fdd940feba
clone builder implemented; problem resolved according to test
2009-10-11 05:57:45 +02:00
bb7ff5e317
WIP draft of clone builder implementation
2009-10-11 05:57:45 +02:00
7812792f75
unit test showing current malfunction of UNDO state due to cloning
2009-10-11 05:57:45 +02:00
a4ad41a4e9
Idea how to solve the problem with cloning the UNDO functor
2009-10-11 05:57:45 +02:00
0bcbf7fee0
fix further problems uncovered by test; allow for anonymous cloning
2009-10-11 05:57:45 +02:00
17c7160f02
refactor CommandDef, get rid of the possibility of re-defining. YAGNI!
2009-10-11 05:57:45 +02:00
2ad896027b
why doesn't the reverse lookup return a Symbol?
...
damn! I have the vague rememberance that I had a reason for
not returning a Symbol. Anyway, here it goes...
2009-10-11 05:57:44 +02:00
d2acf48587
change semantics of state predicates, as it seems less surprising this way
2009-10-11 05:57:44 +02:00
c8e049cdea
Command system basic unit test pass
2009-10-11 05:57:44 +02:00
5861597d7f
smash a glorious ref-to-local object bug
2009-10-11 05:57:44 +02:00
4f1c034b58
CommandRegistry: function test pass
2009-10-11 05:57:44 +02:00
07de2a767b
implement equality comparison on CommandImpl level
2009-10-11 05:57:44 +02:00
eefc40acb7
command-equality-test finished for now
2009-10-11 05:57:44 +02:00
231278bafe
implemented comparison on function erasure, pending test
2009-10-11 05:57:43 +02:00
5068016805
WIP draft how the equality comparison on a function erasure could work
2009-10-11 05:57:43 +02:00
6a737a5838
WIP draft the CommandEquality_test
2009-10-11 05:57:43 +02:00
96d5ce74c4
Ticket #292 : outline unit test explicitly covering equality comparisions
2009-10-11 05:57:43 +02:00
4c3fc9e64d
WIP getting CommandRegistry_test to run
...
(equality on CommandImpl is still missing)
2009-10-11 05:57:43 +02:00
39f50b548c
Ticket #266 : simplify and combine the bind(...) mixin templates into a single header
2009-10-11 05:57:43 +02:00
2aac4e8ea0
remove spurious AcceptArgumentBinding mixin from ArgumentHolder
...
it's an implementation class, after all, and doesn't need a convenience API
2009-10-11 05:57:43 +02:00
cb7c884293
handling patterns usable for now. Close #275
2009-10-11 05:57:42 +02:00
8136b0a4b8
HandlingPattern: basic unit test pass
2009-10-11 05:57:42 +02:00
8c21f21acc
namespace cleanup: bring Singleton and Factory into lib::
2009-10-11 05:57:41 +02:00
e9b95e47cf
Command handling pattern? test-driven brainstorming
2009-10-11 05:57:40 +02:00
18c357eb4a
start using Symbol datatype instead of a disguised char*
2009-10-11 05:57:38 +02:00
c9f3a345dc
WIP towards CommandRegistry implementation
2009-10-11 05:51:31 +02:00
246c535569
Rewrite CmdClosure to actually invoke rather then to create a tr1::bind term
...
basically this should close Ticket #205 (some details missing)
2009-09-21 03:15:06 +02:00
fd7337f801
WIP drastically simplify command-mutation.
...
As we're using now a command frontend interface and
and CommandImpl frame in the Registry, most of the
functionaliry on Mutation's interface is superfluous.
Additionally, this separates Mutation and Closure.
2009-09-20 18:37:20 +02:00
6fc7aedd95
Merge NoBug-release related additions
...
