2fbb7ba7c9
simplification( #301 ): use ctor chaining to remove clutter
2016-02-06 16:42:42 +01:00
be2179ea81
command-closure-design( #301 ): better naming of implementation classes
...
Seems this was part of the confusion when looking at
the inheritance graph: Names where almost reversed
to the meaning. the ArgumentHolder was *not* the
argument holder, but the top level closure. And
the class "Closure" was not "the" Closure, but
just the argument holder. ;-)
2016-02-06 16:29:06 +01:00
334f542897
clean-up( #985 ): remove code superseded by this rework
...
now finally able to remove most of the cruft from format-util.hpp
and get rid of the infamous util::str
2016-01-09 02:05:23 +01:00
7fcee74960
formatting helper to join a collection into a string
...
Ouch!
Why does C++ lack the most basic everyday stuff?
It needn't be performant. It needn't support some fancy
higher order container. Just join the f***ing strings.
use Bosst?? -- OMG!! pulls in half the metra programming library
and tries to work on any concievable range like object. Just
somehow our Lumiera Forward Iterators aren't "range-like" enough
for boost's taste.
Thus let's code up that fucking for-loop ourselves, once and forever.
2015-08-16 01:35:28 +02:00
7be1b7d35d
Switch from TR1 preveiw to the new standard headers
...
- functional
- memory
- unordered collections
2014-04-03 22:42:48 +02:00
50885a065b
move asside lib/format.hpp
...
...to make room for a new more specialised header
2011-12-27 07:44:49 +01:00
d9f84a9bfd
clean up lib/meta namespaces
2011-12-03 03:15:59 +01:00
b9d1899486
cleanup: rectify Proc-Layer namespaces (II)
2011-12-02 17:50:44 +01:00
3f1b7651e9
GPL header whitespace
2010-12-17 23:28:49 +01:00
7b7e9096a3
Hook up scope contents iterator in PlacementIndex ( closes #343 )
2009-12-27 06:25:34 +01:00
07de2a767b
implement equality comparison on CommandImpl level
2009-10-11 05:57:44 +02:00
96d5ce74c4
Ticket #292 : outline unit test explicitly covering equality comparisions
2009-10-11 05:57:43 +02:00
63bad834c1
comparisons and state detection now working as expected
2009-07-20 05:09:46 +02:00
33757bbac3
why the hell doesn't boost provide functor comparison operators..
...
(yes I know why: it can't be implemented 100% correctly)
2009-07-20 04:21:24 +02:00
e879e0c81b
implemented argument and memento comparisons (doesn't pass test yet)
2009-07-19 19:13:25 +02:00
f73c938850
ArgumentHolder reworked to use InPlaceBuffer; now passes basic tests
2009-07-19 08:32:49 +02:00
9aa5ba560c
finish and tidy up control::Mutation, unit test pass
2009-07-10 19:04:01 +02:00
e892a0087a
remove this bool check...
...
seems to be overengineering! The same information can be easily accessed throught the ArgumentHolder
2009-07-10 19:00:40 +02:00
6bd1e8e179
tidy up and finish the MementoTie + unit test
2009-07-09 20:47:21 +02:00
c7b6165c6c
WIP resolved the simple mismatches, but still...
2009-07-08 05:36:02 +02:00
2348a5af2b
WIP draft capturing mechanism implementation, using the new tools and helpers...
2009-07-06 05:26:31 +02:00
51712f218d
still fighting to get capture fun and undo func bound together
2009-06-28 15:27:27 +02:00
