Relying on random numbers for verification and measurements is known to be problematic. At some point we are bound to control the seed values -- and in the actual application usage we want to record sequence seeding in the event log. Some initial thoughts regarding this intricate topic. * a low-ceremony drop-in replacement for rand() is required * we want the ability to pick-up and control each and every usage eventually * however, some usages explicitly require true randomness * the ability to use separate streams of random-number generation is desirable
17 lines
291 B
Text
17 lines
291 B
Text
TESTING "Library Test Suite: calculation" ./test-suite --group=calculation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PLANNED "Data Table with CSV storage" DataCSV_test <<END
|
|
return: 0
|
|
END
|
|
|
|
|
|
PLANNED "Statistic and Regression" Statistic_test << END
|
|
return: 0
|
|
END
|
|
|
|
|
|
PLANNED "Random numbers and Seed" Random_test << END
|
|
return: 0
|
|
END
|