Ichthyostega
3a3b7e4dd7
This is one remaining tricky detail to be solved. The underlying difficulty is architectural: - the processing functor will be supplied by the Media-Lib-Plug-in - while a functor to set parameters and automation will be added from another context Yet both have to work together, and both together will determine the effective type of the ''Weaving Pattern'' Thus we'll have to get both functors somehow integrated into the Level-2-Builder, yet we must be able first to pass this builder instance to the Library-Plug-in and then, in a second step, another part of the Lumiera Builder logic will have to add the Parameter wiring. The solution I'm proposing is to exploit the observation that in fact the processing functor is stored as a kind of »Prototype« within the ''Weaving Pattern'' and will be ''copied'' from there for each individual Render Node invocation. The reasons for this is, we want the optimiser to see the full instantiation of the library function and thus get maximum leverage; thus the code doing the actual call must see the functor or lambda to be able to inline it. This leads to the idea to ''separate'' this »prototype« from the `FeedManifold`; the latter thereby becomes mostly agnostic of parameter processing. However, `FeedManifold` must then accept a copy of the parameter values as constructor argument and pass it into its internal storage. This forces yet another reorganisation of the class structure. Basically the storage modules for `FeedManifold` are now prepared within a configuratiton class, which actually helps to simplify the metaprogramming definitions and keeps the enclosing namespace clean. |
||
|---|---|---|
| .. | ||
| draw | ||
| DIR_INFO | ||
| dump | ||
| empty.html | ||
| InterfaceConcept_Varga.mm | ||
| renderengine.html | ||
| thinkPad.ichthyo.mm | ||
| uml | ||
| workflow.mm | ||