Doxygen will only process files with a @file documentation comment. Up to now, none of our test code has such a comment, preventing the cross-links to unit tests from working. This is unfortunate, since unit tests, and even the code comments there, can be considered as the most useful form of technical documentation. Thus I'll start an initiative to fill in those missing comments automatically
91 lines
3 KiB
C++
91 lines
3 KiB
C++
/*
|
|
RebuildFixture(Test) - (re)building the explicit placements
|
|
|
|
Copyright (C) Lumiera.org
|
|
2008, Hermann Vosseler <Ichthyostega@web.de>
|
|
|
|
This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or
|
|
modify it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as
|
|
published by the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of
|
|
the License, or (at your option) any later version.
|
|
|
|
This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
|
|
but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
|
|
MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the
|
|
GNU General Public License for more details.
|
|
|
|
You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
|
|
along with this program; if not, write to the Free Software
|
|
Foundation, Inc., 675 Mass Ave, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA.
|
|
|
|
* *****************************************************/
|
|
|
|
/** @file rebuildfixturetest.cpp
|
|
** unit test §§TODO§§
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
|
|
#include "lib/test/run.hpp"
|
|
#include "proc/mobject/session.hpp"
|
|
#include "proc/mobject/session/testsession1.hpp"
|
|
//#include "lib/format-cout.hpp"
|
|
//#include "lib/util.hpp"
|
|
|
|
//using util::contains;
|
|
|
|
|
|
namespace proc {
|
|
namespace mobject {
|
|
namespace session {
|
|
namespace test {
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/***************************************************************//**
|
|
* @test (re)building the ExplicitPlacement objects from the objects
|
|
* placed into the Session/Model.
|
|
* @see mobject::session::Fixture
|
|
* @see mobject::ExplicitPlacement
|
|
*/
|
|
class RebuildFixture_test : public Test
|
|
{
|
|
virtual void
|
|
run (Arg arg)
|
|
{
|
|
PSess sess = Session::current;
|
|
sess.clear();
|
|
buildTestsession1();
|
|
CHECK (sess->isValid());
|
|
sess->rebuildFixture();
|
|
#if false ////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////TICKET #548
|
|
TODO ("check the fixture has been touched. e.g. by hash.");
|
|
TODO ("query all Placements of all Clips (via AssetManager). Verify explicit plac contained in Fixture.");
|
|
|
|
UNIMPLEMENTED ("iterate over fixture");
|
|
// TODO
|
|
// for_each (sess->getFixture(),
|
|
// bind (&check_is_from_EDL, _1, sess.getEDL()));
|
|
|
|
TODO ("can we check the other direction, from EDL to Fixture??");
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
static void
|
|
check_is_from_EDL (PMO explicitPlacement, EDL& edl)
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
////TODO do we still support this? can it be replaced by a directly checking predicate on ExplicitPlacement??
|
|
|
|
// PMO originalPlacement = explicitPlacement->subject->getPlacement();
|
|
// CHECK (edl.contains(originalPlacement));
|
|
#endif ///////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////TICKET #548
|
|
}
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
|
|
/** Register this test class... */
|
|
LAUNCHER (RebuildFixture_test, "unit session");
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
}}}} // namespace proc::mobject::session::test
|