Merge branch 'master' into builder
2009-09-05 19:16:13 +02:00
70b4b0ad41
Fix some more format warnings
2009-09-05 19:11:17 +02:00
1969adaf02
Integration of Builder/NodeFactory implementation draft. Stubbed to pass compiler
2009-09-05 18:15:58 +02:00
1430965798
WIP: implementation of a node fabrication code path
2009-09-05 04:10:51 +02:00
Christian Thaeter
f73cc47da6
Fix all things which broke compilation with NoBug 200909.1
2009-09-04 08:53:03 +02:00
391181e699
WIP some further musing about how to do a simple invocation for unit testing ProcNode
2009-09-04 01:59:44 +02:00
ddb8805a73
WIP attempt to nail down a very simple example...
2009-08-31 01:32:53 +02:00
c89726e2d8
WIP set up some new tests for brainstorming...
2009-08-31 00:49:08 +02:00
4214284d35
accessing the frameID from within the pull() call
2009-08-29 12:26:47 +02:00
06000769e2
re-read the code concerning the pull()-call, fix obvious mismatches, comment, plan...
2009-08-29 12:23:41 +02:00
563d88c955
clean up unneccessary import
2009-08-29 12:23:40 +02:00
1b4aa98cdf
use the new stream type definitions to get ahead with the builder work
2009-08-29 12:19:26 +02:00
a845a4d234
unit test covering the cmd registry
2009-08-11 08:35:37 +02:00
5988b1d697
clean up command interface
2009-08-10 01:30:59 +02:00
b6246cbb10
rename the operation "closeArguments", which is more to the point
2009-08-04 02:24:47 +02:00
853aff1228
fixed and stubbed until it passes compiler again
2009-08-02 20:57:04 +02:00
327cbc822a
WIP extended binding and invocation to support the convenience shortcuts
2009-08-02 20:55:43 +02:00
4236d0649a
WIP: implement the basic operation of execution pattern
2009-08-02 18:00:03 +02:00
f2126c0764
WIP partially get new proc-layer command impl through the compiler
2009-08-01 23:57:12 +02:00
8971d667cf
WIP more implementation...
2009-08-01 17:14:27 +02:00
3ebb8d0285
WIP and more stubbing...
2009-07-26 02:00:47 +02:00
1db718c2b3
WIP more stubbing...
2009-07-25 19:21:50 +02:00
211a2dabdd
WIP stubbing undefined operations...
2009-07-24 17:50:14 +02:00
f40282b2ff
WIP devised various aspects of command execution, drafted as unit test
2009-07-24 05:24:39 +02:00
a8a0e07726
test driven brainstorming
2009-07-23 03:47:57 +02:00
c5f781596e
reorganise the intermediary command def context classes
2009-07-23 03:47:27 +02:00
d80f0cfb8d
WIP start some drafting
2009-07-21 04:49:00 +02:00
c85d1d3cd8
ArgumentHolder finished, low-level integration test pass
2009-07-20 07:03:18 +02:00
63bad834c1
comparisons and state detection now working as expected
2009-07-20 05:09:46 +02:00
e879e0c81b
implemented argument and memento comparisons (doesn't pass test yet)
2009-07-19 19:13:25 +02:00
f73c938850
ArgumentHolder reworked to use InPlaceBuffer; now passes basic tests
2009-07-19 08:32:49 +02:00
5f0c9e209e
remove any use of boost::function in favour of <tr1/functional>
...
this resolves some long standing problems with ambiguous placeholders
closes Ticket #161
2009-07-19 05:47:36 +02:00
6510155e76
back on route: trying to get the ArgumentHolder to fly...
2009-07-18 19:36:32 +02:00
1a69026acb
spelling fix
2009-07-13 01:16:40 +02:00
60cf9e8c9e
trying to implement a simple iterator adapter working
...
(oops, didn't expect this to be so difficult...)
