LUMIERA.clone/research
Ichthyostega 261049e04d DI: minimalistic design for service access
Problems:
 - using Meyers Singleton plus a ClassLock;
   This is wasteful, since the compiler will emit additional synchronisation
   and will likely not be able to detect the presence of our explicit locking guard

 - what happens if the Meyers Singleton can not even be instantiated, e.g. for
   an abstract baseclass? We are required to install an explicit subclass configuration
   in that case, but the compiler is not able to see this will happen, when just
   compiling the lib::Depend
2018-03-17 03:36:58 +01:00
..
clang-static-init-1.cpp BUG: Clang shows a problem when accessing templated static variable through separate compilation units 2013-10-06 23:17:18 +02:00
clang-static-init-2.cpp bughunt: re-create the whole 2nd layer with a configurable product type --> HIT 2013-10-06 23:17:18 +02:00
clang-static-init.hpp BUG: Clang shows a problem when accessing templated static variable through separate compilation units 2013-10-06 23:17:18 +02:00
crash_gdb_jessie-2015-08.sh investigation: Segfault in GDB (IV) (related to #946) 2015-08-16 01:17:35 +02:00
DIR_INFO SCons: new build target for experimental code 2011-12-03 06:10:12 +01:00
SConscript experiment: now bind a Proc-Layer command to these fabricated functions 2016-01-15 23:55:44 +01:00
try.cpp DI: minimalistic design for service access 2018-03-17 03:36:58 +01:00