8345df394d
WIP continued turning over the problem....
2009-10-23 03:10:55 +02:00
90e09b9fa0
WIP trying to get ahed with the problem of issuing queries
2009-10-22 17:24:57 +02:00
007a6e1855
Consideration how to issue content discovery queries
2009-10-21 05:35:32 +02:00
452e1bb727
WIP draft an unit test detailing QueryFocus operation
2009-10-20 05:34:58 +02:00
f01da49955
WIP planning the operations needed on QueryFocus
2009-10-20 04:31:50 +02:00
f0c9beb5c6
WIP design the ScopePath API by unit test
2009-10-18 19:08:21 +02:00
474c293197
first shot at Ticket #355 : use a default-constructed "invalid" PlacementRef
...
Making PlacementRef default constructible this way
would resolve the immediate problems; as any access
goes through an index lookup and thus will throw.
The bool check on this special ref yields false,
so this solution seems to fill the bill.
2009-10-18 01:30:43 +02:00
2e62a3b01b
WIP continue design how to discover session contents
2009-10-17 21:31:03 +02:00
2ca89010d1
introduce pointer-to-PlacementIndex typedef
2009-10-17 21:29:16 +02:00
b03577ea3f
document the stipulations lib::IterAdapter puts on his parameter types
2009-10-17 15:40:37 +02:00
3b1301be14
WIP stubbed some of the operations to implement on class Scope
2009-10-17 02:16:19 +02:00
a662b176bb
WIP test-driven brainstorming: what is a Scope?
2009-10-17 02:15:28 +02:00
cfc17e75ba
refined and clarified planning of Scope and QueryFocus
2009-10-16 21:20:30 +02:00
9451a6888f
start definition of new session::Scope interface
2009-10-16 03:13:57 +02:00
d193fbf920
Planning the QueryFocus in more detail
2009-10-16 01:54:38 +02:00
65f100c1a2
start 2 unit tests for scope handling
2009-10-14 06:18:25 +02:00
edbd54b062
Initial planning regaring the QueryFocus
2009-10-14 05:48:24 +02:00
193fd2d66b
Start the new Session structure with Timeline and Sequences
2009-10-14 05:39:49 +02:00
4695f41b7c
Documentation of PlacementScope concept
2009-10-12 08:10:00 +02:00
aacafd49b3
SCons: switch to combined timestamp/MD5 change detection
...
this setting speeds up "sparse" builds
(when e.g. just one file changed).
2009-10-11 07:36:02 +02:00
cd51e5fef0
Proc Command handling frontend finished and usable for now
...
Additional convenience shortcuts and a bit of polishing.
Closes Ticket #300
2009-10-11 05:57:46 +02:00
c6d5f8a0b4
Proc Command framework: *first integraton round finished*
2009-10-11 05:57:46 +02:00
36d615dd3a
add test case covering the string representation of commands
2009-10-11 05:57:46 +02:00
ae01f85452
replace existing implementation with CommandImplCloneBuilder
2009-10-11 05:57:45 +02:00
fdd940feba
clone builder implemented; problem resolved according to test
2009-10-11 05:57:45 +02:00
e32044e453
refactor CmdClosure to accept a cloneBuilder visitor
2009-10-11 05:57:45 +02:00
bb7ff5e317
WIP draft of clone builder implementation
2009-10-11 05:57:45 +02:00
7812792f75
unit test showing current malfunction of UNDO state due to cloning
2009-10-11 05:57:45 +02:00
a4ad41a4e9
Idea how to solve the problem with cloning the UNDO functor
2009-10-11 05:57:45 +02:00
0bcbf7fee0
fix further problems uncovered by test; allow for anonymous cloning
2009-10-11 05:57:45 +02:00
17c7160f02
refactor CommandDef, get rid of the possibility of re-defining. YAGNI!
2009-10-11 05:57:45 +02:00
37cd451367
fix sloppy definition of less-than comparison, which caused malfunction of registry
2009-10-11 05:57:45 +02:00
2ad896027b
why doesn't the reverse lookup return a Symbol?
...
damn! I have the vague rememberance that I had a reason for
not returning a Symbol. Anyway, here it goes...
2009-10-11 05:57:44 +02:00
d2acf48587
change semantics of state predicates, as it seems less surprising this way
2009-10-11 05:57:44 +02:00
95db5f9840
clarify state predicates in conjunction with command lifecycle
2009-10-11 05:57:44 +02:00
c8e049cdea
Command system basic unit test pass
2009-10-11 05:57:44 +02:00
5861597d7f
smash a glorious ref-to-local object bug
2009-10-11 05:57:44 +02:00
4f1c034b58
CommandRegistry: function test pass
2009-10-11 05:57:44 +02:00
07de2a767b
implement equality comparison on CommandImpl level
2009-10-11 05:57:44 +02:00
eefc40acb7
command-equality-test finished for now
2009-10-11 05:57:44 +02:00
fea85acd0e
equality comparisons on function erasure objects covered
...
...well, as good as possible, as boost refuses to implement this feature
2009-10-11 05:57:43 +02:00
231278bafe
implemented comparison on function erasure, pending test
2009-10-11 05:57:43 +02:00
5068016805
WIP draft how the equality comparison on a function erasure could work
2009-10-11 05:57:43 +02:00
6a737a5838
WIP draft the CommandEquality_test
2009-10-11 05:57:43 +02:00
96d5ce74c4
Ticket #292 : outline unit test explicitly covering equality comparisions
2009-10-11 05:57:43 +02:00
4c3fc9e64d
WIP getting CommandRegistry_test to run
...
(equality on CommandImpl is still missing)
2009-10-11 05:57:43 +02:00
39f50b548c
Ticket #266 : simplify and combine the bind(...) mixin templates into a single header
2009-10-11 05:57:43 +02:00
2aac4e8ea0
remove spurious AcceptArgumentBinding mixin from ArgumentHolder
...
it's an implementation class, after all, and doesn't need a convenience API
2009-10-11 05:57:43 +02:00
abd23ae399
TypedAllocationManager (frontend) now in lib:: -- unit test pass
2009-10-11 05:57:43 +02:00
d7ef67e821
reduce the stress load on TypedCounter_test, to avoid testsuite out of memory
2009-10-11 05:57:42 +02:00
