ichthyo/LUMIERA.clone
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull requests Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity Actions

draft impl of Record<string>

Browse source 
this specialisation of the Record template is provided as
default implementation for simple unit tests
This commit is contained in:
Fischlurch 2015-07-15 04:16:22 +02:00
parent f565ae4639
commit 430107fcd8
2 changed files with 94 additions and 70 deletions
Show stats Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

71
src/lib/diff/record.hpp
View file

@ -538,53 +538,62 @@ namespace diff{
/* === Specialisations to define the handling of attributes === */
template<>
inline bool
Record<string>::isAttribute (string const& v)
{
return false; ////TODO
}
template<>
inline bool
Record<string>::isTypeID (string const& v)
{
return false; ////TODO
}
template<>
inline string
Record<string>::extractTypeID (string const& v)
{
return "todo"; ////TODO
}
template<>
inline string
Record<string>::buildTypeAttribute (string const& typeID)
{
return string(); ///TODO
}
template<>
inline string
Record<string>::extractKey (string const& v)
{
return "todo"; ////TODO
size_t pos = v.find('=');
if (string::npos == pos)
return "";
else
return v.substr(0,pos); //////////////////////////////TODO should trim here
}
template<>
inline string
Record<string>::extractVal (string const& v)
{
return string(); ///TODO
size_t pos = v.find('=');
if (string::npos == pos)
return v;
else
return v.substr(pos+1, v.length() - pos); ////////////TODO should trim here
}
template<>
inline bool
Record<string>::isAttribute (string const& v)
{
return string::npos != v.find('=');
}
template<>
inline bool
Record<string>::isTypeID (string const& v)
{
return isAttribute(v)
&& "type" == extractKey(v);
}
template<>
inline string
Record<string>::extractTypeID (string const& v)
{
return "todo"; //////////////////////////////////////////TODO do we really need this function?
}
template<>
inline string
Record<string>::buildTypeAttribute (string const& typeID)
{
return "type = "+typeID;
}
template<>
inline string
Record<string>::renderAttribute (string const& attrib)
{
return extractKey(attrib) + " = " + string(extractVal(attrib));
return extractKey(attrib) + " = " + extractVal(attrib);
}

