds any copyrights
 * Lumiera source code is provided under the GPL Version 2+

== Explanations ==
Lumiera as a whole is distributed under Copyleft, GNU General Public License Version 2 or above.
For this to become legally effective, the ''File COPYING in the root directory is sufficient.''

The licensing header in each file is not strictly necessary, yet considered good practice;
attaching a licence notice increases the likeliness that this information is retained
in case someone extracts individual code files. However, it is not by the presence of some
text, that legally binding licensing terms become effective; rather the fact matters that a
given piece of code was provably copyrighted and published under a license. Even reformatting
the code, renaming some variables or deleting parts of the code will not alter this legal
situation, but rather creates a derivative work, which is likewise covered by the GPL!

The most relevant information in the file header is the notice regarding the
time of the first individual copyright claim. By virtue of this initial copyright,
the first author is entitled to choose the terms of licensing. All further
modifications are permitted and covered by the License. The specific wording
or format of the copyright header is not legally relevant, as long as the
intention to publish under the GPL remains clear. The extended wording was
based on a recommendation by the FSF. It can be shortened, because the full terms
of the license are provided alongside the distribution, in the file COPYING.
2024-11-17 23:42:55 +01:00

182 lines
7.3 KiB
C++
Raw Permalink Blame History

This file contains invisible Unicode characters

This file contains invisible Unicode characters that are indistinguishable to humans but may be processed differently by a computer. If you think that this is intentional, you can safely ignore this warning. Use the Escape button to reveal them.

/*
SpecialJobFun(Test) - verify a disposable configurable job functor
Copyright (C)
2023, Hermann Vosseler <Ichthyostega@web.de>
  **Lumiera** is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify it
  under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by the
  Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the License, or (at your
  option) any later version. See the file COPYING for further details.
* *****************************************************************/
/** @file special-job-fun-test.cpp
** unit test \ref SpecialJobFun_test
*/
#include "lib/test/run.hpp"
#include "lib/test/test-helper.hpp"
//#include "vault/real-clock.hpp"
//#include "lib/time/timevalue.hpp"
#include "vault/gear/special-job-fun.hpp"
#include "lib/format-cout.hpp" ////////////////////////////////////TODO Moo-oh
#include "lib/test/diagnostic-output.hpp"//////////////////////////TODO TOD-oh
#include "lib/test/tracking-dummy.hpp"
//#include "lib/util.hpp"
//#include <array>
//#include <functional>
//using lib::time::Time;
//using lib::time::FSecs;
//using util::isnil;
//using util::isSameObject;
//using lib::test::randStr;
//using lib::test::randTime;
using lib::test::Dummy;
//using std::array;
namespace vault{
namespace gear {
namespace test {
namespace { // shorthands and parameters for test...
}//(End)test definitions
/*****************************************************************//**
* @test verify a self-managing one-time render job functor.
* @see TestChainLoad_test::usageExample
* @see TestChainLoad::ScheduleCtx::continuation()
* @see special-job-fun.hpp
*/
class SpecialJobFun_test : public Test
{
virtual void
run (Arg)
{
simpleUsage();
verifyLifecycle();
}
/** @test demonstrate simple usage by λ-binding
* @todo WIP 12/23 🔁 define ⟶ ✔ implement
*/
void
simpleUsage()
{
bool hit{false}; // create directly from λ
SpecialJobFun specialFun{[&](JobParameter){ hit=true; }};
CHECK (specialFun);
Job funJob{specialFun
,InvocationInstanceID()
,Time::ANYTIME
};
funJob.triggerJob();
CHECK (hit);
CHECK (not specialFun);
}
/** @test verify storage and lifecycle management
* - use a instance-tracking marker implanted into the functor
* - verify no memory is leaked and the tracker instance is deallocated
* - verify the single tracker instance indeed lives in the JobFunctor
* - investigate the usage count of the front-end handle
* - verify the front-end can be copied without impact on the JobFunctor
* - verify the heap allocated functor keeps itself alive
* even when the front-end handle is already gone.
* - verify the functor de-allocates itself after latst invocation
* @todo WIP 12/23 ✔ define ⟶ ✔ implement
*/
void
verifyLifecycle()
{
CHECK (0 == Dummy::checksum());
{ // Note: ▽▽▽ tracker in λ-closure
SpecialJobFun funTrack{[tracker=Dummy(23)]
(JobParameter param) mutable
{
int mark = param.invoKey.part.a;
tracker.setVal (mark);
}}; // △△△ invocation should alter checksum
// one Dummy instance was implanted
CHECK (23 == Dummy::checksum());
InvocationInstanceID hiddenMessage;
hiddenMessage.part.a = 55;
Job funJob{funTrack
,hiddenMessage
,Time::ANYTIME
};
CHECK (23 == Dummy::checksum());
funJob.triggerJob();
CHECK (55 == Dummy::checksum()); // the `funJob` front-end handle still keeps it alive
} // but when this front-end goes out of scope...
CHECK (0 == Dummy::checksum()); // the implanted tracker is also gone
{ // another investigation with the same technique...
auto trackingLambda = [tracker=Dummy(23)]
(JobParameter param) mutable
{
int mark = param.invoKey.part.a;
tracker.setVal (mark);
};
CHECK (23 == Dummy::checksum());
SpecialJobFun frontEnd{move(trackingLambda)}; // this time the λ is moved in..
CHECK (23 == Dummy::checksum()); // the embedded tracker was copied into the Functor in heap memory
CHECK (2 == frontEnd.use_count()); // Note: both the front-end and the Functor in heap hold a use-reference
auto otherHandle = frontEnd; // copy of front-end...
CHECK (3 == frontEnd.use_count()); // ...so there are three usages of the front-end handle now
CHECK (23 == Dummy::checksum()); // ...but only one tracker instance (in heap)
frontEnd = SpecialJobFun(); // re-assign one front-end handle with an empty instance
CHECK (0 == frontEnd.use_count()); // thus `frontEnd` is no longer attached to the active instance
CHECK (2 == otherHandle.use_count()); // but the other copy still is
CHECK (not frontEnd);
CHECK (otherHandle);
InvocationInstanceID hiddenMessage;
hiddenMessage.part.a = 55;
Job funJob{otherHandle // Note: don't pass the handle here, rather a JobFunctor& is extracted
,hiddenMessage
,Time::ANYTIME
};
CHECK (2 == otherHandle.use_count());
CHECK (23 == Dummy::checksum());
otherHandle = SpecialJobFun(); // now kill even the last front-end handle we had
CHECK (0 == otherHandle.use_count()); // thus _we_ have no way to reach the Functor in heap
CHECK (23 == Dummy::checksum()); // yet it stays alive, since it was not invoked yet
funJob.triggerJob(); // after invocation, the Functor in heap memory self-destructs
CHECK (0 == Dummy::checksum()); // since it did hold the last reference
}
CHECK (0 == Dummy::checksum());
}
};
/** Register this test class... */
LAUNCHER (SpecialJobFun_test, "unit engine");
}}} // namespace vault::gear::test