LUMIERA.clone/tests/core/proc/mobject/session/rebuildfixturetest.cpp
Ichthyostega 24b3bec4be Doxygen: prepare all unit tests for inclusion in the documentation
Doxygen will only process files with a @file documentation comment.
Up to now, none of our test code has such a comment, preventing the
cross-links to unit tests from working.

This is unfortunate, since unit tests, and even the code comments there,
can be considered as the most useful form of technical documentation.
Thus I'll start an initiative to fill in those missing comments automatically
2017-02-22 01:54:20 +01:00

91 lines
3 KiB
C++

/*
RebuildFixture(Test) - (re)building the explicit placements
Copyright (C) Lumiera.org
2008, Hermann Vosseler <Ichthyostega@web.de>
This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or
modify it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as
published by the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of
the License, or (at your option) any later version.
This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the
GNU General Public License for more details.
You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
along with this program; if not, write to the Free Software
Foundation, Inc., 675 Mass Ave, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA.
* *****************************************************/
/** @file rebuildfixturetest.cpp
** unit test §§TODO§§
*/
#include "lib/test/run.hpp"
#include "proc/mobject/session.hpp"
#include "proc/mobject/session/testsession1.hpp"
//#include "lib/format-cout.hpp"
//#include "lib/util.hpp"
//using util::contains;
namespace proc {
namespace mobject {
namespace session {
namespace test {
/***************************************************************//**
* @test (re)building the ExplicitPlacement objects from the objects
* placed into the Session/Model.
* @see mobject::session::Fixture
* @see mobject::ExplicitPlacement
*/
class RebuildFixture_test : public Test
{
virtual void
run (Arg arg)
{
PSess sess = Session::current;
sess.clear();
buildTestsession1();
CHECK (sess->isValid());
sess->rebuildFixture();
#if false ////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////TICKET #548
TODO ("check the fixture has been touched. e.g. by hash.");
TODO ("query all Placements of all Clips (via AssetManager). Verify explicit plac contained in Fixture.");
UNIMPLEMENTED ("iterate over fixture");
// TODO
// for_each (sess->getFixture(),
// bind (&check_is_from_EDL, _1, sess.getEDL()));
TODO ("can we check the other direction, from EDL to Fixture??");
}
static void
check_is_from_EDL (PMO explicitPlacement, EDL& edl)
{
////TODO do we still support this? can it be replaced by a directly checking predicate on ExplicitPlacement??
// PMO originalPlacement = explicitPlacement->subject->getPlacement();
// CHECK (edl.contains(originalPlacement));
#endif ///////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////TICKET #548
}
};
/** Register this test class... */
LAUNCHER (RebuildFixture_test, "unit session");
}}}} // namespace proc::mobject::session::test