93
wiki/thinkPad.ichthyo.mm
View file

@ -69,8 +69,7 @@
eine Referenz oder einen konstanten Wert verwenden
</p>
</body>
</html>
</richcontent>
</html></richcontent>
<icon BUILTIN="yes"/>
<node CREATED="1435943194398" ID="ID_587131941" MODIFIED="1435943203161" TEXT="GenNode gibt Referenz auf Wert"/>
<node CREATED="1435943203662" ID="ID_1772960325" MODIFIED="1435943274743" TEXT="const GenNode gibt const&amp;">
@ -89,8 +88,7 @@
aber hat eine Builder-Mechanik
</p>
</body>
</html>
</richcontent>
</html></richcontent>
</node>
</node>
</node>
@ -104,8 +102,7 @@
eigentlich fehlte nur die get()-Operation
</p>
</body>
</html>
</richcontent>
</html></richcontent>
<icon BUILTIN="button_ok"/>
</node>
</node>
@ -125,8 +122,7 @@
aber nicht wirklich; der workaround k&#246;nnte schon die L&#246;sung sein #963
</p>
</body>
</html>
</richcontent>
</html></richcontent>
<icon BUILTIN="messagebox_warning"/>
<icon BUILTIN="button_ok"/>
<node CREATED="1435932667701" HGAP="22" ID="ID_1069242347" MODIFIED="1435932709198" TEXT="Copy matcht generischen ctor" VSHIFT="-9">
@ -148,8 +144,7 @@
Und ich wollte keine Zeit auf einen exzessiven Unit-Test verwenden
</p>
</body>
</html>
</richcontent>
</html></richcontent>
</node>
<node CREATED="1435942764328" ID="ID_1740355148" MODIFIED="1435942879414">
<richcontent TYPE="NODE"><html>
@ -161,8 +156,7 @@
generische L&#246;sung verschoben <font color="#990033">#963</font>
</p>
</body>
</html>
</richcontent>
</html></richcontent>
<arrowlink COLOR="#ff3333" DESTINATION="ID_1935900779" ENDARROW="Default" ENDINCLINATION="188;0;" ID="Arrow_ID_1626382520" STARTARROW="Default" STARTINCLINATION="2;73;"/>
<icon BUILTIN="button_cancel"/>
</node>
@ -176,8 +170,7 @@
C++11 erlaubt <b>=default</b>
</p>
</body>
</html>
</richcontent>
</html></richcontent>
<icon BUILTIN="idea"/>
</node>
</node>
@ -223,8 +216,7 @@
Object <b>builder</b>
</p>
</body>
</html>
</richcontent>
</html></richcontent>
<node CREATED="1435973448902" ID="ID_1729239555" MODIFIED="1435973564507" TEXT="wie definieren">
<richcontent TYPE="NOTE"><html>
<head>
@ -241,8 +233,7 @@
Und die Builder-Funktionen brauchen eigentlich spezielles Wissen &#252;ber den zu konstruierenden Zieltyp
</p>
</body>
</html>
</richcontent>
</html></richcontent>
<icon BUILTIN="help"/>
<node CREATED="1436042433806" ID="ID_601307933" MODIFIED="1436042451130" TEXT="Erweiterungspunkt"/>
<node CREATED="1436042451694" ID="ID_1270184731" MODIFIED="1436042458786" TEXT="durch explizite Spezialiserung"/>
@ -257,8 +248,7 @@
Mutator selber is <i>noncopyable</i>
</p>
</body>
</html>
</richcontent>
</html></richcontent>
</node>
</node>
<node CREATED="1435973566277" ID="ID_1320441333" MODIFIED="1435973686783">
@ -274,8 +264,7 @@
<font size="1">pro / contra</font>
</p>
</body>
</html>
</richcontent>
</html></richcontent>
<richcontent TYPE="NOTE"><html>
<head>
@ -294,8 +283,7 @@
Nicht sicher, ob der Optimiser das hinbekommt
</p>
</body>
</html>
</richcontent>
</html></richcontent>
<node CREATED="1436042507254" ID="ID_1832904297" MODIFIED="1436042518877">
<richcontent TYPE="NODE"><html>
<head>
@ -306,8 +294,7 @@
<i>nur</i>&#160;auf dem Mutator
</p>
</body>
</html>
</richcontent>
</html></richcontent>
</node>
<node CREATED="1436042520942" ID="ID_1700762999" MODIFIED="1436042539843">
<richcontent TYPE="NODE"><html>
@ -322,16 +309,49 @@
und mu&#223; dediziert erstellt werden
</p>
</body>
</html>
</richcontent>
</html></richcontent>
</node>
<node CREATED="1436042542502" ID="ID_890092502" MODIFIED="1436042552578" TEXT="move passiert immer explizit"/>
</node>
</node>
</node>
<node CREATED="1436042774669" ID="ID_714336641" MODIFIED="1436042778888" TEXT="Implementierung">
<node CREATED="1436042774669" ID="ID_714336641" MODIFIED="1436924649059" TEXT="Implementierung">
<icon BUILTIN="pencil"/>
<node CREATED="1436042783700" ID="ID_381817780" MODIFIED="1436042788584" TEXT="zwei Collections"/>
<node CREATED="1436042814044" ID="ID_1455779230" MODIFIED="1436042818312" TEXT="aber semantisch eine Liste"/>
<node CREATED="1436924462201" ID="ID_1369837914" MODIFIED="1436924596628" TEXT="Probleme">
<icon BUILTIN="flag-yellow"/>
<node CREATED="1436924502056" ID="ID_1085481788" MODIFIED="1436924641777" TEXT="R&#xfc;ckgabetyp von Attribut-Gettern">
<richcontent TYPE="NOTE"><html>
<head>
</head>
<body>
<p>
m&#246;glicherweise schon gel&#246;st,
</p>
<p>
denn Record ist insgesamt immutable.
</p>
<p>
Also k&#246;nnen wir einen Find mit einem const_iterator machen
</p>
</body>
</html>
</richcontent>
</node>
<node CREATED="1436924529208" ID="ID_1300693998" MODIFIED="1436924556572" TEXT="Handhabung des Typ-Feldes">
<node CREATED="1436925315589" ID="ID_327577903" MODIFIED="1436925320193" TEXT="herausfiltern">
<icon BUILTIN="help"/>
</node>
<node CREATED="1436924568352" ID="ID_1243616839" MODIFIED="1436924578280" TEXT="in Attribut-Iterator">
<icon BUILTIN="help"/>
</node>
<node CREATED="1436924578936" ID="ID_677097690" MODIFIED="1436924588615" TEXT="in Attribut-Collection ablegen">
<icon BUILTIN="help"/>
</node>
</node>
</node>
</node>
<node CREATED="1434128179406" HGAP="25" ID="ID_1833179523" MODIFIED="1436042759827" TEXT="Referez" VSHIFT="13">
<node CREATED="1434129158157" FOLDED="true" ID="ID_1777328498" MODIFIED="1436042674403" TEXT="sicher dereferenzierbar">
@ -352,8 +372,7 @@
scheidet aus, wegen Wertsemantik
</p>
</body>
</html>
</richcontent>
</html></richcontent>
<icon BUILTIN="button_cancel"/>
</node>
<node CREATED="1434129204149" ID="ID_1688475597" MODIFIED="1434236628128" TEXT="GenNode">
@ -403,8 +422,7 @@
hei&#223;t: in der Diff-Verarbeitung wird dieser spezielle check verwendet
</p>
</body>
</html>
</richcontent>
</html></richcontent>
<node CREATED="1434128740117" ID="ID_1537979881" MODIFIED="1434128764209" TEXT="spezielles Baumuster"/>
<node CREATED="1434128764893" ID="ID_1430586148" MODIFIED="1434128768689" TEXT="Gefahr von clashes"/>
<node CREATED="1434128769325" FOLDED="true" ID="ID_866845827" MODIFIED="1436042692523" TEXT="entscheide">
@ -425,8 +443,7 @@
m.E. die einzig saubere Desgin-Variante!
</p>
</body>
</html>
</richcontent>
</html></richcontent>
<icon BUILTIN="button_ok"/>
</node>
<node CREATED="1436021576224" FOLDED="true" ID="ID_1239136010" MODIFIED="1436042687348" TEXT="Begr&#xfc;ndung">
@ -456,8 +473,7 @@
</li>
</ul>
</body>
</html>
</richcontent>
</html></richcontent>
</node>
<node CREATED="1436021719055" ID="ID_1039111553" MODIFIED="1436021730099" TEXT="ist nur ein halber Nachteil"/>
<node CREATED="1436021731615" ID="ID_1576857183" MODIFIED="1436021741970" TEXT="kann n&#xe4;mlich auch Ausdrucksmittel sein"/>
@ -475,8 +491,7 @@
hei&#223;t: wird direkt von standard-equality so behandelt
</p>
</body>
</html>
</richcontent>
</html></richcontent>
<node CREATED="1434128685597" ID="ID_690649535" MODIFIED="1434128705631">
<richcontent TYPE="NODE"><html>
<head>