2009-07-13 01:16:30 +02:00
b392d6bf84
WIP design a helper for accepting the arguments to bind
2009-07-12 19:30:55 +02:00
accaba4904
WIP impl draft for ArgumentHolder
2009-07-12 18:55:33 +02:00
6ef1aca3a4
test driven brainstorming
2009-07-11 20:06:35 +02:00
9aa5ba560c
finish and tidy up control::Mutation, unit test pass
2009-07-10 19:04:01 +02:00
6bd1e8e179
tidy up and finish the MementoTie + unit test
2009-07-09 20:47:21 +02:00
9e95ec8b60
MementoTie unit test pass
2009-07-09 18:35:22 +02:00
c7b6165c6c
WIP resolved the simple mismatches, but still...
2009-07-08 05:36:02 +02:00
bb390f2ef1
WIP: back to the original topic, define how capturing should work
2009-07-06 03:48:45 +02:00
c48f9086b7
extract util: isSameObject (bare ptr comparison)
2009-07-04 02:43:49 +02:00
ca807205f9
cleanup/refactor simple type seq handling, fix broken Split template
2009-06-30 04:54:50 +02:00
a19892ac6a
WIP some steps towards a solution of the memento binding problem
2009-06-29 06:33:42 +02:00
51712f218d
still fighting to get capture fun and undo func bound together
2009-06-28 15:27:27 +02:00
e91cdd39e9
stubbed and commented out to get it to compile
2009-06-26 05:27:24 +02:00
5ab8c126e0
WIP compilation fixes and stubs; split off MementoClosure (incl. separate unit test)
2009-06-24 06:38:33 +02:00
53e882ca3e
WIP should also cover the detection of empty functors
2009-06-24 06:01:14 +02:00
69d6bad1f4
WIP brainstorming about a way how the extended memento capturing closure might work
2009-06-24 05:51:02 +02:00
bc94f299e2
hey... now storing the operation is almost effortless!
2009-06-20 07:13:20 +02:00
f358f548d1
draft version of CmdClosure and Mutation interface now passing compiler
2009-06-19 19:11:33 +02:00
e951c468a7
WIP: header rename
2009-06-19 14:47:37 +02:00
0ab5a92629
WIP: test-driven brainstorming... how to capture state and params.
2009-06-19 05:57:06 +02:00
d1b425aba9
finish and tidy the extracted headers
2009-06-17 06:55:18 +02:00
ab4b4c71e6
WIP: start extacting new headers
2009-06-16 11:39:36 +02:00
df6312a581
got it through the compiler...
2009-06-15 04:57:23 +02:00
441cb6b9e2
WIP try to solve the problem of closing a function with arbitrary args
2009-06-15 03:47:05 +02:00
7741b50b91
WIP rewrote the Sub-Tuple extractor into a simplistic Tuple type
2009-06-14 19:40:35 +02:00
b937bd08ae
WIP: parameter closure brainstorming
2009-06-14 05:38:35 +02:00
c87970e13b
Add command explaining what's actually going on here...
2009-06-12 20:21:46 +02:00
2914f6685b
actually create the chain of Definition-Objects
2009-06-12 20:10:27 +02:00
72d51077f7
change type dissection template to work rather in forward direction
...
allowing for the user just to specify a function without any type parameters
2009-06-12 19:49:44 +02:00
246529bae9
concpet draft of parameter type extraction and checking works (i.e. compiles)
2009-06-10 05:00:01 +02:00
e3da082016
WIP idea to allow arbitrary command parameters
2009-06-10 03:42:23 +02:00
102e96891b
fixing, stubbing, and some chainsaw surgery to get half-finished code through the compiler
2009-06-09 09:05:19 +02:00
3a7de1654a
WIP: create a "scrapbook" test for trying out some ideas
2009-06-08 21:29:09 +02:00
321acc7f4e
WIP: add type handling and conversion test
2009-06-07 03:36:27 +02:00
f1827ea753
WIP: test support macro for exception check
2009-06-07 03:22:08 +02:00
905c0319be
WIP: add lifecycle test
2009-06-07 03:12:07 +02:00
2731e34c3e
WIP: test driven brainstorming: basic MObjectRef behaviour
2009-06-07 00:45:55 +02:00
