LUMIERA.clone/tests/core/steam/mobject/session/rebuildfixturetest.cpp

83 lines
2.6 KiB
C++
Raw Normal View History

2007-09-03 02:33:47 +02:00
/*
RebuildFixture(Test) - (re)building the explicit placements
2010-12-17 23:28:49 +01:00
Copyright: clarify and simplify the file headers * Lumiera source code always was copyrighted by individual contributors * there is no entity "Lumiera.org" which holds any copyrights * Lumiera source code is provided under the GPL Version 2+ == Explanations == Lumiera as a whole is distributed under Copyleft, GNU General Public License Version 2 or above. For this to become legally effective, the ''File COPYING in the root directory is sufficient.'' The licensing header in each file is not strictly necessary, yet considered good practice; attaching a licence notice increases the likeliness that this information is retained in case someone extracts individual code files. However, it is not by the presence of some text, that legally binding licensing terms become effective; rather the fact matters that a given piece of code was provably copyrighted and published under a license. Even reformatting the code, renaming some variables or deleting parts of the code will not alter this legal situation, but rather creates a derivative work, which is likewise covered by the GPL! The most relevant information in the file header is the notice regarding the time of the first individual copyright claim. By virtue of this initial copyright, the first author is entitled to choose the terms of licensing. All further modifications are permitted and covered by the License. The specific wording or format of the copyright header is not legally relevant, as long as the intention to publish under the GPL remains clear. The extended wording was based on a recommendation by the FSF. It can be shortened, because the full terms of the license are provided alongside the distribution, in the file COPYING.
2024-11-17 23:42:55 +01:00
Copyright (C)
2008, Hermann Vosseler <Ichthyostega@web.de>
2010-12-17 23:28:49 +01:00
Copyright: clarify and simplify the file headers * Lumiera source code always was copyrighted by individual contributors * there is no entity "Lumiera.org" which holds any copyrights * Lumiera source code is provided under the GPL Version 2+ == Explanations == Lumiera as a whole is distributed under Copyleft, GNU General Public License Version 2 or above. For this to become legally effective, the ''File COPYING in the root directory is sufficient.'' The licensing header in each file is not strictly necessary, yet considered good practice; attaching a licence notice increases the likeliness that this information is retained in case someone extracts individual code files. However, it is not by the presence of some text, that legally binding licensing terms become effective; rather the fact matters that a given piece of code was provably copyrighted and published under a license. Even reformatting the code, renaming some variables or deleting parts of the code will not alter this legal situation, but rather creates a derivative work, which is likewise covered by the GPL! The most relevant information in the file header is the notice regarding the time of the first individual copyright claim. By virtue of this initial copyright, the first author is entitled to choose the terms of licensing. All further modifications are permitted and covered by the License. The specific wording or format of the copyright header is not legally relevant, as long as the intention to publish under the GPL remains clear. The extended wording was based on a recommendation by the FSF. It can be shortened, because the full terms of the license are provided alongside the distribution, in the file COPYING.
2024-11-17 23:42:55 +01:00
  **Lumiera** is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify it
  under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by the
  Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the License, or (at your
  option) any later version. See the file COPYING for further details.
2010-12-17 23:28:49 +01:00
Copyright: clarify and simplify the file headers * Lumiera source code always was copyrighted by individual contributors * there is no entity "Lumiera.org" which holds any copyrights * Lumiera source code is provided under the GPL Version 2+ == Explanations == Lumiera as a whole is distributed under Copyleft, GNU General Public License Version 2 or above. For this to become legally effective, the ''File COPYING in the root directory is sufficient.'' The licensing header in each file is not strictly necessary, yet considered good practice; attaching a licence notice increases the likeliness that this information is retained in case someone extracts individual code files. However, it is not by the presence of some text, that legally binding licensing terms become effective; rather the fact matters that a given piece of code was provably copyrighted and published under a license. Even reformatting the code, renaming some variables or deleting parts of the code will not alter this legal situation, but rather creates a derivative work, which is likewise covered by the GPL! The most relevant information in the file header is the notice regarding the time of the first individual copyright claim. By virtue of this initial copyright, the first author is entitled to choose the terms of licensing. All further modifications are permitted and covered by the License. The specific wording or format of the copyright header is not legally relevant, as long as the intention to publish under the GPL remains clear. The extended wording was based on a recommendation by the FSF. It can be shortened, because the full terms of the license are provided alongside the distribution, in the file COPYING.
2024-11-17 23:42:55 +01:00
* *****************************************************************/
2007-09-03 02:33:47 +02:00
/** @file rebuildfixturetest.cpp
** unit test \ref RebuildFixture_test
*/
2007-09-03 02:33:47 +02:00
#include "lib/test/run.hpp"
#include "steam/mobject/session.hpp"
#include "steam/mobject/session/testsession1.hpp"
//#include "lib/format-cout.hpp"
//#include "lib/util.hpp"
2007-09-03 02:33:47 +02:00
//using util::contains;
2007-09-03 02:33:47 +02:00
namespace steam {
namespace mobject {
namespace session {
namespace test {
/***************************************************************//**
* @test (re)building the ExplicitPlacement objects from the objects
2010-02-22 03:52:52 +01:00
* placed into the Session/Model.
* @see mobject::session::Fixture
* @see mobject::ExplicitPlacement
*/
class RebuildFixture_test : public Test
2007-09-03 02:33:47 +02:00
{
virtual void
run (Arg arg)
2007-09-03 02:33:47 +02:00
{
PSess sess = Session::current;
sess.clear();
buildTestsession1();
CHECK (sess->isValid());
sess->rebuildFixture();
2010-02-22 03:52:52 +01:00
#if false ////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////TICKET #548
TODO ("check the fixture has been touched. e.g. by hash.");
TODO ("query all Placements of all Clips (via AssetManager). Verify explicit plac contained in Fixture.");
UNIMPLEMENTED ("iterate over fixture");
// TODO
// for_each (sess->getFixture(),
// bind (&check_is_from_EDL, _1, sess.getEDL()));
TODO ("can we check the other direction, from EDL to Fixture??");
}
2007-09-03 02:33:47 +02:00
static void
check_is_from_EDL (PMO explicitPlacement, EDL& edl)
{
////TODO do we still support this? can it be replaced by a directly checking predicate on ExplicitPlacement??
// PMO originalPlacement = explicitPlacement->subject->getPlacement();
// CHECK (edl.contains(originalPlacement));
2010-02-22 03:52:52 +01:00
#endif ///////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////TICKET #548
}
};
2007-09-03 02:33:47 +02:00
/** Register this test class... */
LAUNCHER (RebuildFixture_test, "unit session");
}}}} // namespace steam::mobject::session::test